Source: freelan
Version: 2.2-3
Severity: important
Tags: bookworm sid
User: pkg-openssl-de...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-3.0
Hi,
Your package is failing to build using OpenSSL 3.0 with the
following error:
Source: boxbackup
Version: 0.13~~git20200326.g8e8b63c-1
Severity: important
Tags: bookworm sid
User: pkg-openssl-de...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-3.0
Hi,
Your package is failing to build using OpenSSL 3.0 with the
following error:
NOTICE: Running test bbackupd in debug mode...
On Sat, Nov 10, 2018 at 11:34:41PM +0100, BERTRAND Joël wrote:
>
> I have changed _both_ values and I cannot connect to orange.fr or
> hotmail.com with sendmail. If I use stable package, sendmail runs as
> expected.
hotmail.com works with the default settings, it actually supports
TLS 1.2
The log shows:
> ERROR: SSL or crypto error: loading certificates from
> testfiles/clientCerts.pem: error:140AB18F:SSL
> routines:SSL_CTX_use_certificate:ee key too small
This is caused by a Debian change to require a 2048 bit key by
default instead of a 1024 bit key. Since this is just for a
On Sun, Dec 11, 2016 at 08:13:08PM +0100, Joerg Dorchain wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 11, 2016 at 12:57:06PM +0100, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> > >
> > > > Most reproduceable way I found by now is the DANE validator at
> > > > https://dane.sys4.de/, which leave a log entry e
On Sun, Dec 11, 2016 at 12:11:02PM +0100, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
> On 2016-12-11 11:22, Joerg Dorchain wrote:
> > following testing after upgrading from 8.15.2-6 to 8.15.2-7,
> > sendmail does not accept certain incoming connections anymore
> > and refuses the STARTTLS handshake with "ca md too
On Mon, Sep 05, 2016 at 10:02:43PM +0200, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
> On 2016-06-26 12:24:41 [+0200], Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> > If you have problems making things work, feel free to contact us.
>
> The patch attached fixes most of it.
> There are a few des ??? DES
On Mon, Sep 05, 2016 at 10:02:43PM +0200, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
> On 2016-06-26 12:24:41 [+0200], Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> > If you have problems making things work, feel free to contact us.
>
> The patch attached fixes most of it.
> There are a few des ??? DES
Source: subcommander
Version: 2.0.0~b5p2-5.1
Severity: serious
Hi,
Your package is failing to build because it doesn't build depend
on zlib1g-dev. It used to be pulled in by libssl-dev, but the
version in experimental no longer depends on it.
A log is available at:
Package: svn-buildpackage
Severity: withlist
Hi,
In my tarballs directory I have both a .tar.gz and .tar.gz.asc.
dpkg-buildpackage now has support for uploading those .asc file if
it's there but svn-buildpackage doesn't copy it to the build-area.
Kurt
On Fri, Jul 01, 2016 at 01:47:09AM +0200, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
>
> Since I'm used to neither openssl nor the sendmail source code (and I
> have no use for sendmail at all, now that it passes the piuparts
> tests), I'm not going to write a patch for supporting openssl 1.1.0
> along 1.0.2.
