Re: Bug#903155: #903155 tracker.debian.org is incredibly slow with certain cert9.db

2018-07-14 Thread Mike Hommey
On Sun, Jul 15, 2018 at 12:21:51PM +1000, Dmitry Smirnov wrote: > On Sunday, 15 July 2018 7:24:15 AM AEST Mike Hommey wrote: > > sqlite doesn't work well on NFS. That's a long standing known issue. See > > e.g. https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1432484 (commen

Re: Bug#903155: #903155 tracker.debian.org is incredibly slow with certain cert9.db

2018-07-14 Thread Mike Hommey
ith new > Firefox profile: when copied into profile folder, opening [1] is > significantly slower, it takes _minutes_ if profile is on network file system > but opens reasonably fast if "cert9.db" is moved to tmpfs and symlinked back > to profile folder. > > Once again, strangest thing is how much "tracker.debian.org" is affected > comparing to pretty much any other site. That's because tracker.debian.org, for some reason, asks for a client-side SSL certificate. Mike

Re: Dead link at bottom of GOsa Debian Packages page

2018-07-07 Thread Mike Gabriel
; Please correct this. > > Thanks! > -Theral Mackey Oh well, this is a good catch and probably affects all packages that were recently migrated to salsa. @QA team: wouldn't it make sense to show the Vcs-*: fields from the packages' unstable versions on package pages in st

Bug#886450: tracker.debian.org: Separate subscription for official and non-official architectures builds

2018-01-05 Thread Mike Hommey
Which would be kind of okay if those were builds for official architectures supported by debian, but they aren't. So I would very much be interested by a separation between build for official architectures and build for unofficial architectures. Mike PS: In case you're interested: se

Bug#758194: DDPO not updating for wheezy-bpo packages

2014-08-15 Thread Mike Gabriel
team DDPO page [2] seems to be getting updated with those uploads to wheezy-bpo. Can someone please check? Mike [1] https://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=sunweaver%40debian.org [2] https://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=pkg-owncloud-maintain...@lists.alioth.debian.org --

Re: My recent bpo-uploads not appearing in my qa page

2013-10-25 Thread Mike Gabriel
On Fr 25 Okt 2013 12:30:46 CEST, Nicolas Dandrimont wrote: Control: tags 710487 + patch [Trimming down the Cc: list a bit] * Mike Gabriel [2013-10-25 09:39:41 +]: I really wished someone with sufficient privileges could look at this rather sooner than later. I start loosing track

Re: My recent bpo-uploads not appearing in my qa page

2013-10-25 Thread Mike Gabriel
similar about this. Mike -- DAS-NETZWERKTEAM mike gabriel, herweg 7, 24357 fleckeby fon: +49 (1520) 1976 148 GnuPG Key ID 0x25771B31 mail: mike.gabr...@das-netzwerkteam.de, http://das-netzwerkteam.de freeBusy: https://mail.das-netzwerkteam.de/freebusy/m.gabriel%40das-netzwerkteam.de.xfb

Re: My recent bpo-uploads not appearing in my qa page

2013-10-21 Thread Mike Gabriel
. Is that a known issue? Is anyone working on that already? I suppose it is related to bug #710487. Best wishes, Boris ohhh.. that bug is rather old... Any idea how this can be fixed? And by whom? Anything I can do? Mike -- DAS-NETZWERKTEAM mike gabriel, herweg 7, 24357 fleckeby fon: +49 (1520

Bug#694039: qa.debian.org: Use a different color for outdated backports

2012-11-23 Thread Mike Hommey
On Fri, Nov 23, 2012 at 09:50:30AM +, Bart Martens wrote: > On Fri, Nov 23, 2012 at 08:54:16AM +0100, Mike Hommey wrote: > > When the backports version is outdated compared to the version in > > testing, it would be useful that ddpo displays it in a different color. > >

Bug#694039: qa.debian.org: Use a different color for outdated backports

2012-11-22 Thread Mike Hommey
Package: qa.debian.org Severity: wishlist When the backports version is outdated compared to the version in testing, it would be useful that ddpo displays it in a different color. -- System Information: Debian Release: wheezy/sid APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'exper

