severity 505088 important
thanks
Lionel Elie Mamane lio...@mamane.lu writes:
Maintainer has put it to severity minor (not sure why: because it
applies only to nanosecond timestamp filesystems? because he thought
it did not apply to the version in lenny?), which I consider too
low. Not
retitle 456924 O: libgstreamer-perl -- Perl interface to the gstreamer
noowner 456924
thanks
Heya,
In my quest to get rid of tasks I don't have the motivation to actually
work on, I want to give up some of my packages. Basically, there are
three groups: Packages that are just fine and need a
Chris Lamb [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Please remove python-happydoc (2.1-6) from lenny - it is RC buggy (copyright
issues) and does not work with the version of Python in lenny.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ dak rm -Rns testing python-happydoc
Working... done.
Will remove the following packages from
Don Armstrong [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
*** proposal ***
For the purposes of determining buginess, setting a distribution tag
limits the bugginess of a package in distribtions to the intersection
of the distributions and the version-based bugginness of a package.
This means that a bug that
Sandro Tosi [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
The GSOC is slowly coming to its end, and all the sources, which we
definitely
wanted to import are imported. If you want to have a look at the layout of
the
database (which possibly will be changed), go to [1] and have a look.
Furthermore, you can see
Frank Lichtenheld [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I've reassigned the bugs to ftp.debian.org for packages that should be
removed from Debian completly. I would suggest the following removals
from testing at this point:
# #491892: RoQA; NPOASR, orphaned
remove hg-buildpackage/1.0.4.1
# #491891:
Andreas Tille [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
according to a relatively high popcon stat and the fact that my
package arb just depends from libmotif3 I tried to care a little
bit for openmotif. So I added XS-Autobuild: yes to the
debian/control header because I was not able to detect any
reason
Joerg Jaspert [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On 11399 March 1977, Sandro Tosi wrote:
*I* wouldnt want that, for the simple reason that its an overview about
your package in Debian, not Debian + any possible derivative where
people would like a link to.
Ok, but then why on the PTS I can see the
Joerg Jaspert [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On 11399 March 1977, Marc Brockschmidt wrote:
Ok, but then why on the PTS I can see the patches applied in Ubuntu? :)
Maybe because they aren't hidden in some non-free crap software?
As long as Launchpad is non-free one shouldn't think about using or
Stefano Zacchiroli [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Fri, Feb 29, 2008 at 01:07:11PM +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
However, I would prefer to share the mentoring with someone else, in
case I get too busy with other things at some point.
Is someone interested?
I'm interested in seeing this project
Jérémy Bobbio [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
* When packages look abandonend, fill a RC bug saying if you don't
close this bug in a month, will ask for removal.
= That was done already done by the QA team.
It was done a long time ago, another run wouldn't hurt. The reactions
were mostly
Jari Aalto [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
[wether to use $() or ``]
Le't call this wishlist if we need to be pedantic. I would still
call this a bug from a QA perspective. Quality is more than valid
syntax.
This is not a bug. Not even wishlist. Even discussing this issue is a
senseless waste of
Mohammed Adnène Trojette [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Even though it hasn't been orphaned for a long time, 44bsd-rdist:
* is RC-buggy,
* has only 5 users according to popcon,
* was last uploaded in 2002.
What do you think?
Please file a removal bug.
Marc
--
BOFH #420:
Feature was not
Heya,
coda and coda-doc are both orphaned, rc-buggy and have almost no popcon
users. They're also only in experimental. Though there is an ITA, there
was no progress in the last year.
So I'd propose to remove it - if it ever gets packaged properly again,
it should be no problem to send it
libqcad0 package, move static libs to libqcad0-dev (and change
+that to arch: any) and fix deps. (Closes: #321671)
+ * Fix link to homepage in Description (Closes: #282206)
+
+ -- Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat, 21 Jan 2006 18:06:09 +0100
+
qcad (2.0.4.0-1-2.1) unstable; urgency
Heya,
As a first step to a world without perl bindings for Gtk/Gnome 1.X, we
should remove libgnome-gnorba-perl. No rdepends, no users, rc-buggy
(xlibs-dev transition), no maintainer.
Marc
--
Fachbegriffe der Informatik - Einfach erklärt
63: professionelles Arbeiten
Netscape ist nicht
Martin Michlmayr [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
* Andreas Schuldei [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2005-12-06 16:27]:
These are the dates that we can have gatherings there:
- April 19-23.
Is there any interest in a QA meeting, maybe in April?
That seems to near to debconf6. What about the weekend in September?
Raphael Hertzog [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Le lundi 12 septembre 2005 à 01:06 +0200, Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt a
écrit :
Frank and I checked a bunch of very old packages and filed some bugs
about them - I just added usertags for my bugs to make tracking
easier. Bugs that propose to remove
Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
To see what I've done until now, look at this page:
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?tag=proposed-orphan,proposed-removal;[EMAIL
PROTECTED];pri0=tag:proposed-removal,proposed-orphan
Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
To see what I've done until now, look at this page:
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?tag=proposed-orphan,proposed-removal;[EMAIL
PROTECTED];pri0=tag:proposed-removal,proposed-orphan
This is more sophisticated (though the URI is ugly
Heya,
Frank and I checked a bunch of very old packages and filed some bugs
about them - I just added usertags for my bugs to make tracking
easier. Bugs that propose to remove the package and give the maintainer
some time to react are now tagged proposed-removal, bugs that ping the
maintainer and
Tobias Toedter [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Tuesday 19 July 2005 17:25, Martin Zobel-Helas wrote:
Therefore a Debian-QA-MiniConf will be organized at the Technical
University of Darmstadt[2] from the 9th to the 11th of September.
are you also planning a keysigning party during that event?
No,
Raphael Hertzog [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
The effort to upload a package is still the same: Integrating patches
into a package is something every DD should be able to do (either using
the .diff.gz directly or by leaving the patch management
Raphael Hertzog [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
But building packages from a suvbersion repository can be done
automatically. So yes, we could provide automatically unofficial
packages to the users. And furthermore it would be trivially simple for
a DD to upload a new package...
Right, because
Russ Allbery [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Frank Lichtenheld [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
3) There are about 1000 Debian developers and thousands of Debian
users out there.
4) Not one of them has offered to maintain dvidvi, not you, not the
maintainers of the packages that depend on it
I
Martin Zobel-Helas [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Could all of you who plan to participate list these weekends from
beginning of July (after Debconf) 'til end of September, where you
definitifly will NOT be able to participate, so we get an overview when
it fits for most of us.
OK, I can't
Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I'd like to announce a bug-squashing party this weekend, with a view to
having them often and regularly (perhaps every weekend) until the
release of sarge. The RC bug list is scary, and we need to mobilize
people into cutting it down a lot.
Though i like
Francesco P. Lovergine [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Thu, Jun 24, 2004 at 12:06:33PM +0200, Jeroen van Wolffelaar wrote:
On Thu, Jun 24, 2004 at 11:42:10AM +0200, Francesco P. Lovergine wrote:
On Thu, Jun 24, 2004 at 10:32:42AM +1000, Andrew Pollock wrote:
So I go to try and prepare a QA upload
Andrew Pollock [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
[xirssi build problems]
gcc-3.2: /usr/lib/perl/5.8.2/auto/DynaLoader/DynaLoader.a: No such file or
directory
Now I can see why it's failing (this version of Perl isn't what's in
unstable) but I can't see why it's deciding this version of Perl is the
29 matches
Mail list logo
