On 04/22/2012 02:29 PM, Holger Levsen wrote:
> Hi,
Hi Holger
> On Mittwoch, 11. April 2012, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
>> are there some guidelines how transitional packages should behave?
>> Do they need to be installable?
Yes, unless they don't need to transition to testing and be part of a
relea
Hi
On 08/06/2011 05:53 PM, Tim Retout wrote:
> yada was recently orphaned: http://bugs.debian.org/636735 - I would
> like to propose it for removal. I believe it is unlikely to find a
> maintainer.
>
> There is a serious bug affecting all packages built using yada - yada
> modifies the build-dep
On 01/22/2011 09:23 AM, Andreas Tille wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I just stumbled upon a problem which seems to be caused by a bug in
> upload_history
> importer:
>
> udd=# SELECT source, version, changed_by, fingerprint FROM upload_history uh
> WHERE source = 'freecad';
> source | version |
On 09/05/2010 08:14 PM, Peter Palfrader wrote:
> On Sun, 05 Sep 2010, Luk Claes wrote:
>
>>> merkel.debian.org, aka nm.debian.org, qa.debian.org, etc., has become
>>> increasingly unstable over the past few months. Due to upcoming changes
>>> in the hosting fo
On 09/05/2010 11:36 AM, Stephen Gran wrote:
> Hi,
>
> merkel.debian.org, aka nm.debian.org, qa.debian.org, etc., has become
> increasingly unstable over the past few months. Due to upcoming changes
> in the hosting for all the machines hosted at Fort Collins, we have
> decided to ask the hoster t
Package: piuparts
Version: 0.35
Severity: normal
Hi
Even though policy tells differently one cannot rely on dependencies to be
installed in postrm remove's target.
To make sure there are no other issues like the recently discovered in texlive,
it would be good to have an 'unpack, remove, purge
Hi
Is anyone interested in preparing the DDPO by mail campaign again?
DDPO by mail is used to warn maintainers by email about testing
migration (and other) issues concerning their packages.
The code can be found on svn://svn.debian.org/svn/collab-qa/ddpo-by-mail
and should be converted to use UD
Andreas Tille wrote:
> On Sat, 14 Mar 2009, Roland Rosenfeld wrote:
> Metaquestion: I wonder whether it might make sense to start an
> inter-distribution effort to manitain patches against software
> orphaned upstream. Examples to my knowledge are Midnight Commander
> (even if recently something
Eder L. Marques wrote:
> Luk Claes escreveu:
> The txt2tags upstream contact me, saying that he tried to contact the
> package maintainer, but didn't have success.
>
> After, I followed the procedure described on Debian Developers
> Reference[1] before mail the mia/q
Eder L. Marques wrote:
> Ping 2.
>
> Is the MIA team MIA?
No, it seems the maintainer is active, but maybe is not taking as much
care of txt2tags as you want.
> I am trying during 7 months to update a package and fix some bugs, but
> without any answer...
I think it's strange that you have not
Marco Rodrigues wrote:
> Hi again!
>
> Looks like popcon is dead at qa.debian.org, it doesn't work for any package.
>
> But it would be nice to have some message when it's not working, when it
> can't get any popcon information for some reason.
popcon.debian.org was not available, it should get
Frank Lichtenheld wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 14, 2009 at 06:19:19PM +0100, Luk Claes wrote:
>> Frank: data/stats/output_stats refers to your home directory, can you
>> please integrate the needed things in the qa repository itself and
>> update it for the release, TIA.
>
> I
Hi
I've updated quite a bit in the qa repository to match with the
situation after the release. It will only be checked out on merkel
tomorrow though as today not everything will be ready yet (unless I get
a pile of cron mails earlier ;-)).
We should probably make some central place to tell what
Hi
Maybe this package should be removed from unstable?