[PATCH] Fix email autocompletion callback ids

2012-09-02 Thread Mike Miller
--- web/dmd.cgi |6 +++--- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/web/dmd.cgi b/web/dmd.cgi index 9bbb484..94ea64a 100755 --- a/web/dmd.cgi +++ b/web/dmd.cgi @@ -41,21 +41,21 @@ $(function() { $( "#email1" ).autocomplete({ source: "dmd-emails.cgi", select: f

Bug#663215: qa.debian.org: Please link to the {stable, old}-bpo packages.d.o page from the PTS page

2012-03-09 Thread Mike Dornberger
sing. As it seems, <http://packages.debian.org/source/oldstable-backports/git> and <http://packages.debian.org/source/stable-backports/git> are alternative locations. Greetings, Mike Dornberger -- System Information: Debian Release: 5.0.9 APT prefers oldstable APT policy: (500, &

Bug#321715: closed by Giovanni Mascellani (Closing)

2011-08-16 Thread Mike Hommey
log show the bug anymore, so I > assume it is fixed (after 6 years!). I've never seen it myself. It's fixed if you consider the complete removal of the "packages by gpg key" feature to be a fix. I don't care anymore anyways. Mike -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa

Bug#565219: closed by Mike Hommey (Re: Bug#565219: qa.debian.org: bug history graphs are incorrect)

2011-02-18 Thread Mike Hommey
On Fri, Feb 18, 2011 at 07:14:01PM +0100, Mike Hommey wrote: > On Fri, Feb 18, 2011 at 06:53:50PM +0100, Francesco Poli wrote: > > On Fri, 18 Feb 2011 17:19:35 +0100 Mike Hommey wrote: > > > > > On Sat, Oct 30, 2010 at 06:57:17PM +0200, Francesco Poli wrote: > > >

Bug#565219: closed by Mike Hommey (Re: Bug#565219: qa.debian.org: bug history graphs are incorrect)

2011-02-18 Thread Mike Hommey
On Fri, Feb 18, 2011 at 06:53:50PM +0100, Francesco Poli wrote: > On Fri, 18 Feb 2011 17:19:35 +0100 Mike Hommey wrote: > > > On Sat, Oct 30, 2010 at 06:57:17PM +0200, Francesco Poli wrote: > > > In summary, I think that test-1 could be considered OK, unless we > >

Bug#565219: qa.debian.org: bug history graphs are incorrect

2010-10-30 Thread Mike Hommey
On Sat, Oct 30, 2010 at 12:10:43AM +0200, Francesco Poli wrote: > On Thu, 28 Oct 2010 16:49:00 +0200 Mike Hommey wrote: > > > On Sun, Jul 18, 2010 at 03:44:33PM +0200, Francesco Poli wrote: > > > Anyway: the documentation seems to state that the option > >

Bug#565219: qa.debian.org: bug history graphs are incorrect

2010-10-28 Thread Mike Hommey
of the above on the new graphs on http://qa.debian.org/data/bts/graphs Note this isn't final, and not incorporated within debian-qa yet. Mike -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20101028144900.ga15...@glandium.org

Bug#565219: qa.debian.org: bug history graphs are incorrect

2010-10-10 Thread Mike Hommey
On Wed, Oct 06, 2010 at 11:38:47PM +0200, Christoph Berg wrote: > Re: Mike Hommey 2010-10-04 <20101004083753.ga6...@glandium.org> > > PS: quantz does't have UserDir enabled, so for the moment the graphs are > > just sitting in my home. They will obviously move, ev

Bug#565219: qa.debian.org: bug history graphs are incorrect

2010-10-04 Thread Mike Hommey
On Sun, Oct 03, 2010 at 09:04:48AM +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote: > On Sun, 03 Oct 2010, Mike Hommey wrote: > > I guess we should move to this machine soon... What would you need from > > me? > > The qa machine is now quantz. I suggest you integrate your scripts and

Bug#565219: qa.debian.org: bug history graphs are incorrect

2010-10-04 Thread Mike Hommey
On Mon, Oct 04, 2010 at 11:13:31AM +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote: > On Mon, 04 Oct 2010, Mike Hommey wrote: > > For the record, I rsync'ed the data from merkel to my home on quantz, > > from where I started to run the cronjobs. This means merkel can go off > > and we sho

