Bug#468798: PTS: add Debian favicon to web interface

On Sat, Mar 01, 2008 at 04:36:52PM +0100, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote: > user [EMAIL PROTECTED] > usertag 468798 + pts > thanks > > On Sat, Mar 01, 2008 at 03:54:43PM +0100, Giovanni Mascellani wrote: > > Lower-than-low priority bug, but I like to see the nice Debian swirl > > also in the favicon of

Re: List of packages which should probably be Architecture: all

On Wed, Jan 02, 2008 at 09:04:44PM +0100, Pierre Habouzit wrote: > On Wed, Jan 02, 2008 at 07:58:24PM +, Raphael Geissert wrote: > > Russ Allbery <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >libgss-dbg (U) > >shishi-dbg (U) > > rrght... Those are buggy AFAICT not due to being arch:all, but due to a miss

Re: Bug#458329: PTS: don't show lintian link when there are no lintian warnings

On Mon, Dec 31, 2007 at 12:41:49PM -0800, Russ Allbery wrote: > Stefano Zacchiroli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > On Sun, Dec 30, 2007 at 10:10:35AM -0800, Russ Allbery wrote: > >> Note that you can tell whether a package has lintian warnings or errors > >> based on the contents of

Re: [Pkg-emboss-devel] Bug#435991: emboss-explorer: crontest failure find: /var/www/emboss-explorer: No such file or directory

On Sun, Aug 05, 2007 at 12:56:01PM +0900, Charles Plessy wrote: > Le Sat, Aug 04, 2007 at 04:05:47PM +0200, Filippo Giunchedi a écrit : > > it seems that emboss-explorer cron files are giving output when the > > package itself is removed (REMOVE) or its dependencies (AUTOREMOVE). > > Dear Filippo,

Bug#269493: regex for debian version

On Fri, Aug 03, 2007 at 04:48:41PM +0200, Bluefuture wrote: > > > > Still, a part of the bug here could still be addressed. What is needed is > > to > > scan for a dash from the end of the version string, and separate it there > > into 'debian revision' and 'upstream'. > > > > E.g. this versio

Bug#433469: PTS: please parse 'Homepage:' pseudo-header in the Descriptions...

On Wed, Jul 18, 2007 at 01:44:15AM +0200, Pierre Habouzit wrote: > On Tue, Jul 17, 2007 at 11:49:32PM +0200, Christoph Berg wrote: > > Re: Pierre Habouzit 2007-07-17 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > Please parse the Homepage: pseudo-header in the control's > > > descriptions, and display it in the packa

Bug#433469: PTS: please parse 'Homepage:' pseudo-header in the Descriptions...

On Tue, Jul 17, 2007 at 11:49:32PM +0200, Christoph Berg wrote: > Re: Pierre Habouzit 2007-07-17 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Please parse the Homepage: pseudo-header in the control's > > descriptions, and display it in the packages summaries, as it's already > > done with XS-Vcs-Browser. > > XS-* is

Re: Can we orphan dlocate?

On Wed, Apr 11, 2007 at 11:45:58PM -0400, Nathanael Nerode wrote: > The maintainer appears to have lost interest in the package (last upload > 1999). > It's also his only package; he is probably MIA. (I seem to remember him > being > very angry about Debian's decision to apply the Social Cont

Re: [idea] DDPO by mail

On Wed, Mar 07, 2007 at 04:09:57PM +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: > Hi, > > The goal of this mail is to describe a possible new tool in Debian: DDPO by > mail, and to start discussing its details and implementation. > > == Rationale == > > Many maintainers only maintain a few packages, which are i

Bug#409498: outdated bug graph

reassign 409498 qa.debian.org,www.debian.org thanks http://www.debian.org/devel/ also links to ajs bug graph. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#409498: qa.debian.org: outdated "Evolution of the number of bugs"

Package: qa.debian.org X-Debbugs-Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://qa.debian.org/ links to http://master.debian.org/~ajt/graph.png Evolution of the number of bugs But that image is at least 2 years old. Ideally it would be generated on qa/merkel. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] w

Bug#404475: qa.debian.org: [PTS] Please differentiate CSS titlelink class

Package: qa.debian.org Severity: minor Usertags: pts The "Source files" section of each packages' PTS page is actually a hyperlink, although I just noticed this by accident. It is very convenient, since it saves me from munging the URL for the dsc of the unstable version, to download the oldstab