Cheers
Luk
Jonathan Wiltshire wrote:
> I have just been trying to make roaming wireless work on my laptop and
> came across waproamd, which sounded great. However, further digging
> reveals that it has been obsoleted upstream and the origin
Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> On Sat, 20 Dec 2008, Sune Vuorela wrote:
>> On 2008-12-20, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
>>> maintainer receives a mail with a link to a web form where he'll have a
>>> list of all the packages that he maintains/co-maintains and for each
>>> package he has to answer several quest
Colin Watson wrote:
> Package: qa.debian.org
>
> http://wiki.debian.org/LowThresholdNmu says:
>
> 38. Colin Watson - (all packages) - except: base-passwd - Comaintainers
> welcome - check: base-passwd comaintainers are welcome
>
> However, http://packages.qa.debian.org/b/base-passwd.html says
Bernd Eckenfels wrote:
> Hello,
Hi
> please upload a new version of net-tools in order to complete the maintainer
> transition. There is some activity on the bugs, and the ppl ask for
> responses.
I intend to form a team to maintain the package, I'll upload a package
shortly.
Bernd: do you cont
Hi
In november there will again be a Debian QA meeting in Extremadura. It
will probably be from the 26th of November till the 30th of November.
This years meeting will at least be used for preparing tdebs into the
archive and into supporting tools. Therefor at least some FTP Team
members and i18n
Don Armstrong wrote:
> On Fri, 15 Aug 2008, Frank Lichtenheld wrote:
>> On Thu, Aug 14, 2008 at 08:08:10PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
>>> On Thu, Aug 14, 2008 at 11:01:46PM -0400, Filipus Klutiero wrote:
Tagging lenny and sid does not imply that other suites are free
from the bug,
>>> Y
Don Armstrong wrote:
On Fri, 15 Aug 2008, Frank Lichtenheld wrote:
On Thu, Aug 14, 2008 at 08:08:10PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
On Thu, Aug 14, 2008 at 11:01:46PM -0400, Filipus Klutiero wrote:
Tagging lenny and sid does not imply that other suites are free
from the bug,
Yes, it does.
It
Steve Langasek wrote:
On Fri, Aug 15, 2008 at 12:01:26AM -0300, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
- O: bugs are now RC, so packages are removed from testing using the
release team's existing policies. Which means that some O: packages
might stay in testing for a longer time because they are dependencies
Raphael Geissert wrote:
> I currently don't have enough time to write a script that gathers the
> versions information from the origin package to use when MBR. But here is
> what I believe needs to be done:
>
> * Encourage package maintainers to keep the old changelog around (e.g.
> php5's chang
Sandro Tosi wrote:
> Hi Thijs, QA Team,
>
> On Thu, May 15, 2008 at 1:03 AM, Thijs Kinkhorst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> I recently stubled over an transitional package in etch that was still in
>> lenny. I could have filed a bug but wondered if there was any
>> structural "scan" being done on p
Filippo Giunchedi wrote:
> Hi,
> just annoyed by repeated cron files output from removed packages I
> implemented a
> new test for packages: no output from cron files of removed packages.
>
> The interesting bit is here:
> http://qa.debian.org/~filippo/crontest/20070801-crontest.log
>
> the log
Amaya wrote:
> I looked at every package listed in:
> http://qa.debian.org/debcheck.php?dist=sid&list=main%2donly%2drelationship%2dRecommends&arch=EVERY
>
>
> And I came up with a summary of what packages in main recommed stuff not
> currently in main. I would welcome help in filing the bugs, an
Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> On 29/03/08 at 01:59 +0100, Luk Claes wrote:
>> Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
>>
>>>> PROP_RM bugs could be RC severity, but if so I would remove the
>>>> mentioning of orphaning in the template so it's clear for everyone that
>>>
Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
>> PROP_RM bugs could be RC severity, but if so I would remove the
>> mentioning of orphaning in the template so it's clear for everyone that
>> it should not be used lightly and strong arguments are needed for
>> orphaning instead of removal...
>
> I would personally prefer
Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> On 27/03/08 at 10:12 +, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
>> Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
>>
>>> severity 453487 serious
>> Bug#453487: Should this package be orphaned?
