Hi,
Last year I did a QA upload of ncpfs, however there was an Ubuntu bug
reported when it landed in Ubuntu that gcc changes caused it to break:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/328020
Steven Harms proposed a patch for the package, so I am submitting it
here for inclusion in Debian.
I must
On Thu, 2009-01-15 at 17:14 +0100, Andreas Tille wrote:
On Thu, 15 Jan 2009, James Westby wrote:
Some fixes had built up in Ubuntu's ncpfs package, and as the package
is QA maintained I rolled a proposed update for Debian. Would someone
kindly review and sponsor my package at
http
Hi,
Some fixes had built up in Ubuntu's ncpfs package, and as the package
is QA maintained I rolled a proposed update for Debian. Would someone
kindly review and sponsor my package at
http://people.ubuntu.com/~jamesw/packages/ncpfs_2.2.6-6/ncpfs_2.2.6-6.dsc
I haven't been able to test it in
Package: xmcd
Version: 2.6-21
Severity: normal
Tags: patch
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: origin-ubuntu jaunty ubuntu-patch
Hi,
open(2) states that a mode must be specified when the O_CREAT flag
is specified, there are a few cases where you package does not do
that.
Attached is a patch to
Package: gnuift
Version: 0.1.14-9
Severity: normal
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: origin-ubuntu jaunty
Hi,
As shown at
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/19643691/buildlog_ubuntu-jaunty-i386.gnuift_0.1.14-9_FAILEDTOBUILD.txt.gz
this package can fail to build as the libtoolize call will remove
severity 468825 serious
thanks
Hi,
It was pointed out to me that this actually violates Debian Policy,
section 4.8. I think this warrants a serious severity, but I'm not
absolutely sure that may not as used in that section is equivalent
to a must.
Thanks,
James
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
On Tue, 2008-04-01 at 18:38 +0200, Christian Perrier wrote:
Quoting James Westby ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
For the geneweb part I am Ccing Christian. Christian, do you know of
anybody that would be interested in the dag2html package? Would it
be worth contacting your upstream?
I don't
On Sun, 2008-03-30 at 11:14 +0900, Paul Wise wrote:
On Sat, Mar 29, 2008 at 9:48 PM, James Westby [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is it even worth it? It's buggy, has a popcon of 12, and hasn't seen an
upstream update since 2001?? My vote would be for removal.
I agree, and I haven't
On Wed, 2008-03-26 at 10:15 -0400, Barry deFreese wrote:
Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
On Tue, Mar 25, 2008 at 10:00:16PM +, James Westby wrote:
Would the pkg-ocaml team be willing to take it over
and make it build again? If not is it a valid candidate
for removal
Hi all,
The dag2html package is badly in need of some love
http://packages.qa.debian.org/d/dag2html.html
Would the pkg-ocaml team be willing to take it over
and make it build again? If not is it a valid candidate
for removal?
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=443029
The first
Package: bfr
Version: 1.6-1
Hi,
The bfr package contains hardlinks. In fact it links together
the upstream changelog and the Debian changelog. This is causing
some issues trying to represent the package in a VCS, and it
would be great if an upload could be done that removed the links.
Thanks,
Hi,
The bfr package is QA maintained, but has no bugs and 77 installs, 20
votes.
However the main reason for removing it would seem to be that the
functionality is provided by our trusty friend |
Anyone object to me filling a removal request?
Thanks,
James
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
Package: apt-spy
Version: 3.1-16
Hi,
apt-spy Build-Depends on libcurl3-openssl-dev, which is no longer a
package and is provided by libcurl4-openssl-dev. Rebuild tests of the
archive have presumably ensured that it builds with this, so it should
be safe to just move to the new package.
Thanks,
Package: adonthell
Severity: normal
Tags: patch
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: origin-ubuntu hardy
The attached patch from Matthias Klose fixes the package to work with
python2.5. The latest version can also be grabbed from
http://patches.ubuntu.com/a/adonthell/extracted/04_python2.5.diff
It
to cope with of this sort.
Thanks,
James
--
James Westby --GPG Key ID: B577FE13-- http://jameswestby.net/
seccure key - (3+)k7|M*edCX/.A:n*N!|7U.L#9E)Tu)T0AM - secp256r1/nistp256
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL
.
It has just been orphaned by the QA team, so you can go ahead and adopt
it now.
James
--
James Westby --GPG Key ID: B577FE13-- http://jameswestby.net/
seccure key - (3+)k7|M*edCX/.A:n*N!|7U.L#9E)Tu)T0AM - secp256r1/nistp256
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED
for a QA upload before I
realised how tough I was going to find these bugs. I have stalled work
on the packages, as without these bugs fixed it will not, nor should
not, be included in etch.
James
--
James Westby --GPG Key ID: B577FE13-- http://jameswestby.net/
seccure key - (3+)k7|M
/dirs is redundant here.
I cannot sponsor the package for you though.
James
--
James Westby --GPG Key ID: B577FE13-- http://jameswestby.net/
seccure key - (3+)k7|M*edCX/.A:n*N!|7U.L#9E)Tu)T0AM - secp256r1/nistp256
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject
On (16/09/06 21:34), Kapil Hari Paranjape wrote:
On Sat, 16 Sep 2006, James Westby wrote:
* The debian/copyright file is lacking. There is no copyright
information, what is referred to as Copyright is in fact a License,
and not a copy of a license header from the package.
I
wont be
installed with the binaries in many cases. I think this is more
important for the locales though.
Apologies for the extra stuff in the interdiff.
James
--
James Westby --GPG Key ID: B577FE13-- http://jameswestby.net/
seccure key - (3+)k7|M*edCX/.A:n*N!|7U.L#9E)Tu)T0AM
cycles it should be fairly
easy for you to rebuild some packages.
James
--
James Westby --GPG Key ID: B577FE13-- http://jameswestby.net/
seccure key - (3+)k7|M*edCX/.A:n*N!|7U.L#9E)Tu)T0AM - secp256r1/nistp256
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject
on automake
+
+ -- James Westby [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun, 2 Jul 2006 23:24:55 +0100
+
kdoc (2.0a54-3) unstable; urgency=low
* QA upload.
diff -u kdoc-2.0a54/debian/control kdoc-2.0a54/debian/control
--- kdoc-2.0a54/debian/control
+++ kdoc-2.0a54/debian/control
@@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
Source: kdoc
-Build
(charmap=UTF-8)
diff -u kdoc-2.0a54/debian/changelog kdoc-2.0a54/debian/changelog
--- kdoc-2.0a54/debian/changelog
+++ kdoc-2.0a54/debian/changelog
@@ -1,3 +1,10 @@
+kdoc (2.0a54-3.1) unstable; urgency=low
+
+ * Non-maintainer upload.
+ * Remove the unneccesary Build-Depends on automake
+
+ -- James
23 matches
Mail list logo