Bug#398658: lintian: Please detect unconditional use of some nonessential pkgs during purge

Package: lintian Severity: wishlist On Tue, Nov 14, 2006 at 03:13:42PM -0500, Justin Pryzby wrote: > On Tue, Nov 14, 2006 at 08:07:27PM +0100, Frank Lichtenheld wrote: > > On Tue, Nov 14, 2006 at 06:44:38PM +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: > > > Here is a list of packages that fail

Re: Piuparts testing status update

On Tue, Nov 14, 2006 at 08:07:27PM +0100, Frank Lichtenheld wrote: > On Tue, Nov 14, 2006 at 06:44:38PM +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: > > Here is a list of packages that fail when all packages except essential > > ones, apt and debfoster wxhere removed, but didn't fail when all > > important&require

Re: [Help] Transition "Link in /usr/doc/"

On Tue, Jul 18, 2006 at 11:50:22AM +0200, Amaya wrote: > Hi there, Stefan > > Stefan Huehner wrote: > > i think lintian has a check for this issue. Please look into [1] if > > this is what you need. > > http://lintian.debian.org/reports/Tpostinst-should-not-set-usr-doc-link.html > > Great pointer

Re: A wish for the Package-Tracking-System

On Mon, Jul 03, 2006 at 02:19:54AM +0200, Jan Losinski wrote: > Hello, > > At first: Thank you for developing Debian, it's the greatest system I > ever used! > > Now I have a wish for the Package-Tracking-System: > Can you add a rss or atom-feed to it, so that I can see the latest > changes of th

Bug#370087: [OT] css (was Re: Bug#370087: marked as done (Please include the package description.))

On Fri, Jun 09, 2006 at 07:49:34PM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote: > Christoph Berg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > reopen 370087 > > thanks > > > > Re: Debian Bug Tracking System 2006-06-09 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >> >> Please include the packages description on packages.qa.debian.org. > >> >

Re: Orphaned packages with very low popcon numbers

On Mon, Jun 12, 2006 at 06:22:26AM -0400, Jose Parrella wrote: > Michael Stone escribi?: > > Well, at least you've learned why debian has so much obsolete junk--the > > "every package is sacred crowd" comes along every time this topic comes > > I think I've learned that, too. > > I don't really s

Re: transitional packages and upgrades?

On Fri, Apr 28, 2006 at 06:11:41PM +0200, Christoph Berg wrote: > Re: Stefan Huehner 2006-04-28 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > i've noticed that there are several packages in section oldlibs which > > where already transitional in sarge (i.e. > > shellutils,textutils,fileutils). > > These should not be ne

Bug#338048: hints description

retitle 338048 Please refer to DevRef for a discussion of testing hints reassign 338048 www.debian.org thanks There is a pretty-good description of hints here: http://www.debian.org/doc/developers-reference/ch-pkgs#s-details I think it is sufficient if devel/testing/ would reference that sectio

Re: confusing README in postgresql tutorial

On Sun, Apr 02, 2006 at 03:53:47AM -0400, kamaraju kusumanchi wrote: > In /usr/share/doc/postgresql-doc-8.1/tutorial/README it asks to do a > make to compile all the scripts and C files for the user-defined > functions and types. > > But there is no make file in /usr/share/doc/postgresql-doc-8.1

Re: help

On Thu, Mar 23, 2006 at 09:44:08PM -0600, John Morgan wrote: > I am interested in volunteering some time to help out with debian. I > don't have much expirence so to speak in programming or anything but I > am a quick learner and have some time to give. I was a system > administrator on a linux n

Bug#359942: qa.debian.org: No bug numbers are displayed

On Wed, Mar 29, 2006 at 08:06:03PM +0200, Jens Seidel wrote: > Package: qa.debian.org > Version: n/a; 2006-03-29 > Severity: minor > > Hi, > > I missed subversion 1.3 in testing and watched that's why > http://packages.qa.debian.org/s/subversion.html. I'm not sure what you mean here. I agree tha

Bug#359905: PTS: unsubscription fraud possible

On Wed, Mar 29, 2006 at 02:18:34PM +0100, MJ Ray (Debian) wrote: > Package: qa.debian.org > Severity: important > > Recently, I stopped receiving bug information via the PTS for > rsnapshot (with various consequences including an NMU). I > found nothing relevant in the PTS log files but I did see