>> Severity set to `serious' from `important'
>
> Hi,
Hi
> We really need to clarify
Andrew Pollock wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 20, 2008 at 05:59:14PM +1100, Aníbal Monsalve Salazar wrote:
>> On Thu, Mar 20, 2008 at 04:37:39PM +1000, Andrew Pollock wrote:
>>> I was just trying to fix up a watch file for simpleproxy, which is hosted on
>> I use (for beecrypt):
>>
>> cat debian/watch
>> ver
Sune Vuorela wrote:
> On 2008-02-06, Luk Claes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Sune Vuorela wrote:
>>> On 2008-02-05, Moritz Muehlenhoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>>> I've uploaded a version of imlib that fixes an important and RC bug. If
Sune Vuorela wrote:
> On 2008-02-05, Moritz Muehlenhoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> I've uploaded a version of imlib that fixes an important and RC bug. If
>>> someone has time to review/sponsor.
>> You should rather spend your time to get this package removed in favour
>> of imlib2 than kept
tim hall wrote:
> Luk Claes wrote:
>> Jack T Mudge III wrote:
>>> On Monday 14 January 2008 07:13:01 am Riku Voipio wrote:
>>>> It's not only lack of 64bit that makes xview a problem. If security
>>>> issues withing xview are found, it is unlik
Jack T Mudge III wrote:
> On Monday 14 January 2008 07:13:01 am Riku Voipio wrote:
>> It's not only lack of 64bit that makes xview a problem. If security
>> issues withing xview are found, it is unlikely that they get fixed
>> in a timely manner.
>
> Sometimes I wish there were a security warning
Paul Wise wrote:
> On Jan 10, 2008 3:37 AM, Luk Claes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> Hmm, debian-qa is not a maintainer, it's not like the QA Team maintains
>> packages, it is only a go-between maintainers IMHO. I don't really get
>> the part ab
tim hall wrote:
> Lars Wirzenius wrote:
>> On ke, 2008-01-09 at 11:10 +0100, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
>>> This is my context, but my question is generic. How are packages
>>> maintained by developers that resign handled, and how should they be
>>> handled.
>>
>> Why should they be handled differ
Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
> More than a year ago, Matthew Garrett resigned from Debian. His
> decision is explained in
> http://mjg59.livejournal.com/66647.html>. He still is listed as
> the maintainer of several packages on
> http://qa.debian.org/[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
> and seem to kind of mainta
Russ Allbery wrote:
> Luk Claes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>> So, libglib1.2ldbl, libgtk1.2 and maybe libgd2-xpm would qualify to be
>> included?
>>
>> Do you want me to file a bug to include them or is mentioning them over
>> here enough?
>
>
Russ Allbery wrote:
> Luk Claes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>> So, libglib1.2ldbl, libgtk1.2 and maybe libgd2-xpm would qualify to be
>> included?
>
> libgd2-xpm isn't even in oldlibs and there's no hint in the package
> description that it should
Russ Allbery wrote:
> Luk Claes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> Russ Allbery wrote:
>
>>> Yes. If there are significant packages that become obsolete and
>>> warrant a lintian warning to aid in a transition, please file a
>>> wishlist bug against lin
Russ Allbery wrote:
> Kumar Appaiah <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> In particular, if some package enters or leaves a black/whitelist,
>> wouldn't a new lintian version be warranted in the current scheme of
>> things?
>
> Yes. If there are significant packages that become obsolete and warrant a
>
Barry deFreese wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> I am copying the games teams since I am a "member" and am currently
> focusing on orphaned or unmaintained games. In case anyone there wants
> to weigh in as well.
>
> I am looking a several of the games type packages that are orphaned or
> unmaintained and I
Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 06, 2007 at 08:39:24PM +0100, Luk Claes wrote:
>> Currently it seems that tbm,weasel,igenibel,aba,jeroen,myon,herzog have
>> sudo access to the qa user.
>
> I have access to the sudo qa user as well; where did you get this list?
Note t
Hi
Some people of the qa group seem to have sudo access to the qa user and
others do not. Is there any reason why not all members of the qa group
have this access?
