On Wed, Aug 09, 2006 at 01:25:59AM +0200, Pierre Habouzit wrote:
> Le mar 8 août 2006 20:06, Matt Zimmerman a écrit :
> > I'm happy for anyone to upload it; the person who takes over
> > upstream, though, should have solid Python skills and be prepared to
> > own it goi
On Tue, Aug 08, 2006 at 03:54:29PM +0200, Amaya wrote:
> Pierre Habouzit wrote:
> > Le mar 8 août 2006 00:00, Matt Zimmerman a écrit :
> > > On Mon, Aug 07, 2006 at 10:15:30PM +0200, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> > > > apt-listchanges (4 NMUs)
> > >
> > >
On Mon, Aug 07, 2006 at 10:15:30PM +0200, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> The last upload that the PTS can attribute to Matt was 2005-01-20, and
> the packages that he maintains are growing worse in shape. At least
> the following packages need new maintainers:
>
> apt-listchanges (4 NMUs)
Needs a n
On Mon, Jun 12, 2006 at 06:22:26AM -0400, Jose Parrella wrote:
> I don't really support this idea but: what if a branch of the archive is
> opened where this packages could be put in and Debian makes a explicit
> statement indicating that packages there are orphaned or very little
> maintained? Thi
On Mon, Dec 19, 2005 at 10:25:58AM -0500, Asheesh Laroia wrote:
> hct looks very cool and does seem to solve some of the problems that are
> considered here. When I read https://wiki.launchpad.canonical.com/HCT , I
> get the sense that it's not actually released yet. Is that the case? If
> no
On Mon, Dec 19, 2005 at 03:53:22PM +0100, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
> I disagree. Soyuz is a reimplementation of the archive software. HCT
> addresses the problem of package publishing within Soyuz. In what scope
> HCT will support 'collaborative maintenance' is AFAIK quite unclear.
HCT is a tool fo
On Tue, Jul 19, 2005 at 11:46:50AM -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
> Why are changes made by one particular derived debian distribution so
> important that they should be singled out by the PTS?
They aren't necessarily more important changes, but Ubuntu, unlike other
derivatives, publishes deltas relative
On Mon, Jul 18, 2005 at 05:44:09PM +0200, Raphaël Hertzog wrote:
> Hello,
>
> to improve integration of Ubuntu patches into Debian we need to make
> maintainers aware of their existence. So they need to be mentionned in
> the PTS.
>
> Scott, can you generate (regularly) a simple list of available
On Sat, Feb 26, 2005 at 01:10:30PM +1100, Andrew Pollock wrote:
> There's a few reasonably annoying bugs in dhcp3-client, that have been open
> for a fair while and have patches.
>
> I notice that there hasn't been an upload in over 6 months. Is there any
> chance that any of these bugs can be fi
On Sun, Aug 01, 2004 at 12:05:12PM +0200, J.H.M. Dassen (Ray) wrote:
> If cups-pdf invoked on behalf of a regular user is actually run with root
> privileges (I haven't checked), then -dSAFER only alleviates the security
> problems resulting from that situation, but it certainly doesn't end them,
On Thu, Jul 29, 2004 at 11:27:55AM +0200, Roman Medina-Heigl Hernandez wrote:
> On Thu, 22 Jul 2004 20:28:23 +0200 (CEST), you wrote:
>
> >About security fixes in the SquirrelMail code; SquirrelMail does not
> >(contrary to Roman's standpoint) adhere to a obscurity-policy but in
> >stead openly d
severity 262402 grave
thanks
On Sun, Aug 01, 2004 at 05:07:52AM +0200, Florian Zumbiehl wrote:
> I recently (well, two weeks ago, that is) reported a number of security
> problems in cups-pdf, originally filed under #259993. Please read the BTS
> entry for details on the development up to the cur
On Sun, Jul 25, 2004 at 04:26:52PM +0200, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
> > Your message dated Sun, 25 Jul 2004 15:53:49 +0200
> > with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > and subject line Upstream version is now available in developer.php
> > has caused the attached B
On Wed, Jul 21, 2004 at 01:29:04PM +0200, Johannes Poehlmann wrote:
> I am working in the development projekt for the speak-freely package.
> (speak-freely.sourceforge.net)
>
> One Year and a day ago, i filed this bug report, saying that
> o There are security related bugs in the very outdated de
On Mon, Jun 07, 2004 at 12:20:22AM +1000, Andrew Pollock wrote:
> Not sure if anyone else is going to find this of massive use, but I find I'm
> often looking at changelogs for packages that aren't necessarily installed
> locally, or I'm out and about and all I have is my email and a web browser,
On Fri, Mar 19, 2004 at 04:02:28PM +1000, Andrew Pollock wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 19, 2004 at 01:25:10AM +0100, Frank Lichtenheld wrote:
> > Hi.