Re: Bug#359110: PTS: Existing bugs not shown in PTS

On Sun, Mar 26, 2006 at 11:29:48PM +0200, Christoph Berg wrote: > Re: Miguel Gea Milvaques 2006-03-26 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > http://packages.qa.debian.org/d/dacco.html > > > > Shows that dacco has no errors, but this error: > > http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=358419 > > shows dac

Bug#357593: PTS: New package shown as old package

On Sat, Mar 18, 2006 at 01:27:59PM +0100, Miguel Gea Milvaques wrote: > Package: qa.debian.org > Severity: normal > > Hi, > dacco package has gone into unstable yesterday (17/3/2006), today has > been updated its pts page (http://packages.qa.debian.org/d/dacco.html) > but it's shown as old package

Re: Testing system upgrade from sarge to etch

On Wed, Mar 15, 2006 at 02:53:24PM +0200, Lars Wirzenius wrote: > ti, 2006-03-14 kello 21:52 -0500, Justin Pryzby kirjoitti: > > On Tue, Mar 14, 2006 at 10:02:06PM +0200, Lars Wirzenius wrote: > > What "optional" sarge packages aren't co-installable? > >

Re: Testing system upgrade from sarge to etch

On Tue, Mar 14, 2006 at 10:02:06PM +0200, Lars Wirzenius wrote: > I wrote a little script (attached) that creates a sarge chroot, installs > all packages of standard or higher priority, and then upgrades the whole > thing to etch. > > I've just ran it, and with the exception of lpr, there were no

Re: RM: oonsoo -- RoQA; orphaned for 500+ days, many alternatives

On Tue, Mar 14, 2006 at 08:55:46AM +0100, Raphael Hertzog wrote: > On Tue, 14 Mar 2006, Matej Vela wrote: > > It's just something I've started doing to make these bugs easier to > > ignore on . > > > > > I find this rather strange ... why not simply CC the

Bug#356776: PTS: lingering new upstream version todo

On Mon, Mar 13, 2006 at 04:50:00PM -0800, Russ Allbery wrote: > Package: qa.debian.org > Severity: minor > > The package tracking page at: > > http://packages.qa.debian.org/g/gnubg.html > > still says that a new upstream version was found, despite the fact that > I uploaded a Debian package

pts.d.o ?

Has anyone (recently) persued a dns record for pts.debian.org? It would only make sense to me, since this is a primary resource for developers, and I recall at one point someone indicating that they didn't use the PTS because of its obscure fqdn :) Justin -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PR

Bug#356730: qa.debian.org: developer.php has a bad link for "bug statistics"

Package: qa.debian.org Severity: normal developer.php has a link for "Bug Statistics": http://www.debian.gr.jp/~kitame/maint.cgi?num=srcs&limit=0&showpkgs=on&maint= but this link doesn't exist...indeed the host seems down. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsub

Re: RM: oonsoo -- RoQA; orphaned for 500+ days, many alternatives

On Mon, Mar 13, 2006 at 04:59:29PM +0100, Raphael Hertzog wrote: > On Mon, 13 Mar 2006, Matej Vela wrote: > > retitle 275774 RM: oonsoo -- RoQA; orphaned for 500+ days, many alternatives > > reassign 275774 ftp.debian.org > > block 202764 by 275774 > > block 356098 by 275774 > > Is this a new poli

Bug#354722: qa.d.o: Please make PTS point to pdo.debian.net until PDO works again

On Tue, Feb 28, 2006 at 03:02:24PM -, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > On Tuesday, February 28, 2006 1:56 PM, Justin Pryzby > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Package: qa.debian.org > > Severity: wishlist > > > > Please consider making the various PTS links point to p

Bug#354722: qa.d.o: Please make PTS point to pdo.debian.net until PDO works again

Package: qa.debian.org Severity: wishlist Please consider making the various PTS links point to pdo.debian.net until the real PDO works again. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

source bugs bug, and how the PTS has a link for them which doesn't show anything

PTS presently has a link: pygtk (source) is buggy! (1 > 0) => http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?which=pkg&data=pygtk&sev-inc=critical&sev-inc=grave&sev-inc=serious But there are no bugs listed, I think because of this bugs bug. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a sub

Bug#352200: PTS: please allow displaying bin NMUs

On Fri, Feb 10, 2006 at 12:40:57PM +0100, Christian Perrier wrote: > Package: qa.debian.org > Severity: wishlist > > >From IRC: > > 08:25 < bubulle> hmmm, /me wonders whether #352166 (shadow FTBFS on hppa) > shoul djust be closed or not. It seems > that there's been a binNMU this morning but I ha