Maybe we should try to remove the rather inactive members of the qa
group, add some new active members and get sudo access for the qa
Ana Guerrero wrote:
On Tue, Oct 23, 2007 at 07:32:34AM +0200, Luk Claes wrote:
Ana Guerrero wrote:
Hi folks,
what is the best way to handle people who are clearly MIA, but they still
appear like co-maintaining packages? I'm sure we even have cases of
packages
apparently co-maintaine
Ana Guerrero wrote:
Hi folks,
what is the best way to handle people who are clearly MIA, but they still
appear like co-maintaining packages? I'm sure we even have cases of packages
apparently co-maintained but with 2 MIA maintainers..
For example:
http://qa.debian.org/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I was a
Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
On 10/10/07 at 11:35 +0200, Luk Claes wrote:
Proposed workflow
-
Suspicious packages are found by combining different metrics into a
scoring system:
[...]
- number of RC bugs
I would rather use these criterion as a yes/no criterion than a number
On Wed, Oct 10, 2007 at 03:53:48PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 10, 2007 at 04:13:53PM +0200, Luk Claes wrote:
>
> > That's of course the other way around.
>
> The original list only talked about feeding the MIA status in, not how.
Let me rephrase: there is
Mark Brown wrote:
On Wed, Oct 10, 2007 at 11:35:36AM +0200, Luk Claes wrote:
Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
- Maintainer's MIA status
This is also outside the scope of the proposal IMHO as MIA maintainers and
their packages are already covered by the MIA team.
On the other hand if a packag
Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
Hi,
Hi Lucas
Current status
--
Michael Ablassmeier and me filed some bugs some time ago on packages
that were good candidates for orphaning or removal from Debian. The list
can be viewed at [1]. However, we haven't orphaned/removed the packages
so far.
Only
Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
Hi, maybe I'm proposing something obvious or already attempted in the
past here, ... but let's try anyway!
In order to spread the adagio that ``every DD is Debian QA'', what about
uploading to the collab-maint subversion repository on alioth [1] all
the orphaned package
Laurent Bigonville wrote:
> Hi,
>
> What the status this bug?
> I've made a sposorised NMU and the package still not appears on my qa
> page...
Some people don't like sponsored NMUs. Personally I treat sponsored NMUs as
normal NMUs, the sponsor is fully responsible for the upload, the sponsoree
w
Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> On Tue, 17 Jul 2007, martin f krafft wrote:
>> also sprach Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007.07.17.1642
>> +0200]:
>>> The configuration has been lifted for the bounce handler. The
>>> special header is still required for any non d.o machine. But it's
>>
retitle 318201 RM: ibwebadmin -- RoQA; RC-buggy; unmaintained; no users
reassign 318201 ftp.debian.org
severity 318201 normal
thanks
Thijs Kinkhorst wrote:
Hi all,
Hi Thijs
I propose to remove ibwebadmin for the following reasons:
* Last maintainer upload Sep 2004;
* Orphaned since Jul 2005
Mikhail Gusarov wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Text on http://qa.debian.org/ states
>
> "The Debian Project is currently working on a release of the next version,
> codenamed etch."
>
> which is slightly outdated :)
I have updated the pages (even correcting a typo in a variable that was used
all over the pla
the
> numerous alternatives). So I suggest removing it from Debian instead. (Of
> course, feel free to fix it.)
>
> Oh, and there hasn't been an upstream release since 1999.
I support the removal request.
Cheers
Luk
--
Luk Claes - http://people.debian.org/~luk - GPG
Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
Hi,
Hi
I've just finished a full rebuild of sid/i386 on Grid'5000, so I now
have a list of failures that need investigation.
Nice, do you also have one for eth/i386, that would be more interesting
this near to the release?
Thanks already :-)
Cheers
Luk
--
To UNS
Kapil Hari Paranjape wrote:
Hello,
Regarding conflicts like that between "slang-slirp" and "slirp".
(see recent bugs filed by Michael Ablassmeier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
).
