I can confirm that the patch fixes the reported issue.
Regards, Daniel
eam - the
Debian packages should always behave like the upstream releases. Thus we were
always working closely with upstream (Debian even had a chair in the OASIS,
IIRC). And I fail to see good reasons. why we would want to change that, as
well.
Daniel
--
Regards,
Daniel Leidert | http
Am Montag, dem 21.02.2022 um 00:55 -0300 schrieb Joao Eriberto Mota Filho:
> Package: docbook
> Version: 4.5-9
> Severity: normal
> X-Debbugs-Cc: Mark W. Eichin , Adam Di Carlo
> , J.H.M. Dassen (Ray) , Yann Dirson
> , Steve Langasek , Daniel Leidert
> (dale) , Jakub Wilk
Package: dblatex
Version: 0.3.12py3-1
Severity: important
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
While building a PDF we stumbled upon an issue. Some of our XML files contain
screen elements with non UTF-8 characters. When we enable scaling for listing
elements:
scale.by.width
dblatex
Today I found several packages for which the version and release information is
completely wrong. rmadison and the tracker report different releases for the
same versions. Examples:
ruby-capistrano-colors
ruby-cal-heatmap-rails
ruby-algorithm-diff
ruby-albino
I'll probably find more. But this
Am Samstag, den 28.03.2020, 15:43 +0100 schrieb Adam Borowski:
> On Sat, Mar 28, 2020 at 03:10:56PM +0100, Daniel Leidert wrote:
> > Package: tracker.debian.org
> > https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/berkshelf
> >
> > still shows a version for berkshelf in unstable altoug
Package: tracker.debian.org
Severity: normal
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/berkshelf
still shows a version for berkshelf in unstable altough this package has been
removed more then a month ago. Also the package database has no berkshelf
record
, ...).
I'm finally out :) If nobody steps up, the mentioned packages will be
officially orphaned after September 2015.
Regards, Daniel
Am Freitag, den 24.07.2015, 17:40 -0400 schrieb Kristoffer Rose:
Yes, that would be great! --Kris
On Jul 24, 2015 5:35 PM, Daniel Leidert
daniel.leidert.s
Hi Kris,
Am Samstag, den 30.05.2015, 22:08 -0400 schrieb Kristoffer Rose:
I have XML expertise, I am a DD, and I maintain nothing for now (only
have a few ITPs out).
Any chance you would be at DebCamp and could do a two day intense
catchup on the involved work?
I'll be at DebConf. Maybe
Hi,
Is it possible, that the watch file service of our PTS has some issue
atm? The PTS spuriously reports temporary or permanent problems for
some projects, although the watch files look perfectly ok to me and
uscan does work as expected. Some examples:
Am Samstag, den 30.05.2015, 19:00 +0200 schrieb W. Martin Borgert:
On 2015-05-28 23:24, Daniel Leidert wrote:
[not using DB toolchain]
Just out of curiosity: What are you using now?
I haven't done much documentation lately. But I use GROFF for writing
manual pages for Debian packages. Even
x-post
Hi everybody,
I was part of the Debian XML/SGML team [1] for quite some time and it
was fun maintaining the whole DocBook toolchain. Unfortunately I'm not
using it anymore and thus have lost interest in these packages. Now
after Jessie has been released, I'm finally stepping back as
Hi,
I noticed, that the debcheck QA pages were updated last in September 2013.
Is this normal/intentional or is there some issue? The qa.d.o bug-tracker
doesn't list a bug report about this.
Regards, Daniel
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of
# sent too early by accident
Hi,
Andreas, if you are right with your observation (which I don't doubt),
than dh_installinfo/debhelper needs to care about creating an empty prerm
script. It cannot be the task of package maintainers, which are affected
by this transition, to create and ship an
Hi,
Andreas, if you are right with your observation (which I don't doubt),
than dh_installinfo/debhelper needs to care about creating an empty prerm
script. It cannot be the task of package maintainers, which are affected
by this transition to create and ship an empty prerm scripts for 2
releases
Hi,
After fixing CVE-2009-3560 in the expat package [1] I was informed, that
it broke parsing [2] in some documents. After talking to upstream [3],
the fix for CVE-2009-3560 has been adjusted [4][5].