> >
> > I was going through the RC bug list and compiled a little set of
> > packages that seem to deserve a NMU.
> >
> > You can find it at http://people.
On Sat, Mar 13, 2004 at 12:21:59AM +0100, P.B.van.den.Berg wrote:
> Some points arising:
> 1. The maintainer does recognize that speedtouch depends on libatm1,
> because that
> is stated in ppp's README.Debian (speedtouch needs the pppoatm.so plugin):
The ppp package already suggests libatm1, me
On Mon, Feb 09, 2004 at 07:47:10PM +0100, Francesco Paolo Lovergine wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 09, 2004 at 08:37:30AM -0800, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
> >
> > The description lies; kernel-patch-evms was updated for 2.6.0 some time ago.
> > Of course, 2.6.0 has known security problem
On Mon, Feb 09, 2004 at 09:51:26AM +0100, Francesco Paolo Lovergine wrote:
> The following patches apply to test kernels, they probably need updates for a
> current one.
>
> kernel-patch-evms - Enterprise Volume Management System (kernel patches)
The description lies; kernel-patch-evms was upda
On Fri, Jan 30, 2004 at 10:22:39PM +0100, Andreas Barth wrote:
> is usbmgr still useful (as we have hotplug)? Reason for this question
> is that usbmgr is orphaned and has one RC-grade bug, and if it is not
> useful any more, it should be rather removed than fixed.
>
> More infos on http://packag
On Sun, Oct 12, 2003 at 08:24:33PM -0400, Nathanael Nerode wrote:
> sysklogd: #199989 -- 1/500 chance of hang on diskless systems
> Sounds effectively unreproducible, should probably be closed.
I certainly have never experienced this on my diskless system, which has run
almost everything from woo
On Sun, Oct 12, 2003 at 08:24:33PM -0400, Nathanael Nerode wrote:
> zebra: #198458 -- segfault
> Maintainer: Takuo Kitame <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Presumably just busy, what with Mozilla and all.
This sounds rather serious. Someone needs to reproduce the bug under gdb or
do something else useful in
On Sun, Oct 12, 2003 at 06:59:35PM -0400, Nathanael Nerode wrote:
> modutils: #171949
> Maitnainer wants help.
I think you mean #171947. This bug should really be trivial to fix by
enforcing a sane umask. I think it deserves an NMU by now, but I can't do
it at the moment.
> postnuke: #197636 -
On Sun, Aug 10, 2003 at 04:03:16PM -0500, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
> Now the merged bugs are not counted anymore.
Thanks for the quick response. I think something is wrong, though. The
page now says that apt has no bugs at all.
--
- mdz
On Sun, Aug 10, 2003 at 11:01:47AM +0200, Martin Godisch wrote:
> Package: qa.debian.org
> Version: N/A; reported 2003-08-10
> Severity: wishlist
>
> Thank you!
>
> Kind regards,
Indeed, this would be very helpful for a quick visual scan of relative
package bugginess.
--
- mdz
On Sat, Aug 09, 2003 at 02:17:36AM +0200, Raphael Goulais wrote:
> Reading the thread about nm process on debian devel, I learned the mutt
> maintainer was willing to co-maintain mutt. I wondered how I could have found
> this information ... and did not found it.
>
> Some maintainers use the PT
On Wed, Aug 06, 2003 at 05:21:20PM +0200, Robert Lemmen wrote:
> i fixed the xtrojka bugs (trivial), set the maintainer field to qa
> and updated the policy version. i am not a dd so i would be happy if
> someone could have a look and upload it for me, files are at
> http://www.semistable.com/file
On Mon, Jun 30, 2003 at 12:32:25PM -0400, Joe Brown wrote:
> I've downloaded the libc6_2.2.5-11.5_i386.deb from the debian security
> updates server twice, and both times came up corrupted.
>
> I'm throwing a fit trying to get debian installed, but that's due to a
> dual headed video card and X
On Wed, Jun 18, 2003 at 12:34:59AM +0200, Christian Marillat wrote:
> Yann Dirson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > On Tue, Jun 17, 2003 at 11:56:40PM +0200, Christian Marillat wrote:
> >> I've already saying 4 times that this bug is a configuration issue. Your
> >> attitude is also unacceptable,
On Tue, Jun 10, 2003 at 01:16:52AM +1000, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> We've all heard that the bug count in Debian is rising... some may
> have argued that this is because we have an increasing number of
> packages in the archive. I just looked at the data from over 2 years
> of packages in the bas
On Tue, May 20, 2003 at 12:34:29PM +0200, Bill Allombert wrote:
> Bug 15277 against xaw3dg,xlib6g,xaw95
> potato/default xaw library
>
> is tagged potato and is probably obsolete.
