Re: Bug#903155: #903155 tracker.debian.org is incredibly slow with certain cert9.db

2018-07-14 Thread Mike Hommey
On Sun, Jul 15, 2018 at 12:21:51PM +1000, Dmitry Smirnov wrote: > On Sunday, 15 July 2018 7:24:15 AM AEST Mike Hommey wrote: > > sqlite doesn't work well on NFS. That's a long standing known issue. See > > e.g. https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1432484 (commen

Re: Bug#903155: #903155 tracker.debian.org is incredibly slow with certain cert9.db

2018-07-14 Thread Mike Hommey
On Sun, Jul 15, 2018 at 02:57:23AM +1000, Dmitry Smirnov wrote: > Finally I've managed to isolate the problem. > Removing "cert9.db" from profile folder relieves symptoms entirely. > > I could not reproduce the problem on new profile created on Firefox 61 > however I could easily reproduce on few

Bug#886450: tracker.debian.org: Separate subscription for official and non-official architectures builds

2018-01-05 Thread Mike Hommey
Package: tracker.debian.org Severity: wishlist I like to subscribe to the `build` keyword for some of my packages, essentially to get notifications of build failures. The sad result is that because some buildds are dumb, I'm being spammed by them trying and failing to build over and over. Which wo

Bug#694039: qa.debian.org: Use a different color for outdated backports

2012-11-23 Thread Mike Hommey
On Fri, Nov 23, 2012 at 09:50:30AM +, Bart Martens wrote: > On Fri, Nov 23, 2012 at 08:54:16AM +0100, Mike Hommey wrote: > > When the backports version is outdated compared to the version in > > testing, it would be useful that ddpo displays it in a different color. > >

Bug#694039: qa.debian.org: Use a different color for outdated backports

2012-11-22 Thread Mike Hommey
Package: qa.debian.org Severity: wishlist When the backports version is outdated compared to the version in testing, it would be useful that ddpo displays it in a different color. -- System Information: Debian Release: wheezy/sid APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'exper

Bug#321715: closed by Giovanni Mascellani (Closing)

2011-08-16 Thread Mike Hommey
On Tue, Aug 16, 2011 at 06:51:11PM +, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote: > This is an automatic notification regarding your Bug report > which was filed against the qa.debian.org package: > > #307461: www.debian.org: qa.debian.org's Developer's Package overview doesn't > work by gpg key any mo

Bug#565219: closed by Mike Hommey (Re: Bug#565219: qa.debian.org: bug history graphs are incorrect)

2011-02-18 Thread Mike Hommey
On Fri, Feb 18, 2011 at 07:14:01PM +0100, Mike Hommey wrote: > On Fri, Feb 18, 2011 at 06:53:50PM +0100, Francesco Poli wrote: > > On Fri, 18 Feb 2011 17:19:35 +0100 Mike Hommey wrote: > > > > > On Sat, Oct 30, 2010 at 06:57:17PM +0200, Francesco Poli wrote: > > >

Bug#565219: closed by Mike Hommey (Re: Bug#565219: qa.debian.org: bug history graphs are incorrect)

2011-02-18 Thread Mike Hommey
On Fri, Feb 18, 2011 at 06:53:50PM +0100, Francesco Poli wrote: > On Fri, 18 Feb 2011 17:19:35 +0100 Mike Hommey wrote: > > > On Sat, Oct 30, 2010 at 06:57:17PM +0200, Francesco Poli wrote: > > > In summary, I think that test-1 could be considered OK, unless we > >

Bug#565219: qa.debian.org: bug history graphs are incorrect

2010-10-30 Thread Mike Hommey
On Sat, Oct 30, 2010 at 12:10:43AM +0200, Francesco Poli wrote: > On Thu, 28 Oct 2010 16:49:00 +0200 Mike Hommey wrote: > > > On Sun, Jul 18, 2010 at 03:44:33PM +0200, Francesco Poli wrote: > > > Anyway: the documentation seems to state that the option > >

Bug#565219: qa.debian.org: bug history graphs are incorrect

2010-10-28 Thread Mike Hommey
On Sun, Jul 18, 2010 at 03:44:33PM +0200, Francesco Poli wrote: > Anyway: the documentation seems to state that the option > > --grid-dash 1:0 > > will give solid grid lines. > > As far as the other issue is concerned (number of horizontal grid > lines) are you currently using the following op

Bug#565219: qa.debian.org: bug history graphs are incorrect

2010-10-10 Thread Mike Hommey
On Wed, Oct 06, 2010 at 11:38:47PM +0200, Christoph Berg wrote: > Re: Mike Hommey 2010-10-04 <20101004083753.ga6...@glandium.org> > > PS: quantz does't have UserDir enabled, so for the moment the graphs are > > just sitting in my home. They will obviously move, ev