>
Source: wvstreams
Version: 4.6.1-8
Severity: important
Control: block 827061 by -1
Hi,
OpenSSL 1.1.0 is about to released. During a rebuild of all packages using
OpenSSL this package fail to build. A log of that build can be found at:
Source: virtuoso-opensource
Version: 6.1.6+dfsg2-3
Severity: important
Control: block 827061 by -1
Hi,
OpenSSL 1.1.0 is about to released. During a rebuild of all packages using
OpenSSL this package fail to build. A log of that build can be found at:
Source: turnserver
Version: 0.7.3-4
Severity: important
Control: block 827061 by -1
Hi,
OpenSSL 1.1.0 is about to released. During a rebuild of all packages using
OpenSSL this package fail to build. A log of that build can be found at:
Source: samdump2
Version: 3.0.0-3
Severity: important
Control: block 827061 by -1
Hi,
OpenSSL 1.1.0 is about to released. During a rebuild of all packages using
OpenSSL this package fail to build. A log of that build can be found at:
Source: sendmail
Version: 8.15.2-4
Severity: important
Control: block 827061 by -1
Hi,
OpenSSL 1.1.0 is about to released. During a rebuild of all packages using
OpenSSL this package fail to build. A log of that build can be found at:
Source: partimage
Version: 0.6.8-3
Severity: important
Control: block 827061 by -1
Hi,
OpenSSL 1.1.0 is about to released. During a rebuild of all packages using
OpenSSL this package fail to build. A log of that build can be found at:
Source: opencryptoki
Version: 3.4.1+dfsg-1
Severity: important
Control: block 827061 by -1
Hi,
OpenSSL 1.1.0 is about to released. During a rebuild of all packages using
OpenSSL this package fail to build. A log of that build can be found at:
Source: mod-authn-webid
Version: 0~20110301-4
Severity: important
Control: block 827061 by -1
Hi,
OpenSSL 1.1.0 is about to released. During a rebuild of all packages using
OpenSSL this package fail to build. A log of that build can be found at:
Source: httperf
Version: 0.9.0-5
Severity: important
Control: block 827061 by -1
Hi,
OpenSSL 1.1.0 is about to released. During a rebuild of all packages using
OpenSSL this package fail to build. A log of that build can be found at:
Source: ekg2
Version: 0.4~pre+20120506.1-12
Severity: important
Control: block 827061 by -1
Hi,
OpenSSL 1.1.0 is about to released. During a rebuild of all packages using
OpenSSL this package fail to build. A log of that build can be found at:
Source: ekg
Version: 1.9~pre+r2855-3
Severity: important
Control: block 827061 by -1
Hi,
OpenSSL 1.1.0 is about to released. During a rebuild of all packages using
OpenSSL this package fail to build. A log of that build can be found at:
Source: burp
Version: 1.3.48-4.1
Severity: important
Control: block 827061 by -1
Hi,
OpenSSL 1.1.0 is about to released. During a rebuild of all packages using
OpenSSL this package fail to build. A log of that build can be found at:
Source: boxbackup
Version: 0.11.1~r2837-2
Severity: important
Control: block 827061 by -1
Hi,
OpenSSL 1.1.0 is about to released. During a rebuild of all packages using
OpenSSL this package fail to build. A log of that build can be found at:
Source: anon-proxy
Version: 00.05.38+20081230-3
Severity: important
Control: block 827061 by -1
Hi,
OpenSSL 1.1.0 is about to released. During a rebuild of all packages using
OpenSSL this package fail to build. A log of that build can be found at:
Hi,
So you currently have:
#ifndef OPENSSL_NO_SSL2
%rename(sslv2_method) SSLv2_method;
extern SSL_METHOD *SSLv2_method(void);
#endif
%rename(sslv3_method) SSLv3_method;
extern SSL_METHOD *SSLv3_method(void);
%rename(sslv23_method) SSLv23_method;
extern SSL_METHOD *SSLv23_method(void);
On Sun, May 04, 2014 at 04:07:47PM +0200, Laurent Bigonville wrote:
Package: argyll
Version: 1.5.1-5+b1
Severity: normal
Hi,
Now that systemd has been selected as the default init system, all
session tracking is done via logind and consolekit is not needed
anymore.
So what about other
Package: argyll
Version: 1.5.1-3
Severity: important
Hi,
The manpages all look like:
DISPCAL:(1)
User Commands
DISPCAL:(1)
NAME
block DigiNotar]
On Monday 05 September 2011 14:55:50 Kurt Roeckx wrote:
On Mon, Sep 05, 2011 at 02:15:31PM -0500, Raphael Geissert wrote:
The only currently supported methods are OCSP and CRL, but none would do
the trick in this case.
I guess OCSP/CRL is only called for the top most
On Mon, Sep 05, 2011 at 02:15:31PM -0500, Raphael Geissert wrote:
On Sunday 04 September 2011 05:55:27 Kurt Roeckx wrote:
On Sun, Sep 04, 2011 at 12:02:48PM +0200, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
Their is also openssl-blacklist, but it doesn't seem to have
much users.