Bug#565219: qa.debian.org: bug history graphs are incorrect

2010-10-02 Thread Mike Hommey
On Tue, Sep 07, 2010 at 09:28:39AM +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote: > On Mon, 06 Sep 2010, Mike Hommey wrote: > > On Mon, Sep 06, 2010 at 09:15:58PM +0200, Mike Hommey wrote: > > > On Mon, Sep 06, 2010 at 09:03:25PM +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote: > > > > On Mon,

Bug#565219: qa.debian.org: bug history graphs are incorrect

2010-09-06 Thread Mike Hommey
On Mon, Sep 06, 2010 at 09:15:58PM +0200, Mike Hommey wrote: > On Mon, Sep 06, 2010 at 09:03:25PM +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote: > > On Mon, 06 Sep 2010, Mike Hommey wrote: > > > That being said, now that merkel is going to be shut down, maybe it's > > > time to do t

Bug#565219: qa.debian.org: bug history graphs are incorrect

2010-09-06 Thread Mike Hommey
On Mon, Sep 06, 2010 at 09:03:25PM +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote: > On Mon, 06 Sep 2010, Mike Hommey wrote: > > That being said, now that merkel is going to be shut down, maybe it's > > time to do things right and properly migrate and integrate with qa.d.o. > > > &

Bug#565219: qa.debian.org: bug history graphs are incorrect

2010-09-06 Thread Mike Hommey
ly migrate and integrate with qa.d.o. QA people, what do you think? Mike -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20100906145451.ga8...@glandium.org

Bug#565219: qa.debian.org: bug history graphs are incorrect

2010-07-18 Thread Mike Hommey
On Sat, Jul 17, 2010 at 08:00:42PM +0200, Francesco Poli wrote: > On Fri, 12 Feb 2010 20:42:35 +0100 Mike Hommey wrote: > > > On Fri, Feb 12, 2010 at 08:27:53PM +0100, Francesco Poli wrote: > > > On Fri, 12 Feb 2010 19:53:48 +0100 Mike Hommey wrote: > [...] > > &

Mike Genkin invites you to use Boxbe

2010-07-06 Thread Mike Genkin
I'd like to share approved contacts with you on Boxbe Here's the link: https://www.boxbe.com/register?tc=3568602782_854525965 -Mike This message was sent at the request of genkstar...@yahoo.com. If you want to opt-out of invitations from Boxbe members, use this link: https://www

Bug#565219: qa.debian.org: bug history graphs are incorrect

2010-02-12 Thread Mike Hommey
On Fri, Feb 12, 2010 at 08:27:53PM +0100, Francesco Poli wrote: > On Fri, 12 Feb 2010 19:53:48 +0100 Mike Hommey wrote: > > > On Fri, Feb 12, 2010 at 07:47:12PM +0100, Francesco Poli wrote: > [...] > > > Is it feasible to fix the RRD configuration? > > > >

Bug#565219: qa.debian.org: bug history graphs are incorrect

2010-02-12 Thread Mike Hommey
On Fri, Feb 12, 2010 at 07:47:12PM +0100, Francesco Poli wrote: > On Fri, 12 Feb 2010 19:19:27 +0100 Mike Hommey wrote: > > > On Fri, Feb 12, 2010 at 07:16:37PM +0100, Francesco Poli wrote: > [...] > > > I am reopening this bug report, since it seems to me that the

Bug#565219: qa.debian.org: bug history graphs are incorrect

2010-02-12 Thread Mike Hommey
hing I failed to understand? As I said earlier, the RRD files are not properly configured, and aggregation doesn't allow for quick updates of the bug numbers. Mike -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#565219: qa.debian.org: bug history graphs are incorrect

2010-01-18 Thread Mike Hommey
On Mon, Jan 18, 2010 at 09:54:53PM +1300, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: > On 18/01/10 at 09:40 +0100, Mike Hommey wrote: > > On Mon, Jan 18, 2010 at 09:33:24PM +1300, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: > > > On 17/01/10 at 10:26 +0100, Mike Hommey wrote: > > > > The correct data is now