Bug#565219: qa.debian.org: bug history graphs are incorrect

2010-10-04 Thread Mike Hommey
On Sun, Oct 03, 2010 at 09:04:48AM +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote: > On Sun, 03 Oct 2010, Mike Hommey wrote: > > I guess we should move to this machine soon... What would you need from > > me? > > The qa machine is now quantz. I suggest you integrate your scripts and

Bug#565219: qa.debian.org: bug history graphs are incorrect

2010-10-04 Thread Mike Hommey
On Mon, Oct 04, 2010 at 11:13:31AM +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote: > On Mon, 04 Oct 2010, Mike Hommey wrote: > > For the record, I rsync'ed the data from merkel to my home on quantz, > > from where I started to run the cronjobs. This means merkel can go off > > and we sho

Bug#565219: qa.debian.org: bug history graphs are incorrect

2010-10-02 Thread Mike Hommey
On Tue, Sep 07, 2010 at 09:28:39AM +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote: > On Mon, 06 Sep 2010, Mike Hommey wrote: > > On Mon, Sep 06, 2010 at 09:15:58PM +0200, Mike Hommey wrote: > > > On Mon, Sep 06, 2010 at 09:03:25PM +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote: > > > > On Mon,

Bug#565219: qa.debian.org: bug history graphs are incorrect

2010-09-06 Thread Mike Hommey
On Mon, Sep 06, 2010 at 09:15:58PM +0200, Mike Hommey wrote: > On Mon, Sep 06, 2010 at 09:03:25PM +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote: > > On Mon, 06 Sep 2010, Mike Hommey wrote: > > > That being said, now that merkel is going to be shut down, maybe it's > > > time to do t

Bug#565219: qa.debian.org: bug history graphs are incorrect

2010-09-06 Thread Mike Hommey
On Mon, Sep 06, 2010 at 09:03:25PM +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote: > On Mon, 06 Sep 2010, Mike Hommey wrote: > > That being said, now that merkel is going to be shut down, maybe it's > > time to do things right and properly migrate and integrate with qa.d.o. > > > &

Bug#565219: qa.debian.org: bug history graphs are incorrect

2010-09-06 Thread Mike Hommey
Hi, Sorry for the delay. On Sun, Jul 18, 2010 at 04:15:19PM +0200, Francesco Poli wrote: > On Sun, 18 Jul 2010 15:44:33 +0200 Francesco Poli wrote: > > [...] > > I hope what I said does not sound too naive... :p > > Another option that may be nice to use is > > --right-axis 1:0 > > This sh

Bug#565219: qa.debian.org: bug history graphs are incorrect

2010-07-18 Thread Mike Hommey
On Sat, Jul 17, 2010 at 08:00:42PM +0200, Francesco Poli wrote: > On Fri, 12 Feb 2010 20:42:35 +0100 Mike Hommey wrote: > > > On Fri, Feb 12, 2010 at 08:27:53PM +0100, Francesco Poli wrote: > > > On Fri, 12 Feb 2010 19:53:48 +0100 Mike Hommey wrote: > [...] > > &

Bug#565219: qa.debian.org: bug history graphs are incorrect

2010-02-12 Thread Mike Hommey
On Fri, Feb 12, 2010 at 08:27:53PM +0100, Francesco Poli wrote: > On Fri, 12 Feb 2010 19:53:48 +0100 Mike Hommey wrote: > > > On Fri, Feb 12, 2010 at 07:47:12PM +0100, Francesco Poli wrote: > [...] > > > Is it feasible to fix the RRD configuration? > > > >

Bug#565219: qa.debian.org: bug history graphs are incorrect

2010-02-12 Thread Mike Hommey
On Fri, Feb 12, 2010 at 07:47:12PM +0100, Francesco Poli wrote: > On Fri, 12 Feb 2010 19:19:27 +0100 Mike Hommey wrote: > > > On Fri, Feb 12, 2010 at 07:16:37PM +0100, Francesco Poli wrote: > [...] > > > I am reopening this bug report, since it seems to me that the

Bug#565219: qa.debian.org: bug history graphs are incorrect

2010-02-12 Thread Mike Hommey
On Fri, Feb 12, 2010 at 07:16:37PM +0100, Francesco Poli wrote: > reopen 565219 ! > retitle 565219 qa.debian.org: bug history graphs are updated with excessive > delay > thanks > > > On Wed, 20 Jan 2010 09:23:55 +0100 Raphael Hertzog wrote: > > > On Wed, 20 Jan 2010, Francesco Poli wrote: > > >

Bug#565219: qa.debian.org: bug history graphs are incorrect

2010-01-18 Thread Mike Hommey
On Mon, Jan 18, 2010 at 09:54:53PM +1300, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: > On 18/01/10 at 09:40 +0100, Mike Hommey wrote: > > On Mon, Jan 18, 2010 at 09:33:24PM +1300, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: > > > On 17/01/10 at 10:26 +0100, Mike Hommey wrote: > > > > The correct data is now

