Re: UDD chokes on debbugs data

2012-09-20 Thread Don Armstrong
insrc and srcbin index, and the code that rebuilds that isn't particularly fast.] It has just finished the first run, and I'm in the process of adding the entries which have been added since the run started. Don Armstrong -- If it jams, force it. If it breaks, it needed replacing anyw

Re: UDD chokes on debbugs data

2012-09-20 Thread Don Armstrong
On Thu, 20 Sep 2012, Don Armstrong wrote: > On Thu, 20 Sep 2012, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: > > [ Adding debian-debbugs@ to Cc. Full thread at > > http://lists.debian.org/debian-qa/2012/09/msg00027.html ] > > Yes, I'm aware of this problem, and have been in the process of f

Re: bts soap seems broken

2013-03-18 Thread Don Armstrong
g of index.db.realtime. I'll take a closer look at it shortly. [I glanced at it earlier just to show to myself that you were seeing a real problem, but I haven't had a chance to really fix it.] Don Armstrong -- "People selling drug paraphernalia ... are as much a part of drug tra

Re: BTS and UDD disagrees on the number of RC bugs in stable

2014-02-05 Thread Don Armstrong
> The BTS lists e.g. #710310, which is wheezy-ignore. So it seems that the > BTS ignores wheezy-ignore. Yeah. I think this is a bug I introduced when I switched to using bugcfg instead of the hardcoded values which were being used before. I just fixed this in @81492, but I h

Re: BTS and UDD disagrees on the number of RC bugs in stable

2014-02-07 Thread Don Armstrong
On Wed, 05 Feb 2014, Don Armstrong wrote: > Yeah. I think this is a bug I introduced when I switched to using > bugcfg instead of the hardcoded values which were being used before. I > just fixed this in @81492, but I haven't rolled it out to the BTS yet. I've now rolled this

Re: BTS and UDD disagrees on the number of RC bugs in stable

2014-02-18 Thread Don Armstrong
Tue, 18 Feb 2014, Holger Levsen wrote: > On Freitag, 7. Februar 2014, Don Armstrong wrote: > > I've now rolled this out, but bugscan's crontab hasn't run yet. I'll > > keep an eye on it to make sure it works. > > https://bugs.debian.org/release-critical/ do

Re: BTS and UDD disagrees on the number of RC bugs in stable

2014-03-20 Thread Don Armstrong
On Tue, 18 Feb 2014, Don Armstrong wrote: > Yeah, it's not working. I've got it on my TODO list, but haven't had a > chance to work on it yet. I will probably have a chance next weekend > to spend some time on it. So I think I've fixed this now; had to finally s

Re: ignoring bugs with no maintainer (Re: Removal of emacs23 from unstable/testing)

2014-05-11 Thread Don Armstrong
the BTS, but doing so requires me to complete the postgresql migration work. -- Don Armstrong http://www.donarmstrong.com All bad precedents began as justifiable measures. -- Gaius Julius Caesar in "The Conspiracy of Catiline" by Sallust -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to de

Re: Facilitating contributions by newcomers

2014-11-11 Thread Don Armstrong
> infrastructure in a separate category. Stefano Zacchiroli did that for > some debsources bugs, and this apparently had noticeable effects in > terms of contributions. [...] > [0] https://wiki.debian.org/qa.debian.org/GiftTag Does anyone have any thoughts about elevating the gift tag to

Making "entry-point" nee "gift" a real BTS tag [Re: Facilitating contributions by newcomers]

2014-11-11 Thread Don Armstrong
ift;tag=faketag;user=debian-qa@lists.debian.org We can also just make sure that bugs which have the gift tag get the "entry-point" tag too. [And we should probably do the opposite as well.] This would be a bit hacky, but it's totally possible to do in a pretty quick cronjob un

Re: Making "entry-point" nee "gift" a real BTS tag [Re: Facilitating contributions by newcomers]

2014-11-11 Thread Don Armstrong
On Tue, 11 Nov 2014, Stéphane Aulery wrote: > Le mardi 11 novembre 2014 à 02:45:26, Don Armstrong a écrit : > > On Tue, 11 Nov 2014, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: > > > I am totally in favor of turning it into a real tag. > > > > > > There has been discussions about r

Re: Making "entry-point" nee "gift" a real BTS tag [Re: Facilitating contributions by newcomers]