Re: Bug#347624: DEHS: Error with a valid watch file

On Thu, Jan 19, 2006 at 03:23:34AM +0100, Bluefuture wrote: > The problem of this bugs is in ext_watch() (a dehs function) that seem > doesn't catch watch file in some cases. This function try extract the > watch file from the diff.gz of the package name submitted. > The function is quite simple a

Bug#348810: QA Developer summary page broken for duck account

On Thu, Jan 19, 2006 at 03:17:21AM +0100, Marc Dequ??nes wrote: > Package: qa.debian.org > Severity: important > > Look at this: > http://qa.debian.org/developer.php?package=slune&comaint=yes > > BTW, i'm to feed a bug against b.d.o for a similar problem. This is very > annoying to be unable

Re: xlibs-dev transition; packages with adjusted dependencies needing upload

79 bugs presently tagged patched: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/[EMAIL PROTECTED]:transition-xlibs-dev&repeatmerged=no&tagexcl=patch#_0_2_4 Yesterday I ran a for loop around all the xlibs-dev buggy packages, pbuiling with s/xlibs-dev/$(xlibs-split)/. There were plenty of failures, such as for

Re: Bug#347624: DEHS: Error with a valid watch file

On Tue, Jan 17, 2006 at 11:04:55PM +0100, Bluefuture wrote: > I have upgraded today dehs system to use the last official released > version of uscan in devscripts package 2.6.10. So it now support the > same features that uscan 2.6.10 Does this resolve #347624? -- Clear skies, Justin -- To UNS

Re: xlibs-dev transition; packages with adjusted dependencies needing upload

On Tue, Jan 17, 2006 at 10:52:25AM -0800, Marc Singer wrote: > On Mon, Jan 16, 2006 at 01:44:31PM -0800, Marc Singer wrote: > > On Sat, Jan 14, 2006 at 10:48:48PM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote: > > > Explanation for this problem is here: > > > > > > http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-autoconf/200

security bug needs upload along with xlibs-dev transition Re: Bug#346856: intent to upload sponsored NMU to fix xlibs-dev bug

On Mon, Jan 16, 2006 at 03:36:30PM -0800, Jacob Luna Lundberg wrote: > On Mon, Jan 16, 2006 at 05:45:44PM -0500, Justin Pryzby wrote: > > I intend to NMU a fix for this bug sponsored by some member of the QA > > group; patch attached. My pbuild result of this patch was clean, and

xlibs-dev transition; round 3; packages with adjusted dependencies needing upload

Uploads needed: Blessed === 346698 gnome-randr-applet 346729 jazip 346687 baken 346650 baycomepp 346900 twlog 346688 ibp Not blessed === 346716 groundhog 346707 flying 346705 gbase 346685 euler 346643 conky 346654 d4x 346899 twin 346884 oleo Please check the bug logs before uploading

Re: Is Brian Bassett MIA?

On Mon, Jan 16, 2006 at 12:45:31PM +0100, Thijs Kinkhorst wrote: > - Last upload 2004-04-02 Where do you get this information? -- Clear skies, Justin -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: NMU upload sponsor required for asciijump

On Mon, Jan 16, 2006 at 05:25:55PM +0530, Kapil Hari Paranjape wrote: > I have not been able to see why the config.* files in the top level > directories have changed. Presumably autotools are responsible. All > my changes to the source were restricted to the "debian/" directory. This is common pr

Is Christian Bayle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> MIA? Can we remove crystalspace?

Is Christian Bayle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> MIA? Can we remove crystalspace? 4 RC bugs Neither in testing nor the previous stable release -- Clear skies, Justin -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: xlibs-dev transition; helper script

Let me explain :) I created this script allowing many packages to be pbuilt and patched nearly automatically. It isn't intended to be fully automatic, because someone should actually read the .diff, of course. It runs pbuild using the recommended build-deps, and uses debdiff to assert that nothi

Is Alen Zekulic MIA? Can we remove felt?

Is Alen Zekulic MIA? Can we remove felt? Alen Zekulic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Last upload: 2004-06-01 Possible MIA maintainer felt 4 RC bugs Not in testing -- Clear skies, Justin -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: round 2 xlibs-dev transition; packages with adjusted dependencies needing upload

On Sun, Jan 15, 2006 at 09:51:03PM +0100, Thomas Viehmann wrote: > Justin Pryzby wrote: > > #347146: xlbiff > Today I'll only get that one, but take the liberty to fix this: > +Build-Depends: debhelper, libxaw7-dev (>> 4.0.3) (>> 4.0.3), xutils, > libxt-dev, x

Is Martin Albert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> MIA?