I feel that this a currently an area not addressed by policy
sufficiently wel
have already a bug filed or are solved by binNMUs. I'm focussing
on i386 because that's the system I mostly work on... I would always welcome
some not too slow hardware of another architecture :-)
Cheers
Luk
--
Luk Claes - http://people.debian.org/~luk - GPG key 1024D/9B7C328D
Fi
se do request it's removal. I meant to get around to that earlier,
but I didn't get a chance. The package has no dependencies or build
dependencies, and there are better replacements, so I think it's a good
idea to remove it.
--
gram
--
Luk Claes - http://people.debian.org/~luk
), dead upstream (last release in 2004) and has very
> few users.
No votes according to popcon...
Cheers
Luk
--
Luk Claes - http://people.debian.org/~luk - GPG key 1024D/9B7C328D
Fingerprint: D5AF 25FB 316B 53BB 08E7 F999 E544 DE07 9B7C 328D
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Hi
sfio and doxymacs have both a RC bug for more than 250 days holding them
out of testing. They also have almost no (max 15) votes according to popcon.
If anyone object, speak up, otherwise I'll reassign the O-bugs asking
for removal...
Cheers
Luk
--
Luk Claes - http://people.debia
w
> instalations of the package.
>
> As not all packages use debhelper, I also have no idea how to handle
> this globally.
Isn't this one of the use cases of piuparts?
Cheers
Luk
--
Luk Claes - http://people.debian.org/~luk - GPG key 1024D/9B7C328D
Fingerprint: D5AF
but
> please put it explicitly in your list then.
No, that would be good for packages that are maintained IMHO.
Cheers
Luk
--
Luk Claes - http://people.debian.org/~luk - GPG key 1024D/9B7C328D
Fingerprint: D5AF 25FB 316B 53BB 08E7 F999 E544 DE07 9B7C 328D
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
ned
already a couple of times before a package would be filed for removal! I
don't get why that has to repeated every time again?
Cheers
Luk
[1]:
(a) aren't ITAed, and
(b) have been orphaned for more than, say, three months
(c) don't have some special reason why popcon would be unrep
in the archive that deliver
>similar functionality.
This could be looked at, though I don't know if it's worth the trouble
for almost unused packages. Though I'm sure ftp-master would decide on
that if we would ask for removal...
> In other cases, IMO, it's a lot
Jamie Wilkinson wrote:
> This one time, at band camp, Luk Claes wrote:
>> How can we be sure the packages are of decent quality if almost noone
>> uses them? How can we be sure there are (almost) no unreported RC bugs
>> for instance?
>
> If a tree falls in a forest,
;
> Well, as long as there are no RC bugs, and the packages are in testing,
> I really see no need to remove them. Even if only a few people use the
> package, why annoy them by removing it from Debian?
How can we be sure the packages are of decent quality if almost noone
uses them?
ems with the stable release updates by the way
as very capable persons have already taken over...
Cheers
Luk
--
Luk Claes - http://people.debian.org/~luk - GPG key 1024D/9B7C328D
Fingerprint: D5AF 25FB 316B 53BB 08E7 F999 E544 DE07 9B7C 328D
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
version in sid fixes this problem, i.e. if the
> planned NMU will be uploaded indeed etc. pp.
The planned upload was already uploaded and has already migrated to
testing... It has version number 1:5.13-2.2
Cheers
Luk
--
Luk Claes - http://people.debian.org/~luk - GPG key 1024D/9B7C328
s this just a bug in the qa scripts, or worse?
It's just a matter of britney not been running the last couple of days
AFAIK (though it has run today... so it will probably be shown as 1 days
old tomorrow?).
Cheers
Luk
--
Luk Claes - http://people.debian.org/~luk - GPG key 1024D/9B7C328D
Fi
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi
The following packages have 0 or 1 user according to popcon (at Debconf
time). Maybe some of them can be removed?
I was so free to exclude clear cases of:
* l10n packages
* new packages
Note that the RC bugs are integrated in total bug count:
On Thu, 28 Apr 2005, Andrew Pollock wrote:
> Hi,
Hi Andrew
> openwebmail is orphaned, but has only been so for 32 days.
>
> That said, it's got security issues, and hasn't been part of a stable
> release.