Bug#565219: qa.debian.org: bug history graphs are incorrect

2010-01-18 Thread Mike Hommey
On Mon, Jan 18, 2010 at 09:33:24PM +1300, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: > On 17/01/10 at 10:26 +0100, Mike Hommey wrote: > > The correct data is now gathered, but it doesn't solve *your* issue, > > which is due to something else, actually: the ddpo data doesn't contain > >

Bug#565219: qa.debian.org: bug history graphs are incorrect

2010-01-17 Thread Mike Hommey
On Thu, Jan 14, 2010 at 06:45:13PM +0100, Francesco Poli wrote: > On Thu, 14 Jan 2010 09:06:56 +0100 Mike Hommey wrote: > > First of all, thanks to you all for your kind replies. > > [...] > > I've been considering running a script on merkel to get the proper data &

Bug#565219: qa.debian.org: bug history graphs are incorrect

2010-01-14 Thread Mike Hommey
On Thu, Jan 14, 2010 at 09:06:56AM +0100, Mike Hommey wrote: > I've discussed this with both zack and don @debconf and the outcome is > that it would be better if it were integrated within the BTS. > > Now, as for the current graphs, I'm sorry to say that they just suck

Bug#548009: qa.debian.org isn't updated for a while

2010-01-14 Thread Mike Hommey
On Wed, Sep 23, 2009 at 09:49:54PM +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote: > On Wed, 23 Sep 2009, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: > > I wrote a cgi that outputs the bugs data in the DDPO format. > > http://udd.debian.org/cgi-bin/ddpo-bugs.cgi > > I changed the PTS to directly grab that URL. I'll let Myon or someone e

Bug#565219: qa.debian.org: bug history graphs are incorrect

2010-01-14 Thread Mike Hommey
> > but at that time, all bugs were already resolved. > > > > > > I don't know whether this problem is related to (or even the same as) > > bugs #546676, #548009, and #526237. > > > > Anyway, please fix the generation of the graphs: they are ni

Bug#561655: qa.debian.org: Popcon statistics for a given source package should include old binary packages

2009-12-19 Thread Mike Hommey
Package: qa.debian.org Severity: wishlist For example, take a look at the popcon page for the xulrunner source package: http://qa.debian.org/popcon.php?package=xulrunner It includes information about the most recent binary packages, from unstable, but doesn't track the packages from stable, which

Should openvrml be removed ?

2009-10-10 Thread Mike Hommey
Hi, openvrml has 3 RC bugs, 2 of which are due to build-deps that disappeared since last time the package was uploaded. With the upcoming/ongoing xulrunner transition, the packages its binaries depend on don't exist anymore, so a binNMU wouldn't work. There has been no maintainer upload in the la

Re: Bug#520662: O: iceape -- The Iceape Internet Suite

2009-08-20 Thread Mike Hommey
On Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 03:13:38PM +0200, Ana Guerrero wrote: > > Hi Mike and all, > > On Sat, Mar 21, 2009 at 06:45:01PM +0100, Mike Hommey wrote: > > Package: wnpp > > Severity: normal > > > > See the great thread about "Sponsorship requirements an

Re: the new style "mass tirage" of bugs

2008-02-24 Thread Mike Hommey
est to take the maintenance of the > graph generation within the QA team. Anyone should be free to work with > Mike Hommey and do that. Maybe Mike can say a word on this topic, I > haven't checked but I expect the code to be easy to find on its accont on > gluck. The main script is

Re: QA needed for insecure LD_LIBRARY_PATH in many wrapper scripts

2007-11-16 Thread Mike Hommey
On Fri, Nov 16, 2007 at 10:01:34PM +0100, Stefan Fritsch wrote: > Hi, > > many wrapper scripts contain things like > > export LD_LIBRARY_PATH=foo:$LD_LIBRARY_PATH > > This is bad because if LD_LIBRARY_PATH is unset, it will expand to > > LD_LIBRARY_PATH=foo: > > which is interprete

Re: RFC: use readable $(cmd) syntax instead of unreadable `cmd`

2007-02-10 Thread Mike Hommey
On Sat, Feb 10, 2007 at 10:59:09AM +0200, Jari Aalto <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Le't call this "wishlist" if we need to be pedantic. I would still > call this a bug from a QA perspective. Quality is more than "valid > syntax". `` vs $(), QA ? OMFFSM Mike -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PR

Re: Proposal for collaborative maintenance of packages

2005-12-19 Thread Mike Hommey
> Am Sonntag, den 18.12.2005, 17:19 +0100 schrieb Raphael Hertzog: > > This infrastructure is seriously needed in Debian because: > > - team maintenance with SVN is more and more popular, and a good web > > interface above a SVN repo of Debian packages would help all those > > teams > > I'd b