Processed: severity of 899405 is important

2018-05-24 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > severity 899405 important Bug #899405 [tracker.debian.org] tracker: Default documentation is not user-oriented Severity set to 'important' from 'normal' > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 899405: htt

Processed (with 1 error): Re: Bug#899405: tracker: Default documentation is not user-oriented

2018-05-24 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tag -1 + newcomer Bug #899405 [tracker.debian.org] tracker: Default documentation is not user-oriented Added tag(s) newcomer. > severity -1 + important Unknown command or malformed arguments to command. -- 899405: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug

Bug#899405: tracker: Default documentation is not user-oriented

2018-05-24 Thread Raphael Hertzog
Control: tag -1 + newcomer Control: severity -1 + important Hello, On Wed, 23 May 2018, Guillem Jover wrote: > The tracker provides links to its documentation (at [T]), but that > looks rather developer oriented. If you want to get some user > documentation it seems that currently the main source

Re: Redundant fields in debian/upstream/metadata and possible lintian check

2018-05-24 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi Dylan, On Thu, May 24, 2018 at 01:25:50PM +0200, Dylan Aïssi wrote: > 2018-05-23 15:39 GMT+02:00 Andreas Tille : > > These data are gathered in UDD[2]. When I inspected the log of the UDD > > importer I noticed that there are a lot of redundant fields like > > "Homepage" or "Watch" where we ag

Re: Redundant fields in debian/upstream/metadata and possible lintian check

2018-05-24 Thread Dylan Aïssi
Hi, 2018-05-23 15:39 GMT+02:00 Andreas Tille : > These data are gathered in UDD[2]. When I inspected the log of the UDD > importer I noticed that there are a lot of redundant fields like > "Homepage" or "Watch" where we agreed that these fields should not be > duplicated in upstream/metadata. Th

Bug#899882: marked as done (Cannot add packages in NEW to a team)

2018-05-24 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 24 May 2018 10:44:36 +0200 with message-id and subject line Re: Bug#899882: Cannot add packages in NEW to a team has caused the Debian Bug report #899882, regarding Cannot add packages in NEW to a team to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has be

Bug#899882: Cannot add packages in NEW to a team

2018-05-24 Thread Mattia Rizzolo
On Thu, May 24, 2018 at 09:54:53AM +0200, Thomas Goirand wrote: > As we're now team+openst...@tracker.debian.org for the maintainer field, > the consequence can be that we may never receive bugs and other important > emails if we forget to add the package to the team. AFAIK, packages using team+$f

Bug#899882: Cannot add packages in NEW to a team

2018-05-24 Thread Thomas Goirand
Package: tracker.debian.org Severity: normal Hi there! When I package a new thing, and then upload it, my procedure includes setting-up a new Salsa repo and configuring it with hooks, etc. Unfortunately, I cannot add it to the tracker, because the package doesn't exist yet in Debian. And when th