Re: Bug#539749: Time for a new maintainer for Auctex?

2009-08-24 Thread Davide G. M. Salvetti
fant == Frank Küster [2009-8-21] fant Davide G. M. Salvetti sa...@debian.org wrote: fant But I also think that your style of working is not encouraging for fant collaborators. You actually *do* accept patches, sometimes as-is, fant sometimes you take them as inspiration, but solve the issue

Re: Time for a new maintainer for Auctex?

2009-08-20 Thread Davide G. M. Salvetti
AT == Andreas Tille [2009-8-19] AT Considering the facts presented above asking people for sending AT patches is a bit weak arguing (well not even so weak as the AT packaging work where we can not see a visible sign in the changelog AT since two years). Dear Andreas, actually I am not

Re: Time for a new maintainer for Auctex?

2009-08-20 Thread Davide G. M. Salvetti
of a AT package I would say sorry to my fellow developers for doing so and AT enable them to change the status. I do not see how I am blocking any package. You need not to maintain a package to help packaging, nor do you need it to upload it. AT debian/control says: AT Maintainer: Davide G. M. Salvetti sa

Re: Time for a new maintainer for Auctex?

2009-08-14 Thread Davide G. M. Salvetti
DB == David Bremner [2009-8-14] [...] DB I don't think that any of this changes my major point, which is that DB the package at least seems abandoned by its maintainer(s). I would DB be quite happy to be corrected on this point. Hi, please, stand corrected, as I intend to keep auctex

Re: Bugs older than two years

1999-03-31 Thread Davide G. M. Salvetti
* AT = Anthony Towns AT Package: itimer AT Maintainer: AT 8049 itimer edits /etc/site-start.el IIRC we decided a while ago we didn't need itimer any more (i.e., the itimer package should have gone); it's probably safe to close this bug. Regards, -- Davide G. M. Salvetti -- IW5DZC http

Re: Failed Maintainer Addresses

1998-03-25 Thread Davide G. M. Salvetti
* CLos = Christian Lynbech on satellite [itimer] CLos I had a hunch, though I wasn't sure about mailcrypt. I'm the mailcrypt maintainer; there's no need for itimer: mailcrypt only uses it if it's there, for compatibility, but otherwise uses Emacs internal timer. -- Davide G. M. Salvetti