On Sat, Nov 01, 2003 at 12:31:30AM +1100, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> * Ben Armstrong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003-10-31 08:59]:
> > The challenge I would like to make to anyone who would like to help in this
> > area is to write a web-based report showing at any given time bug su
Hi,
An important job of Debian Jr. is to ensure that all Debian Jr. meta
packages make it into the next release. However, any RC bugs remaining at
release time against pacakges upon which any meta package still depends
could cause removal of the entire package. Any such checking for bugs and
pu
On Fri, Aug 23, 2002 at 01:46:54PM +0200, Josip Rodin wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 09, 2002 at 10:08:56PM +0200, Josip Rodin wrote:
> > Please file an RC bug on hatman. I'll probably have it removed from the
> > distribution, it's pretty much useless anyway unless the upstream releases a
> > new version, a
While looking for a TrueType font suitable for use in tuxpaint (to replace
the proprietary chicago.ttf font currently in the package) I tried this:
apt-file search '\.ttf'
I found quite a number of packages with .ttf files in them.
At random, I picked hatman and checked it out. It has two fonts
On Tue, May 14, 2002 at 09:12:34PM -0400, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
> I have 5294 RRD files and am continuing to collect data, but I haven't put
> together any tools to present it. I would just make the data available for
> others to experiment with, but it's enormous (828M). Here's a
> quick-and-dir
On Thu, Apr 18, 2002 at 10:39:28PM -0400, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
> > Ben Armstrong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Is there any tool to visualize the bug history over the release cycle of
> > > an
> > > individual package?
...
> I've set up a lit
Is there any tool to visualize the bug history over the release cycle of an
individual package? I'm thinking that would be an interesting way to see
activity on a package "at a glance". The graph might consist of a time X
axis and a bug# Y axis. Bugs would be coloured by severity (changing colour
On Sat, Feb 02, 2002 at 10:58:55AM +0100, Johan Walles wrote:
> I would like to see a Freshmeat like vitality index for Debian
> packages. Basically, it is a measurement of how actively a package is
> being maintained. My intended use for it is that when there are
> several packages providing the
On Tue, Jan 08, 2002 at 11:43:54PM +0100, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> The main problem is that it's very much work if every six months a person
> comes and tries to go through the WNPP bugs. That's something I hope it
> will become with my proposal of testing tasks - there are people
> responsible for WNP
r for children,
but improve the quality of Debian as a whole.
Ben Armstrong
--
nSLUG http://www.nslug.ns.ca [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Debian http://www.debian.org [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[ pgp key fingerprint = 7F DA 09 4B BA 2C 0D E0 1B B1 31 ED C6 A9 39 4F ]
[ gpg key fingerp
On Fri, Jan 04, 2002 at 11:33:33AM -0200, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> Be careful about bugs that say 'preliminary packages at URL foo'. You need
> to go there to verify if the ITP is inactive or not.
Also be careful about old ITPs with no apparent activity which are held up
because of tho
11 matches
Mail list logo