Is Martin Albert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> MIA? http://haydn.debian.org/~thuriaux-guest/qa/mia.html Last upload: 2004-07-06 http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?src=cthugha 2 rc bugs http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=294028 RC bug 1 year no response; -- Clear skies, Justin -

Can we remove cthugha?

Can we remove cthugha? FTBFS RC bug no response 1 year Probable MIA maintainer Not in testing If this is reasonable to someone else, please file the RM bug. -- Clear skies, Justin -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED

Re: native packages "hard to nmu"; xlibs-dev transition

tag 346970 - patch tag 346808 - patch tag 346801 - patch tag 346796 - patch thanks These packages are difficult to NMU because they are native when they should not be. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Can we remove xpcd?

Can we remove xpcd? Package reported obsolete upstream FTBFS bug no response Probable MIA maintainer Not in testing If this is reasonable to someone else, then file the RM bug. -- Clear skies, Justin -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Cont

Is Stephan A Suerken <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> MIA?

Is Stephan A Suerken <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> MIA? http://haydn.debian.org/~thuriaux-guest/qa/mia.html Last upload: 2004-08-02 http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?pkg=xpcd 2 rc bugs http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=295174 RC bug 1 year no response; http://bugs.debian.org/cgi

Re: elaboration on "hard to nmu packages"; xlibs-dev transition

On Sun, Jan 15, 2006 at 11:24:56AM -0500, Justin Pryzby wrote: > I also note the following packages are "hard" to NMU, because of some > problem like another FTBFS or the package being native when it should > not be. I'm untagging these 'patch' now. Let me ela

Re: round 2 xlibs-dev transition; packages with adjusted dependencies needing upload

Here are some more bugs needing uploads. This list includes packages which needed replacement direct dependencies, are tested in pbuilder, and have no changes reported by debdiff save for some version/size/depends stuff. Build logs are all available at http://justinpryzby.com/debian/xlibs-dev/

Re: xlibs-dev transition; packages with adjusted dependencies needing upload

On Sat, Jan 14, 2006 at 06:17:31PM +0100, Amaya wrote: > Hi there, Justin > > Justin Pryzby wrote: > > Each of the bugs tagged patch has a short note with the necessary > > change b-d. > > I intend to do this: > http://paste.debian.net/3743 > And I am very i

Re: xlibs-dev transition; packages with adjusted dependencies needing upload

On Fri, Jan 13, 2006 at 07:52:50PM -0800, Marc Singer wrote: > On Sat, Jan 14, 2006 at 01:07:36AM -0200, Gustavo Franco wrote: > > Justin Pryzby wrote: > > >Packages with RC bugs due to the xlibs-dev transition are listed at: > > > http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-

xlibs-dev transition; packages with adjusted dependencies needing upload

Packages with RC bugs due to the xlibs-dev transition are listed at: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/[EMAIL PROTECTED]:transition-xlibs-dev&repeatmerged=no&tagexcl=patch#_2_2_5 I've gone and figured out the updated dependences necessary for ~40 of them to build. So any sufficiently motivated QA

Bug#347624: dehs err message

The message you see at http://dehs.alioth.debian.org/wwiz_detail.php?id=1983522&type=watch as reported at http://lists.debian.org/debian-mentors/2006/01/msg00105.html indicates to me that it is very likely that DEHS doesn't know about http://sf.net/ syntax that uscan knows. -- Clear skies,

Bug#347624: DEHS: Error with a valid watch file

On Wed, Jan 11, 2006 at 05:28:09PM -0200, Nelson A. de Oliveira wrote: > At http://dehs.alioth.debian.org/maintainer.php?name=qsf, clicking to > view the watch file, it shows only this: > > version=3 > > But the watch file has one more line: > > version=3 > http://sf.net/qsf/qsf-(.*)\.tar\.gz >

Bug#344847: thuriaux's scripts & definite MIAs

Package: qa.debian.org Severity: wishlist Version: 20051226 On Mon, Dec 26, 2005 at 03:29:43PM -0500, Nathanael Nerode wrote: > So the scripts at > http://haydn.debian.org/~thuriaux-guest/qa > ROCK. Can we get them integrated into the main QA website perhaps? Agree. At least lets mention them s

Is Lars Steinke MIA?