2014-11-11 Thread Don Armstrong
On Wed, 12 Nov 2014, Stéphane Aulery wrote: > Le mardi 11 novembre 2014 à 03:07:31, Don Armstrong a écrit : > > > > The existing help tag is really for bugs for which the maintainer needs > > or wants help; these are basically a superset of entry-point, and bugs > > wh

Re: Making "entry-point" nee "gift" a real BTS tag [Re: Facilitating contributions by newcomers]

2014-11-12 Thread Don Armstrong
On Wed, 12 Nov 2014, Stéphane Aulery wrote: > Le mardi 11 novembre 2014 à 03:54:50, Don Armstrong a écrit : > > On Wed, 12 Nov 2014, Stéphane Aulery wrote: > > > Le mardi 11 novembre 2014 à 03:07:31, Don Armstrong a écrit : > > > > > > > > The existing

Re: Making "entry-point" nee "gift" a real BTS tag

2014-11-13 Thread Don Armstrong
new letter. [Hopefully this will work; I reserve the right to veto if silliness occurs.] -- Don Armstrong http://www.donarmstrong.com If it jams, force it. If it breaks, it needed replacing anyway. -- Lowery's Law -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-requ...@lists.de

newcomer will be this tag. [Re: Making "entry-point" nee "gift" a real BTS tag]

2014-11-14 Thread Don Armstrong
On Thu, 13 Nov 2014, Don Armstrong wrote: > To avoid devolving in a naming the bike-shed discussion, anyone who has > a strong opinion, please manually vote in > > https://debian.titanpad.com/24 > > and I'll tabulate them 24 hours from now. The winner is "newcome

Bug#753683: tracker.debian.org: '1 bug tagged help in the BTS', but no bug is open

2014-12-01 Thread Don Armstrong
doesn't make > much sense to me... why does it list so many source packages and not > only one like on > https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=704070 ? It lists multiple sources because this bug was filed against the ffmpeg binary package, which is built from those sources,

Bug#753683: tracker.debian.org: '1 bug tagged help in the BTS', but no bug is open

2014-12-03 Thread Don Armstrong
Control: reassign -1 debbugs Control: affects -1 tracker.debian.org Control: retitle -1 Bugs in binary packages which have migrated from one source package to another show up in the wrong source package On Wed, 03 Dec 2014, Raphael Hertzog wrote: > On Tue, 02 Dec 2014, Don Armstrong wr

Bug#857423: link to sso page is broken

2017-03-15 Thread Don Armstrong
if BTS code > was also available. Right now it lists only copyright info - > https://www.debian.org/Bugs/ https://wiki.debian.org/Teams/Debbugs lists the git repos which have all of the code. -- Don Armstrong https://www.donarmstrong.com Identical parts aren't. -- Beach's Law

Re: [UDD] Request for new field in bugs table: done_date

2017-12-11 Thread Don Armstrong
osed or do you think it will end up > wontfix anyway? (I never filed a bug against debbugs ...) Please file it. At the very least, it will put in on my radar so I remember to include it in the BTS's SQL schema -- Don Armstrong https://www.donarmstrong.com life's not a paragraph And death i think is no parenthesis -- e.e. cummings "Four VII" _is 5_

Re: Bug#352104: source bugs bug, and how the PTS has a link for them which doesn't show anything

2006-02-16 Thread Don Armstrong
hink because of this bugs bug. There are no bugs listed because the bug in question was downgraded from grave to important: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=348240;msg=33 Don Armstrong -- "The question of whether computers can think is like the question of whether subma

Re: deluser on purge (was: Piuparts testing status update)

2006-11-14 Thread Don Armstrong
hey wanted to delete the user to easily cause the user to be deleted, and do so in an automated fashion. Don Armstrong 1: Granted, this best practice should probaly be codified in the Developer's Reference, not policy, but we could discuss it at the same time. -- It was said that life was ch

Re: suite tags (Re: Doing some stable QA work)

2008-08-15 Thread Don Armstrong
iness state above instead, defaulting to (testing distribution), sid. *** end proposal *** Does that meet the needs of the RMs et al? Are there any objections? Don Armstrong 1: It's quite likely that we talked about the way it should work, and I totally forgot about what we decided that it sho

Re: suite tags (Re: Doing some stable QA work)

