Package: qa.debian.org
Severity: normal
The packages' l10n status pacges are no longer generated on
i18n.debian.net but on i18n.debian.org
So, anywhere where http://i18n.debian.net appears, it should reference
http://i18n.debian.org
-- System Information:
Debian Release: wheezy/sid
APT prefer
Quoting Mehdi Dogguy (me...@dogguy.org):
> Not yet, because the migration isn't finished yet : If you check [1],
> you'll notice a lot of i18n.debian.net entries that don't exist. Their
> .org equivalent exists though. I guess you have to fix your scripts first.
Just fixed.
> Besides, the old w
Quoting Holger Levsen (hol...@layer-acht.org):
> so i'm lucking for an easier target first: automatic d-i-manual builds
> triggered on every commit to svn trunk? would that be useful?
*that* is definitely useful. Along with failure reports sent to -boot,
that would be perfect.
Another interesti
Quoting Holger Levsen (hol...@layer-acht.org):
> Package: console-setup
> Version: 1.108
> Severity: important
> User: debian-qa@lists.debian.org
> Usertags: piuparts piuparts.d.o
Kudos for bug #75. First time that piuparts wins a "round" bug
number in the silly "nice" bug number contest:
Package: qa.debian.org
Severity: wishlist
>From IRC:
08:25 < bubulle> hmmm, /me wonders whether #352166 (shadow FTBFS on hppa)
shoul djust be closed or not. It seems
that there's been a binNMU this morning but I have no clue
about who did it and whether this
just says the FTBFS was a problem on t
Quoting Bas Zoetekouw ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> Hi!
>
> I'm planning to file bugs for packages that use non-UTF-8 encodings in
> debian/control and/or debian/copyright.
copyright or changelog? Or both?
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
if necessary).
>
> I should remark here that almost all of the work was done by Christian
> Perrier. I merely reported most of the bugs; Christian fixed most of
> them.
Sure but your work helped *a lot* for this. I just found those issues
a few weeks and decided that I would give
(Please CC me to replies)
I got this when I wrote to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]":
I'm sorry to have to inform you that your message could not
be delivered to one or more recipients. It's attached below.
For further assistance, please send mail to postmaster.
If you do so, please include this problem re
Quoting James Westby ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> For the geneweb part I am Ccing Christian. Christian, do you know of
> anybody that would be interested in the dag2html package? Would it
> be worth contacting your upstream?
I don't have any real idea of who could be interested in it.
However, on sho
Quoting James Westby ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> Is it an updated version, or still the same code do you know?
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/src/debian/geneweb/geneweb-5.01/dag2html> ls -l
total 88
-rw--- 1 bubulle bubulle 1936 jan 1 2006 dag2html.1
-rw--- 1 bubulle bubulle 42802 déc 13 2005 dag2ht
Quoting Barry deFreese ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> Christian Perrier wrote:
>> Quoting James Westby ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
>>
>>
>>> Is it an updated version, or still the same code do you know?
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
> I&#x
Package: qa.debian.org
Severity: normal
As of now, oldstable is no longer supported (security-wise).
I wonder whether it should still be listed on p.q.d.o pages in such
situations, which might be misleading to out users.
(side comment: I think that the drop of support for oldstable has not been
Quoting Pierre Habouzit ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> Hi,
>
> As some of you may know, I've been the original creator of bts-link[0].
> Though, I have currently neither the motivation, nor the time to
> maintain it, or run it on a regular basis[1].
>
> I believe bts-link has become an important piece of
Quoting Sandro Tosi (mo...@debian.org):
> I'd be very welcome to maintain it, in the QA architecture, but I need
> some guidance in the setup on merkel and stuff like this.
Any news about this ?
bts-link is seriously missing, now, for those of us who heavily work
with their upstream's BTS (hint
Quoting Sandro Tosi (mo...@debian.org):
> Sadly no, mainly because I was waiting for a sort of approval/ack from
> QA team, that never came (I don't know if it's needed, but I saw it as
> a source of courtesy).
Well, maybe just because nobody in the QA team felt in charge of
providing you with a
Quoting Stefano Zacchiroli (z...@debian.org):
> Maybe, what can be done, is to add a pop-up on version numbers for
> specific releases which shows binNMU versions only for the
> architectures which have some. Still, doing that would require
> downloading version information for all architectures,
During last weeks, my l10n NMU campaign went on the following packages
that seem more or less abandoned:
canna: last maintainer upload March 2007, two NMUs since then, several
trivial lintian fixes
nethack: last maintainer upload Nov 2006, 6 NMUs since then, several
trivial lintia
This package lists Cai Qian as maintainer but
(s)he's no longer active and the @debian.org address bounces.
Antony Fok is listed as Uploader.
I suggest the package to be orphaned unless Antony steps up as
maintainer.
PS: I have an l10n NMU that's being cooked up. It will probably clean
out triv
Quoting Ana Guerrero (a...@debian.org):
> I know this is done with the best intentions but if you think the package
> is in bad shape or neglected by the maintainer then it might better write
> to mia@, debian-qa@ or open a bug asking whether the package should be
> orphaned (or even removed).
(CC'ed to -qa as this may be seen as some kind of QA work)
Some of you have noticed the "NMU campaign" (NMU==non-maintainer
upload, ie building an uploading a package while you're indeed not the
official maintainer for it) currently running for fixing longstanding
l10n bugs (up to now debconf tran
Hello folks,
The shadow package is officially maintained by Karl Ramm, with
assistance by Sam Hartman. It is the source package for "login" and
"passwd", two important pieces of Debian base system.
I have helped Karl in collecting the package translations (both
debconf and programs translations)
> > I have announced in many places my intent to take over the package
> > development, which I'm in fact doing since mid 2004 (with NMUs).
>
> Would you also take over xscreensaver and maybe let me co-maintain it?
I'm afraid I have to decline. More packages would be, for me, a bit
too much and
Quoting Frank Lichtenheld ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> > If it is really unmaintained currently, I'll try the new patch sent by
> > Denis and then upload a NMU.
>
> No need to do that. I have prepared a QA Upload for it[0] and will
> incorporate Denis' patch today. If you want I can send it to you
> to
(please CC me to answers)
Is there a documentation somewhere about the Correct way to do a QA
upload. In fact, I even don't know whether what I intend to do *is* a
QA upload ;.. :-)
cxhextris (1.0-23.2) unstable; urgency=low
* Non-maintainer upload
* Fixed the fuzzy translation in fr.po. Closes: #206345
-- Christian Perrier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Tue, 26 Aug 2003 09:44:22 +0200
cxhextris (1.0-23.1) unstable; urgency=low
* NMU (orphaned package, so no maint
> > The chpasswd program ignores the system MD5 setting in /etc/pam.d/passwd
> > (also tried MD5_CRYPT_ENAB in /etc/login.defs) and instead hashes all
> > passwords with DES. In the case of compromise of /etc/shadow, this
> > greatly increases the ease with which attackers can crack back passwords
26 matches
Mail list logo