On 2005-11-14, I filed grave bug #339056: "Library package fails to include shlibs file" [0] on package tktable-dev [1] , on which my package saods9 build-depends. I'm concerned about this bug because 1) its RC; 2) I haven't heard back in a month, despite pinging the maintainer last week; 3) My pa

Re: sf.php source

On Thu, Dec 08, 2005 at 08:03:44PM +0100, Jeroen van Wolffelaar wrote: > On Thu, Dec 08, 2005 at 08:00:30PM +0100, Thijs Kinkhorst wrote: > > On Thu, 2005-12-08 at 19:52 +0100, Jeroen van Wolffelaar wrote: > > > On Thu, Dec 08, 2005 at 01:44:05PM -0500, Justin Pryzby wrote: >

sf.php source

So, I figured out how to use CVS again, and looked at the source for . Is there any reason for implementation in PHP rather than with an apache redirect? -- Clear skies, Justin -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Tr

Bug#340863: same problem on bugs.d.o

# Crap, the first attempt was to [EMAIL PROTECTED] clone 340863 -1 reassign -1 debbugs retitle -1 debbugs: bug subscription and confirmation is noisy severity -1 wishlist thanks It should be possible to subscribe (and confirm) subscriptions to an arbitrarily large number of bugs with a single emai

Re: Bug#253973: Bug #253973: PTS: could send emails about testing migration

On Sun, Nov 27, 2005 at 09:38:03PM +0100, Henning Makholm wrote: > Scripsit Justin Pryzby > > > Have you considered mailing to pts news address? I don't mean static > > news, but I think the same place as the uploads go. > > It sounds like a good idea to me. Hm

Bug#332938: new upstream release / package tags

reassign 286177 qa.debian.org reassign 195121 qa.debian.org merge 332938 286177 195121 thanks Not that I have NOT merged 111068, because I think it has some potential which DEHS integration with packages.qa.d.o doesn't offer. But, its a related bug, thus on the Cc list. The other bugs are limited

Bug#335873: Bug#339922: packages.qa.debian.org/p/psutils.html doesn't show 1.17-20

merge 335873 339045 339922 thanks Jeroen, I'm merging these bugs .. I guess you know more about it and can unmerge if I'm wrong. -- Clear skies, Justin On Sat, Nov 19, 2005 at 12:31:56PM -0500, Jay Berkenbilt wrote: > Package: qa.debian.org > Severity: normal > > I recently uploaded version 1.

Bug#253973: Bug #253973: PTS: could send emails about testing migration

Have you considered mailing to pts news address? I don't mean static news, but I think the same place as the uploads go. Don't know if people would be agreeable, just a though.. -- Clear skies, Justin On Thu, Nov 17, 2005 at 12:53:11AM +0100, Henning Makholm wrote: > For the record of this bug

Bug#338048: *.d.o: Please document ftp hints

Package: qa.debian.org, ftp.debian.org, www.debian.org Severity: wishlist File: http://ftp-master.debian.org/testing/hints/ Please integrate documentation of the testing hints in useful places. I would suggest the following: http://packages.qa.debian.org/ might need a section to indicate when

Bug#293261: qa.debian.org: package bugs should also be against the package itself

elf > thanks > > Hello people, > > Sat, 4 Jun 2005 13:27:49 -0400, Justin Pryzby wrote: > > I think it would be sufficient to add header information to the > > package's bug page: > > > > Debian Bug report logs: package saods9 > > Mai

Re: Candidates for removal

On Thu, Sep 29, 2005 at 06:23:01PM +0200, Christoph Berg wrote: > Re: Justin Pryzby in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > Oddly, when I look up [EMAIL PROTECTED] (on > > > http://qa.debian.org/[EMAIL PROTECTED]), it thinks > > > his name is Takashi Okamoto. Somet

Re: Candidates for removal

On Thu, Sep 29, 2005 at 03:05:08AM -0400, Nathanael Nerode wrote: > These packages are candidates for removal > 1671 days: scandetd (0 waiting, new pkg, has RC bugs) [Bradley Alexander] > Potential removal bug already filed by Marc Brockschmidt more than 7 days > ago. Is it OK to reassign it