Bug#565219: qa.debian.org: bug history graphs are incorrect

2010-01-18 Thread Mike Hommey
On Mon, Jan 18, 2010 at 09:33:24PM +1300, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: > On 17/01/10 at 10:26 +0100, Mike Hommey wrote: > > The correct data is now gathered, but it doesn't solve *your* issue, > > which is due to something else, actually: the ddpo data doesn't contain > >

Bug#565219: qa.debian.org: bug history graphs are incorrect

2010-01-17 Thread Mike Hommey
On Thu, Jan 14, 2010 at 06:45:13PM +0100, Francesco Poli wrote: > On Thu, 14 Jan 2010 09:06:56 +0100 Mike Hommey wrote: > > First of all, thanks to you all for your kind replies. > > [...] > > I've been considering running a script on merkel to get the proper data &

Bug#565219: qa.debian.org: bug history graphs are incorrect

2010-01-14 Thread Mike Hommey
On Thu, Jan 14, 2010 at 09:06:56AM +0100, Mike Hommey wrote: > I've discussed this with both zack and don @debconf and the outcome is > that it would be better if it were integrated within the BTS. > > Now, as for the current graphs, I'm sorry to say that they just suck

Bug#548009: qa.debian.org isn't updated for a while

2010-01-14 Thread Mike Hommey
x27;ll let Myon or someone else > do it for the DDPO. And here is a patch to achieve this. (in data/cronjobs) This would finally make ddpo stop giving bad information (which is important, because there are RC bugs listed that are not... see my ddpo page for ice

Bug#565219: qa.debian.org: bug history graphs are incorrect

2010-01-14 Thread Mike Hommey
> > but at that time, all bugs were already resolved. > > > > > > I don't know whether this problem is related to (or even the same as) > > bugs #546676, #548009, and #526237. > > > > Anyway, please fix the generation of the graphs: they are ni

Bug#561655: qa.debian.org: Popcon statistics for a given source package should include old binary packages

2009-12-19 Thread Mike Hommey
Package: qa.debian.org Severity: wishlist For example, take a look at the popcon page for the xulrunner source package: http://qa.debian.org/popcon.php?package=xulrunner It includes information about the most recent binary packages, from unstable, but doesn't track the packages from stable, which

Should openvrml be removed ?

2009-10-10 Thread Mike Hommey
oad in the last 15 months, despite upstream having done several releases. It is also not in testing, and was not shipped in lenny, apparently. This looks like a good candidate for removal. Cheers, Mike -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubs

Re: Bug#520662: O: iceape -- The Iceape Internet Suite

2009-08-20 Thread Mike Hommey
On Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 03:13:38PM +0200, Ana Guerrero wrote: > > Hi Mike and all, > > On Sat, Mar 21, 2009 at 06:45:01PM +0100, Mike Hommey wrote: > > Package: wnpp > > Severity: normal > > > > See the great thread about "Sponsorship requirements an

Re: the new style "mass tirage" of bugs

2008-02-24 Thread Mike Hommey
est to take the maintenance of the > graph generation within the QA team. Anyone should be free to work with > Mike Hommey and do that. Maybe Mike can say a word on this topic, I > haven't checked but I expect the code to be easy to find on its accont on > gluck. The main script is

Re: QA needed for insecure LD_LIBRARY_PATH in many wrapper scripts

2007-11-16 Thread Mike Hommey
ing" or "something:" as $LD_LIBRARY_PATH ? Are there applications relying on LD_LIBRARY_PATH taking empty parts and acting as if they were '.' ? Wouldn't it be just better to change the dynamic loader so that it ignores empty parts of the LD_LIBRARY_PATH ? That would

Re: RFC: use readable $(cmd) syntax instead of unreadable `cmd`

2007-02-10 Thread Mike Hommey
On Sat, Feb 10, 2007 at 10:59:09AM +0200, Jari Aalto <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Le't call this "wishlist" if we need to be pedantic. I would still > call this a bug from a QA perspective. Quality is more than "valid > syntax". `` vs $(), QA ? OMFFSM Mi