However, opensl-blacklist only
On Sun, Sep 04, 2011 at 01:37:19AM -0500, Raphael Geissert wrote:
Seems like it would be better if we also handled the issue at the libssl
level. OpenSSL maintainers: does that sound doable?
I'm not sure what you mean. We don't provide any certificates,
you need to tell openssl which certs
On Sun, Sep 04, 2011 at 12:02:48PM +0200, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
On Sun, Sep 04, 2011 at 01:37:19AM -0500, Raphael Geissert wrote:
Seems like it would be better if we also handled the issue at the libssl
level. OpenSSL maintainers: does that sound doable?
I'm not sure what you mean. We
reassign 623671 ca-certificates-java
thanks
On Fri, Apr 22, 2011 at 11:57:54AM +0530, shirish ? wrote:
Package: ca-certificates
Version: 20110421
Severity: normal
*** Please type your report below this line ***
Got few errors when it was installing the new cacertificates. Output
reopen 553473
thanks
* debian/control
- (Build-Depends): update to debhelper 7.1. Add version to
libc6-dev (Closes: #553473).
What you did was even worse, now it can't get build on some of the
arches where the package is not named libc6-dev bug just a virtual
package. You just
On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 09:56:00AM +0100, Mike Hommey wrote:
# For the last 4 packages, please check bug #557604.
# For the other packages, only a binNMU is necessary.
# (except that real binNMUs are not supported on arch:all packages)
It's not at all clear to me what people are expected to
Source: ivtools
Version: 1.2.6-1
Severity: serious
Hi,
There was an error while trying to autobuild your package:
Automatic build of ivtools_1.2.6-1 on excelsior by sbuild/amd64 98
Build started at 20090906-1809
[...]
Build-Depends: debhelper ( 5.0.0), quilt, x11-utils, xutils-dev,
Source: sysvbanner
Version: 1.0-14
Severity: serious
Hi,
There was an error while trying to autobuild your package:
Start Time: 20090503-2149
[...]
Toolchain package versions: libc6-dev_2.9-9 linux-libc-dev_2.6.29-3
g++-4.3_4.3.3-8 gcc-4.3_4.3.3-8 binutils_2.19.1-1 libstdc++6_4.4.0-1
Source: bogofilter
Version: 1.2.0-2
Severity: serious
Hi,
Your package is failing to build on sparc with the following
error:
/usr/bin/make check-TESTS
make[6]: Entering directory
`/build/buildd/bogofilter-1.2.0/obj-sqlite/src/tests'
../../../src/tests/t._abort: line 4: 1037 Aborted
Source: ecartis
Version: 1.0.0+cvs.20060813-1
Severity: serious
Hi,
ecartis is in main and it build-depends on latex2html which is in
non-free.
Kurt
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-packages-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact
Source: dfb++
Version: 1.0.0-4
Severity: serious
Hi,
Your package is failing to build with the following error:
idirectfb.cpp: In member function 'IDirectFB* IDirectFB::AddRef()':
idirectfb.cpp:40: error: cannot convert 'DirectResult' to 'DFBResult' in
initialization
idirectfb.cpp: In member
Source: fusionsound
Version: 1.0.0-3
Severity: serious
Hi,
Your package is failing to build with the following error:
playback.c: In function 'fs_playback_pool_create':
playback.c:85: warning: passing argument 4 of 'fusion_object_pool_create' from
incompatible pointer type
playback.c:85:
Package: wvstreams
Severity: serious
Tags: security
Hi,
I was looking at return codes for applications making use of
openssl functions and found this in crypto/wvx509.cc:
int verify_result = X509_REQ_verify(certreq, pk);
if (verify_result == 0)
{
debug(WvLog::Warning, Self
Package: mpg321
Version: 0.2.10.5
Severity: serious
Hi,
This package is failing to get removed:
Removing mpg321 ...