[1] http://bugs.debian.org/560901
[2] http://bugs.debian.org/561658
[3]
Hi Patrick,
Am Donnerstag, den 22.10.2009, 12:43 +0200 schrieb Patrick Schoenfeld:
I've seen that you were interested to adopt the xml-resume-library
package, but lost interest.
If I have some more time maybe I'll adopt this package.
But as far as I can tell from your
comments you already
Am Sonntag, den 31.05.2009, 16:37 +0200 schrieb Andreas Tille:
On Sun, May 31, 2009 at 03:28:27PM +0200, Daniel Leidert wrote:
Committed yesterday. I cannot upload the package, but you can, if you
need it. IIRC the build hung on an i386 system when I tested 1.2.9. That
might need some
Am Freitag, den 29.05.2009, 23:32 +0200 schrieb Andreas Tille:
I realised that cimg-dev package was not updated since
nearly two days. Two bugs requesting an update to
more recent upstream version (#399846, #497672) one
of them is even blocking an other package were ignored.
The 4 bugs of
Raphael Geissert wrote:
Daniel Leidert wrote:
[sf.net redirector broken]
Being curious, why did you access the redirector directly and not via
uscan?
I found the problem, because PET currently fails on watch files
with sf.net URLs. See for example here (DownloadError):
http
Hi,
When I type the requested URL, say for example
http://qa.debian.org/watch/sf.php/docbook-xsl
Then an Internal Server Error is reported and the page
itself shows:
No mirror could satisfy the request. Please report this
message to debian-qa@lists.debian.org
Using uscan on the command line
Package: qa.debian.org
Severity: normal
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I don't know if you changed something but when I looked at the list of
my packages (packages I (co-)maintain) today I found just an incomplete
list. I have 37 source packages, but [1] just lists 12 or so.
I
Am Sonntag, den 09.12.2007, 15:39 +0100 schrieb Lucas Nussbaum:
[docbook-defguide ITA]
Have you made some progress on this stuff?
Ok, so this is JFTR. After a long night, most of the work is done (maybe
around 70%):
Am Dienstag, den 28.08.2007, 11:00 +0200 schrieb Bluefuture:
[wrong Debian version]
http://dehs.alioth.debian.org/maintainer.php?name=gabedit
[..]
and the copyright link is still broken (tested with lynx and iceweasel).
Do I have to wait some minutes or do I have to check at a different
This bug doesn't seem to be fixed. When I look at the page:
http://dehs.alioth.debian.org/maintainer.php?name=gabedit
it still says:
Debian Version: 2.0.11
instead of:
Debian Version: 2.0.11-1
and the copyright link is still broken (tested with lynx and iceweasel).
Do I have to wait some
Package: qa.debian.org
Severity: normal
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Look at http://dehs.alioth.debian.org/maintainer.php?name=gabedit and
you can see, that the Debian version seems to be 2.0.11. But gabedit is
at 2.0.11-1. So the created link to the copyright is broken too.
Package: qa.debian.org
Severity: normal
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
See http://qa.debian.org/[EMAIL PROTECTED] and
look at the gabedit package. You will, that the table shoes, that
upstream is at version number 2011, which seems to be higher than
2.0.11, but it's of course not
Am Samstag, den 10.03.2007, 14:15 +0100 schrieb Luca Falavigna:
Please find attached a debdiff implementing this.
Thank you.
einfaches Textdokument-Anlage (xawtv_3.95.dfsg.1-3.debdiff)
diff -Nru xawtv-3.95.dfsg.1/debian/changelog
xawtv-3.95.dfsg.1/debian/changelog
---
tags 299692 + patch pending
thanks
Hi,
I'm about to take over and update the docbook-ebnf package. About the
issue you reported in
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=299692;archive=yes.
The EBNF Public IDs are not registered in the root catalog. Doing a
29 matches
Mail list logo