It would be a decidedly good idea to send this information to the bug
itself, so that it is recorded for anyone exam
On Fri, Apr 25, 2003 at 02:23:29PM +0200, Arnaud Vandyck wrote:
> ___
> / Bas Zoetekouw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> | AFAIK, there is no automatic way of doing this. What about adding a
> | new tag, something like CBP (cannot be packaged),
On Tue, May 14, 2002 at 10:42:47PM -0300, Ben Armstrong wrote:
> On Tue, May 14, 2002 at 09:12:34PM -0400, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
> > I'll see about setting up rrdexplorer or a similar tool to allow the
> > RRDs to be interactively browsed, and see what else can be done. I ca
On Tue, May 14, 2002 at 06:05:43PM -0300, Ben Armstrong wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 18, 2002 at 10:39:28PM -0400, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
> > > Ben Armstrong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > Is there any tool to visualize the bug history over the release cycle
> >
On Fri, Apr 19, 2002 at 08:48:12AM +0900, Oohara Yuuma wrote:
> On Thu, 18 Apr 2002 09:51:41 -0300,
> Ben Armstrong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Is there any tool to visualize the bug history over the release cycle of an
> > individual package? I'm thinking that would be an interesting way to se
On Mon, Feb 18, 2002 at 12:56:07PM +0100, Francesco P. Lovergine wrote:
> clisp | 1999-07-22-4 | testing | m68k
> clisp | 1999-07-22-4 | unstable | m68k
> clisp | 1999-07-22-5 |stable | source, alpha, i386, powerpc
> clisp | 1999-07-22-5 | testing | pow
On Tue, Jan 15, 2002 at 01:55:32PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 14, 2002 at 10:35:11PM +0100, Bas Zoetekouw wrote:
> > I intend to rename all ITP's that haven't had any activity in the last
> > 100 days to RFP's. Any objections?
>
> No objections, a couple of suggestions that you're
On Tue, Jan 08, 2002 at 11:43:54PM +0100, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> The main problem is that it's very much work if every six months a person
> comes and tries to go through the WNPP bugs. That's something I hope it
> will become with my proposal of testing tasks - there are people
> responsible for WN
Package: coolicon
Severity: minor
This is an automated bug report.
I have recently conducted a mass spelling check of Debian package
descriptions. In the process, some other errors were also detected,
such as capitalization, word wrap, and indentation problems.
Some notable guidelines that I us
On Fri, Dec 14, 2001 at 03:54:59PM +0100, Philipp Haeuser wrote:
> Is ssh2 2.0.13-6 (the debian/unstable package from packages.debian.org)
> vulnerable to the crc32 compensation attack described here ?
>
> http://razor.bindview.com/publish/advisories/adv_ssh1crc.html
This issue only applies to s
On Fri, Dec 07, 2001 at 11:20:52AM -0800, Grant Bowman wrote:
> Christian Kurz and I came up with some other factors that are measurable
> and may need to be taken into account to increase the validity of the
> data. Just the average open unarchived bugs isn't very accurate though
> I feel it's a
On Wed, Oct 17, 2001 at 09:37:32PM +0100, Andrew Suffield wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 17, 2001 at 05:44:32AM -0500, Colin Watson wrote:
> >[RC ssh2 bugs]
>
> And a few more. It's buggy, and real ssh does the job; I'm not aware
> of any compelling justification for it's continued existance. I
> suggest i
Package: grunch
Version: 1.3-2
Severity: wishlist
Since the programs in question are shell scripts, they should use
tempfile(1) from debianutils for creating its temporary files.
Since this package is orphaned, if I get the itch, I'll do an NMU to make
this change.
-- System Information
Debian R
On Sat, Jul 21, 2001 at 04:29:41AM +0200, David Spreen wrote:
> well, perhaps herbert xu will listen to you, he doesn't listen to me. My
> problem is the following, I do not know why it is necessary to modify the
> kernelsource from upstream so much, that patches etc. do not apply to it. In
> my
On Wed, Apr 25, 2001 at 03:53:15PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
> + photopc uploaded 232 days ago, out of date by 222 days!
> hasn't built on sparc; there doesn't appear to be
> a bug filed
It built fine on vore once I copied in debstd. Uploading now.
--
- mdz
I confess to knowing almost nothing about writing Perl XS modules, but the
typemap file here really shouldn't be using anything with a double underscore
in front of it. Also, isn't this all unnecessary because the XS language
already provide a way to get at a variable number of arguments? The
doc
Here is a patch to eliminate this warning:
--- libnewt-perl-1.08/Newt.pm Tue Mar 20 05:47:39 2001
+++ libnewt-perl-1.08+mdz/Newt.pm Tue Mar 20 05:47:29 2001
@@ -523,7 +523,7 @@
sub Newt::Form::DESTROY {
my $self = shift;
- Newt::newtFormDestroy($self->{co});
+ Newt::newtFormDestr
47 matches
Mail list logo