No alternatives for mpg123.
dpkg: error processing mpg321 (--purge):
subprocess pre-removal script returned error exit status 1
PS: Why does it have a native package version?
On Sat, Nov 01, 2008 at 06:29:10PM +0200, Guillem Jover wrote:
Hi,
On Wed, 2008-10-29 at 21:25:50 +0100, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
Kurt Roeckx wrote:
Package: lockvc
Version: 4.0.5-6
Severity: serious
It seems that lockvc sometimes segfaults on me. It's not doing it all
Package: lockvc
Version: 4.0.5-6
Severity: serious
Hi,
It seems that lockvc sometimes segfaults on me. It's not doing it all
time, but atleast once a week.
I'm setting it to serious since the console is unlocked at that point,
and so I consider it to be not useful at all.
I've switched to
On Sat, Sep 27, 2008 at 12:24:54PM +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
On 27/09/08 at 01:49 +0200, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
On Fri, Sep 26, 2008 at 01:10:52PM +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
(2) the way we deal with bugs affecting two (or more) packages.
That's a tricky problem. On one hand
Hi,
I'd like to make some minor changes the current udd schema:
- Make severity an enum instead of text:
CREATE TYPE bugs_severity AS ENUM ('fixed', 'wishlist', 'minor', 'normal',
'important', 'serious', 'grave', 'critical');
This would allow to make queries using something like
severity =
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.35
# Change from fixed tag to close with version info.
tags 380873 - fixed
close 380873 0.12-1.1
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.35
# Change from fixed tag to close with version info.
tags 373549 - fixed
close 373549 0.82-1.1
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Fri, Aug 15, 2008 at 01:41:26AM +0200, Frank Lichtenheld wrote:
Hi.
I had the idea to go through the list of RC bugs currently
believed by the BTS to affect stable and do some cleanup
work:
* Fix version information
* Mark by etch-ignore bus that are not affected in stable
for
On Thu, May 01, 2008 at 04:46:00PM -0400, Roberto C. Sánchez wrote:
On Thu, May 01, 2008 at 05:58:40PM +0100, Enrico Zini wrote:
On Thu, May 01, 2008 at 05:25:16PM +0200, Thijs Kinkhorst wrote:
Doesn't dak already send you an email when it processes an upload with
your
key? What
Package: saods9
Version: 4.0b7-2
Severity: serious
Hi,
Your package is failing to build with the following error:
g++ -Wall -g -O2 -DHAVE_SYS_UN_H -DHAVE_SYS_SHM_H -D_LARGEFILE64_SOURCE
-D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 -I/usr/include/tcl8.4 -o ds9 ds9.o ds9tk.o
/usr/lib/Tktable2.9/libTktable2.9.so -lz
Package: libfoundation-data
Version: 1.0.84-2
Severity: wishlist
Hi,
It seems that your package contains timezone information. We already
have a package that in Debian that provides timezone information:
tzdata. It would be nice that your package could be changed to use the
information from
Package: biococoa.app
Version: 1.6.0-6
Severity: serious
Hi,
Your package is failing to build with the following error:
/usr/bin/fakeroot debian/rules clean
debian/rules:5: /usr/share/quilt/quilt.make: No such file or directory
make: *** No rule to make target `/usr/share/quilt/quilt.make'.
Package: plr
Version: 1:8.2.0.7-3
Severity: serious
Hi,
Your package is failing to build with the following error:
dh_install -ppostgresql-8.2-plr --sourcedir=debian/tmp --fail-missing
dh_install: debian/tmp/usr/share/doc/postgresql-doc-8.3/contrib/README.plr
exists in debian/tmp/ but is not
On Wed, Jan 02, 2008 at 01:17:24PM -0600, Raphael Geissert wrote:
Hello all,
I've written a script which tries to detect packages which should be
architecture all based on the fact that they don't contain a Depends field.
Your list seems to contain alot of packages that do have a Depends
On Wed, Jan 02, 2008 at 01:58:24PM -0600, Raphael Geissert wrote:
Just to clarify to everybody, the list was screwed up by dd-list (my bad,
didn't see the '-b' option part). Thanks to Adeodato for pointing that out.