>
> So I'm personally inclined not to let it linger for a while on the grounds
> that it's
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
This is a cunning plot to increase interest in Quality Assurance among
Debian contributors.
There will be a QA Hacking event preceding Debconf5 [1] in Helsinki.
Those who want to participate, please sign up here:
http://wiki.debian.net/?DebianQA
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Justin
Justin Pryzby wrote:
[...]
| 1. Assert that every .orig.tar.gz which does not extract to
| foo_ver.orig/ is identical to the one provided by upstream.
[...]
| 1 is a safety measure. It prevents people from using a nonoriginal
| .orig, fo
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Andrew
Andrew Pollock wrote:
| retitle 298388 RM: enbd -- orphaned, RC bug, upstream uncontactible
Isn't that supposed to be RoQA as you are not the maintainer? Or is it
RM because the package is orphaned?
Cheers
Luk
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Ver
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Martin Zobel-Helas wrote:
| Hi List,
Hi Martin
| as you might have read from my privious mails, we currently plan a
| Debian QA Meeting in Darmstadt/Germany. This will be in addition to
| some QA Hacking @ debconf (Luk Claes offered to organize that
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Martin Zobel-Helas wrote:
| Hi Luk, hi List,
Hi Martin, hi list
|>No, not that I know of. There was an idea to organise a seperate
|>QA meeting in Germany in August (I think Martin Zobel-Helas had
|>the idea? I don't know/remember if he plans to come to
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Andreas Barth wrote:
| * Luk Claes ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [050318 16:25]:
|
|>No, not that I know of. There was an idea to organise a seperate
|>QA meeting in Germany in August
|
|
| I think a QA hack fest and the QA meeting are overlapping, but s
2005 15:46:58 +0100
From: Frank Lichtenheld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Luk Claes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
CC: Martin Zobel-Helas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
On Fri, Mar 18, 2005 at 02:48:59PM +0100, Luk Claes wrote:
| I would like to join/have/coordinate/.../wha
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Andrew Pollock wrote:
| On Fri, Mar 04, 2005 at 10:06:15AM +0100, Luk Claes wrote:
|
|>I don't see any problems with my patch, though I started with running
|>autoupdate before executing the other commands. It builds without any
|>prob
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Andrew Pollock wrote:
| Hi,
Hi again
| I need some help from someone with more libtool fu than I to make a QA
| upload of libunicode (to fix #201922).
|
| It's using an antedeluvian version of libtool, and the instructions at
| http://people.debian.org/
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Andrew Pollock wrote:
| Hi,
Hi Andrew
| I need some help from someone with more libtool fu than I to make a QA
| upload of libunicode (to fix #201922).
|
| It's using an antedeluvian version of libtool, and the instructions at
| http://people.debian.org
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
| Luk Claes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
|
|
|>I have built the package in a clean pbuilder. It builds fine.
|
|
| So what explains the buildd failure? Can you upload it in a binary
| NMU so that at least we ca
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
| See bug http://bugs.debian.org/267927.
|
| I only just noticed the ppxp build failure, which is i386 specific.
| The -9 version was fine, but the -10 version fails. But the -10
| version only changed package descriptions
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Andreas Barth wrote:
| * Jeroen van Wolffelaar ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [040611 12:55]:
|
|>Nobody wants to comment? Nobody has an idea about how to handle this?
|>Especially the copyright problems filed in 2002 that haven't had any
|>maintainer reaction i
> I think I uploaded commons-collections but I don't see it here:
> http://incoming.debian.org/
>
> Of course (it was an NMU) I did remove the package from my disk after
> updating the Alioth's pkg-java cvs repository, so I do not have access
> to the .upload file...
>
> I need this package to be i
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Matthew Palmer wrote:
| On Wed, Jan 14, 2004 at 01:13:14AM +0100, Filippo Giunchedi wrote:
|
|>having a package upstream up-to-date is important and this is why we have
|>debian/watch files used by uupdate. Fortunately the PTS checks and
reports if a
87 matches
Mail list logo