Re: Proposal for collaborative maintenance of packages

2005-12-19 Thread Mike Hommey
o. People do feel > locked out. If the central approach of svn is scary to you, just use svk. It is compatible with svn and is decentralized. Mike -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#89903: Apsfilterconfig -->execstackoverflow (fresh Deb2.2r2 install)

2001-03-16 Thread Mike Neman
eautifully without any intervention from me. In the case of SuSE: it setup the printer the first time I installed the OS and I never looked back. Hope it's not me ;-) Keep up the GREAT work! Greets, Mike _ Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com.

inquiery

2000-03-04 Thread mike wahle
nteer for such a project. Thanks for your time and input. Mike Wahle

bugfix/enhancement for memtest-1.0.1

1999-12-09 Thread Mike Coleman
Here's a patch for memtest that fixes an uninitialized variable bug. It also should now work on 64-bit machines, though I don't have one to try it on. Other minor changes include compile flags, printing pointers in hex, and getting rid of a couple compiler warnings. --Mike diff -Na

Bug#47709: Some scripts way, way out of date

1999-10-25 Thread Mike Bilow
l system on the machine, you can point at something else. I think that there would be little sympathy in the Debian community for treating as a bug the failure of an alternative "mail-transport-agent" to support the precise command line syntax of Sendmail. In such cases, the problem would really only be resolvable by the upstream author, and there is little to be gained by forwarding something like this upstream. Especially where, as in your example, the "-o" switches are involved, the command line syntax of Sendmail is something of a moving target. Whether the "cgi-scripts" package should suggest "mail-transport-agent" seems potentially controversial to me. As we agreed, there are security risks associated with running mail on the same system as a web server. It is very common to do it, but I am not sure that Debain should "suggest" it as an example of good practice. Rather, it is more in the nature of an economic compromise. -- Mike

Bug#47709: Some scripts way, way out of date

1999-10-24 Thread Mike Bilow
e here, but using Net::SMTP has several major advantages over > > directly invoking Sendmail, and can fully preserve queue processing > > when used appropriately. Your points are well-taken and I would > > not recommend Net::SMTP if it did require the sacrifice of queue > > processing. > > Ok :) I think we are in broad philosophical agreement about what is and is not functionally desirable for a CGI script to do. My issue is that we are discussing this in the context of an example program in the Debian "cgi-scripts" package, and we have to try to make this work on the broadest possible range of systems without incurring package dependency penalties unless they are absolutely necessary. In particuar, if it is not absolutely essential that an example CGI script invoke Sendmail, which means that the "cgi-scripts" package is then in some way depenent upon the "sendmail" package, this should be avoided. -- Mike

Bug#47709: Some scripts way, way out of date

1999-10-24 Thread Mike Bilow
reserve queue processing when used appropriately. Your points are well-taken and I would not recommend Net::SMTP if it did require the sacrifice of queue processing. -- Mike

Bug#26611: macunpack reports unknown compression method

1999-10-20 Thread Mike Bilow
Package: macutils Version: 2.0b3-6 Severity: wishlist Any hope of getting someone to update macunpack? -- Mike 16:07:08 colossus:~$ file ARA-991020.bulk ARA-991020.bulk: StuffIt Archive (data) : T! 16:07:14 colossus:~$ macunpack ARA-991020.bulk Unknown compression methods: d 0

Bug#47708: 'mailto.pl' passes unquoted addres to 'sendmail'

1999-10-18 Thread Mike Bilow
Another related issue worth noting is that the 'mailto.pl' script invokes 'sendmail' with the address provided unquoted on the command line. I am sure there are more of these; it is just a matter of wading through them. -- Mike

Bug#47709: Some scripts way, way out of date

1999-10-18 Thread Mike Bilow
of the package represents. On the whole, as examples of how to write CGI programs, it is my opinion that the package in its current state probably does more harm than good. If no one is going to do a wholesale revision, the package should dropped. -- Mike

Bug#47708: Serious security holes result from failure to quote variables

1999-10-18 Thread Mike Bilow
such as the 'nph-test-cgi' problem, some remain, such as the 'calendar' problem. Regardless, the security problems here in combination with low probability of consequent bug propagation in this situation warrant a correction to the stable tree in addition to the unstable tree. -- Mike