2008-08-15 Thread Don Armstrong
On Fri, 15 Aug 2008, Luk Claes wrote: > Don Armstrong wrote: >> *** proposal *** >> >> For the purposes of determining buginess, setting a distribution tag >> limits the bugginess of a package in distribtions to the intersection >> of the distributions and

Re: suite tags (Re: Doing some stable QA work)

2008-08-15 Thread Don Armstrong
g? Not automatically, but it's not like doing this manually in a single shot is hard. Don Armstrong -- Only one creature could have duplicated the expressions on their faces, and that would be a pigeon who has heard not only that Lord Nelson has got down off his column but has also been

Re: UDD BTS import broken

2008-09-19 Thread Don Armstrong
On Fri, 19 Sep 2008, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: > The BTS mirror on merkel is missing /org/bugs.debian.org/pseudopackages/ > , and that causes the BTS import to fail. > > [EMAIL PROTECTED], could you please fix that? This has been resolved now. Don Armstrong -- Certainly the ga

Re: For those who care about bts-link: call for adoption

2009-01-09 Thread Don Armstrong
d in maintaining it, I'd be happy to see it deployed on the master BTS server. I suppose it can live on merkel for the time being until you're ready to migrate it, but having it under the debbugs umbrella would be good. [Not that I'd be actually touching it much, because my python-fu[1

Re: [udd] missing bugs

2010-01-21 Thread Don Armstrong
On Thu, 21 Jan 2010, Julius Davies wrote: > I'm curious to see the "Debbugs::Bugs" code. Where can I find this package? > > I tried "apt-get source debbugs" but I couldn't find it in there! http://bugs.debian.org/debbugs-source/mainline/Debbugs/Bugs.pm

Bug#585740: Bug#590931: See our D2R wrapper for UDD that provides RDF for Debian artifacts - Was: Re: Bug#590931: Would be great to integrate RDFa metadata into debbugs pages

2010-07-30 Thread Don Armstrong
entually? [I'm also interested in trying to make sure that whatever inter-bug-tracker formats we settle on exporting are more widely supported, as my time to understand and implement format translators is relatively limited.] Don Armstrong -- Three little words. (In descending order of im

Re: binary -> source mapping file from the BTS

2010-09-19 Thread Don Armstrong
file, which you can rsync directly from the BTS (rsync://bugs-mirror.debian.org/bts-versions/indices/binsrc.idx). [You should also be able to directly rsync the sources file using rsync://bugs-mirror.debian.org/bts-spool-indexes/sources .] Don Armstrong -- We have to face the fact that eith

Re: binary -> source mapping file from the BTS

2010-09-20 Thread Don Armstrong
e BTS needs.] I'm not sure exactly what qa.debian.org needs, but I'm assuming it's similar to what the BTS requires. Don Armstrong -- Build a fire for a man, an he'll be warm for a day. Set a man on fire, and he'll be warm for the rest of his life. -- Jules Bean http

Re: binary -> source mapping file from the BTS

2010-09-24 Thread Don Armstrong
On Fri, 24 Sep 2010, Raphael Hertzog wrote: > On Sun, 19 Sep 2010, Don Armstrong wrote: > > (rsync://bugs-mirror.debian.org/bts-versions/indices/binsrc.idx). [You > > should also be able to directly rsync the sources file using > > rsync://bugs-mirror.debian.org/bts-spool-inde

Re: [UDD] Bug importer is missing files

2012-02-15 Thread Don Armstrong
probably guess this better in the BTS than I do currently, but that's why it's throwing those error messages. [For those following along at home, to fix, we'd do this: bts found 48057 openssh/1:4.2p1-5 , notfound 48057 openssh-client/1:4.2p1-5 ; ] Don Armstrong -- If I had a letter, s

Re: [UDD] Bug importer is missing files

2012-02-15 Thread Don Armstrong
On Thu, 16 Feb 2012, Paul Wise wrote: > On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 2:59 AM, Don Armstrong wrote: > > > [For those following along at home, to fix, we'd do this: > > bts found 48057 openssh/1:4.2p1-5 , notfound 48057 openssh-client/1:4.2p1-5 > > ; ] > > Why wou

Re: UDD bugs stale?

2012-03-19 Thread Don Armstrong
ecommend we fix this? One way would just be to cp /org/bugs/debian.org/etc/config foo; DEBBUGS_CONFIG_FILE="foo"; blah blah blah; another would be to convince me that what I did out of an abundance of caution wasn't particularly useful (which could be true.) Don Armstrong -- Wh