So, here's the list of binary packages (attachment is dd-list -u again).
On Wed, Jan 02, 2008 at 09:11:40PM +0100, Pierre Habouzit wrote:
On Wed, Jan 02, 2008 at 08:04:44PM +, Pierre Habouzit wrote:
On Wed, Jan 02, 2008 at 07:58:24PM +, Raphael Geissert wrote:
Russ Allbery [EMAIL PROTECTED]
libgss-dbg (U)
shishi-dbg (U)
rrght...
Package: libbinio1ldbl
Version: 1.4-8
Severity: serious
Hi,
I'm getting the following error:
Unpacking libbinio1ldbl (from .../libbinio1ldbl_1.4-8_amd64.deb) ...
dpkg: error processing
/home/buildd/build/chroot-unstable/var/cache/apt/archives/libbinio1ldbl_1.4-8_amd64.deb
(--unpack):
trying
On Fri, Nov 16, 2007 at 11:50:03AM +, Oliver Elphick wrote:
On Thu, 2007-11-15 at 18:58 +0100, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
I don't know why you think this was fixed, both 2.3-1 and 2.3-2
still have the problem.
It doesn't go wrong for me.
All buildd's have this problem. See
http
Package: libgnomeprint15
Version: 0.37-13+b1
Severity: serious
Hi,
It seems that gnome-print is not binNMU safe (see #432960) and it has
been binNMUd now. This results in it currently being uninstallable.
Kurt
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe.
Package: libjconv
Version: 2.8-5
Severity: serious
Hi,
The package is failing to build with the following error:
gcc -Wall -O9 -fPIC -DHAVE_CODESET -shared -Wl,-soname,libjconv.so.2 -o
libjconv.so conv.o info.o compat.o
gcc -Wall -O9 -fPIC -DHAVE_CODESET -o jconv jconv.o -ljconv
/usr/bin/ld:
On Thu, Mar 15, 2007 at 01:11:26AM +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
--- athcool-0.3.11/Makefile 2005-06-18 06:07:17.0 +0200
+++ athcool-0.3.11.dirty/Makefile 2007-03-13 19:07:57.048412605 +0100
@@ -20,7 +20,7 @@ CFLAGS = -O2 -Wall
DEFS= -I. -I$(includedir)
On Sat, Dec 23, 2006 at 10:09:28PM +0100, Filippo Giunchedi wrote:
btw, does someone how often Contents.gz is updated?
It currently seems to be about every 2.5 days.
They only do a few arches every day because it takes a long time to
generate it. Looking at my mirror log, it seems to be
Package: haskelldb
Version: 0.9.cvs.601-12
Severity: serious
Hi,
Your package is failing to build with the following error:
dh_shlibdeps -a
debian/mk-haskell-depends
make: execvp: debian/mk-haskell-depends: Permission denied
make: *** [binary-arch] Error 127
Kurt
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email
On Thu, Oct 12, 2006 at 06:34:10PM +0200, Romain Francoise wrote:
Lucas Nussbaum [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I started to work on a rebuild of all packages in etch inside an etch
environment. I used about 100 AMD64 nodes from the Grid'5000 project.
Nice. How much time would a complete
On Tue, Oct 10, 2006 at 05:07:28PM -0400, Nathanael Nerode wrote:
Ganesan Rajagopal wrote:
On Mon, Sep 25, 2006 at 09:49:57PM +0200, Christian Aichinger wrote:
As a start, I've written a script that searches for unnecessary
dependencies and reports them. Results are available here:
On Thu, Mar 02, 2006 at 02:05:31AM +, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
* Kurt Roeckx [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006-02-17 00:19]:
I'm rebuilding testing against testing to find such problems. I
think other people are doing the same with unstable.