Re: I want to help in man pages

On Wed, Sep 21, 2005 at 03:06:24PM -0300, flavetz wrote: > Hi everybody, I want to introduce myself > > I'm from Brazil and currently running Debian AMD64 unofficial port on my > private Athlon 64 machine. > I started using Debian after a phew testings in another distributions and > find Debian

Re: Bugs, usertags, and including more people

On Wed, Aug 03, 2005 at 01:15:13PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote: > Margarita Manterola wrote: > > One of the things that I proposed in my talk during Debconf5 is to > > have a friendlier bug interface that allows for bugs to be sorted on > > the language (c, python, perl, etc) of the code, and the diffic

Re: request NMU for Stephen Stafford's apt-spy package

On Wed, Jul 27, 2005 at 04:37:47PM +0100, Stephen Stafford wrote: > Quoting Justin Pryzby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > Hi, > > Could someone consider NMUing apt-spy with at least that patch? > Sorry I've not had time to deal with this properly. I had hoped to >

request NMU for Stephen Stafford's apt-spy package

Hi, Stephen Stafford maintains apt-spy, which has RC bug #315120: "apt-spy: segfault with updated mirror list", for which I have a patch. Last we knew, he was moving to London and hoped somebody would NMU for him: http://lists.debian.org/debian-qa/2005/03/msg00026.html Could someone consider N

Is Thorsten Sauter MIA? (Was: Re: Interested in a Idesk package)

p you in this project. > > Thanks > > regards. > > > > > > > -- > To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > -- Justin Pryzby whois jgalt References [0] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: removal requests of unattended RC buggy packages?

On Tue, Jun 21, 2005 at 02:26:30AM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote: > Hi folks, > > I'm trawling the list of build failures on various architectures, and I'm > finding packages that have never, ever been successfully built on an > autobuilder from day one, in spite of bug reports being filed early and

Re: Not sure where this need to go?

On Mon, Jun 20, 2005 at 01:34:09PM -0500, Marcom, Greg wrote: > I was just installing Sarge (stable) on a new machine. Did a apt-get > install proftpd-common and I noticed a spelling error in the > configuration screen. The screen that asks if the server should be set > to inted or standalone, th

Re: Failure trying to install Sarge and Ubuntu on a new Compaq Presario

On Mon, Jun 20, 2005 at 12:08:47AM -0700, Xeno Campanoli wrote: > My problem seems to all be focused around failure of the CD/DVD RW > drive. This drive failed intermittently in three different places in > the Ubuntu install, for instance. I'm presently installing (shudder) > Red Hat, and that

Bug#314178: http://packages.qa.debian.org/g/gkrellm.html is broken

Has it been fixed? I recall the QA web page for a new package kind of "bootstrapping" itself; I wonder if that happened here (from some reason). Justin On Wed, Jun 15, 2005 at 12:04:33AM -0400, Filipus Klutiero wrote: > Package: qa.debian.org > Severity: normal > > http://packages.qa.debian.org

Is Tim Lear MIA?

Is Tim Lear MIA? http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=302894 Justin -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#304070: packages.qa.debian.org: shows empty page for nonexistent package

Same thing for http://packages.qa.debian.org/w/webmin-firewall.html, which *is* in debian, but is not a source package (webmin-extra). For some reason this page isn't caught by the "not a source package" trap. On Sun, Apr 10, 2005 at 07:21:20PM +0200, Thijs Kinkhorst wrote: > Package: qa.debian.o

Re: dehs will stop

On Wed, Mar 23, 2005 at 08:02:20PM +0100, Luk Claes wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > Hi Justin > > Justin Pryzby wrote: > [...] > | 1. Assert that every .orig.tar.gz which does not extract to > | foo_ver.orig/ is identical to t

Re: dehs will stop

Hmm. I quite like the dehs idea. Possibly there are no well-defined goals so far, but this is an area Debian as a whole could improve in. Here are some thoughts. 1. Assert that every .orig.tar.gz which does not extract to foo_ver.orig/ is identical to the one provided by upstream. 2. Keep

xtrlock security patch

Hi all, I created a 1-line patch to fix Bug#278191: "xtrlock unlocks upon very long input". I hope someone can upload an update? Justin -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Ideas for wnpp

Grettings, Last week I started looking into Debian packaging, and found myself at the wnpp page [1]. I spent some time browing the lists, especially RFP (Request For Package) and ITP (Intent To Package). At some point, I got discouraged because lots of these are inactive, (446 of the 831 being_p