Do you know whether there are any tools that make
On Thu, Feb 16, 2006 at 08:25:07PM +0200, Lars Wirzenius wrote:
Is there a list of what QA activites are being done, and by whom? I've
heard, for example, that some people test building of packages in
testing to find FTBFS errors that happen after the package has already
entered testing, or to
retitle 266387 RM: libtool1.4 -- RoQA; obsolete version
reassign 266387 ftp.debian.org
thanks
The last package build depending on it (freeradius) recently
removed the build dependency on libtool1.4, and has reached
testing now. There is no reason to still keep libtool1.4 around
anymore.
Kurt
Package: visualboyadvance
Version: 1.7.2-3
Severity: serious
Hi,
Your package is failing to build on some arches because g++ seems
to need lots of RAM. On arm and mipsel it failed with a message
like:
cc1plus: out of memory allocating 616522820 bytes after a total of 47400632 byt
es
make[3]:
Hi,
I do not see the static option you mention in libtool's --help
nor in any documentation. I have no idea where your question
comes from.
Could you please describe why you think there is any bug?
Kurt
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble?
On Tue, Sep 20, 2005 at 09:30:21PM +0200, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
Hi,
I do not see the static option you mention in libtool's --help
nor in any documentation. I have no idea where your question
comes from.
Maybe I should clarify myself, of course it has those options.
And it's show them
Package: haskelldb-bin
Version: 0.9.cvs.601-6
Severity: grave
Hi,
This package is currently uninstallable in sid because it still
depends on libgmp3 which has been replaced by libgmp3c2 because
of the C++ ABI transition.
Since ghc6 is installable again, I think a simple rebuid should
take care
On Sun, Aug 28, 2005 at 10:39:25AM +0200, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
[Kurt Roeckx]
It's trying to print the address. In C, with printf, you'd use a %p
for it. I have no idea if std::cout has something simular.
Is this the only place this is happening? Did it compile when this
line
Package: vrweb
Version: 1.5-12
Severity: serious
Hi,
Your package is failing to build on 64 bit arches with the
following error:
g++ -O -O -DLINUX_ELF -DVERBOSE -DASSERT -Dcplusplus_2_1 -DInterViews -Div_nls
-DOSMajorVersion=2 -DOSMinorVersion=0 -DLINUX -DHG_OSMaj=2 -DHG_OSMin=0
Package: ts10
Version: 0.8.030519-1
Severity: serious
Hi,
Your package is failing to build on a few arches with the
following error:
On ARM, IA644 and mipsel:
gcc -Wall -g -O2 -c -DHAVE_SIGACTION -DDEBUG -I.. socket.c
socket.c: In function 'sock_Close':
socket.c:265: warning: implicit
Hi Florian,
Thanks for doing all of this, since it was rather manual work for me.
Afaik, there are 3 kind of problems with zlib:
- It's build-depending zlib, but linking staticly
- It has it's own copy of zlib, and links staticly to it
- It has it's own copy of the zlib package (ia32-libs,
Package: kernel-patch-usagi
Version: 0.0.20030929.SNAP-2.1
Severity: grave
Hi,
This package does not work with any kernel currently in Debian.
It has a patch for kernel 2.4.22, which does not apply at all to
the current kernel. The major problem is that the Debian 2.4
kernel's ipsec patch
On Fri, Mar 18, 2005 at 10:27:53PM +0100, David Schmitt wrote:
On Friday 18 March 2005 19:37, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
One of my goals for etch is getting rid of all old libtool
versions.
I'm still wondering on how exactly I'm going to do this. But I
am thinking about getting all those
Package: snacc
Version: 1.3bbn-6
Severity: important
snacc fails to build on amd64 with the following error:
creating snaccC
./snaccC -c -t -e -u ../../asn1specs/asn-useful.asn1 ../../asn1specs/tbl.asn1
make[4]: *** [tbl.c] Segmentation fault
Core was generated by
Package: libctk
Version: 3.0.24.5
Severity: serious
It's failing to build on all buildds. From the buildd logs:
(cd ctk chmod +x autogen.sh config.guess config.sub install-sh
\
ltconfig missing mkinstalldirs)
(cd ctk automake autoconf ./configure --prefix=/usr
SED=/bin/sed /u
82 matches
Mail list logo
