Package: qa.debian.org
Severity: normal
Since recently, packages.qa.debian.org and now qa.debian.org are the only web
sites in the world that underline hyperlinks. This hurts my eyes. My browser
can decide for itself when to underline links.
Please change the revamp.css stylesheet to remove
The last upload that the PTS can attribute to Matt was 2005-01-20, and
the packages that he maintains are growing worse in shape. At least
the following packages need new maintainers:
apt-listchanges (4 NMUs)
dhcp (4 NMUs, comaintainer known to have retired)
rrdtool (6 NMUs, comaintainer known
I see that Stephen still makes uploads on some of his packages, but I
strongly suggest that he give away some of them because they're in
really bad shape. Thanks.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Something has to be done about the postgis package. There are RC bugs on
uninstallability and FTBFS as well as several functionality bugs and two new
upstream releases and no one seems to do anything. The packaging seems to be
sufficiently ugly that it may be better to request removal and
There are a few dozen source packages in the archive that contain a file
called debian/rules.old. In many cases, this was apparently the backup
copy during a cdbs conversion or something similar that should have
been removed. If you appear below, please consider fixing this.
Guenter Geiger
As near as I can tell, nobody is maintaining cdbs anymore. The bugs and
patches are evidently piling up. I have been trying over the last two
months to get in contact with the listed maintainers to get me involved
in helping with the maintenance, without much success. Most of these
people
Thank you for your recent clarifications about the popcon display on
developer.php. It seems, however, the the displayed numbers are a
little random. They are apparently taken from some (arbitrary?) binary
package associated with the given source package (e.g., glibc shows a
popcon value of
I would like to protest the removal of the popcon link from the developer.php
display. I think the pool link is significantly less useful. (Who needs
that anyway?) What was the reason for this change?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble?
I wrote:
I think the watch columns on developer.php have stopped updating
some time ago.
I think this may have to do with queries on
http://dehs.alioth.debian.org/ taking forever. Perhaps the database
has crashed or something?
I think the watch columns on developer.php have stopped updating some
time ago. I see several packages on my page[1] that show old version
numbers although a direct uscan in the package build directory shows
never versions available. Can someone check what's going on?
[1]
I tried to contact John R. Daily on 2004-11-07 about the status of his
package ldp-docbook-stylesheets, without response so far. This package
has not seen activity in over two years in spite of upstream activity
and has several wishlist bugs from the maintainer to himself.
I don't seem to
Package: qa.debian.org
Severity: normal
The watch report for experimental packages never disappears from the DDPO
even after the packages are removed from the experimental distribution.
For example, http://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=peter_e%40gmx.net,
still shows watch information for
Package: qa.debian.org
Severity: normal
The magenta color coding of the watch column indicates that it thinks
that the upstream version 1.0.00.004-2 is greater than the current
Debian package version 1.0.00.004-2+cvs20040825-1. This doesn't
match dpkg --compare-versions.
See
Michael Bell wrote:
we tried to contact the maintainer of libnet-server-perl for a while.
We tried this via email and IRC but we were not able to contact him.
Are you able to contact him?
The package is already orphaned and has an ITA for it. An updated
package is being prepared as I write
Package: qa.debian.org
Severity: normal
Example: Go to
http://qa.debian.org/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
For the package pinentry, the column watch/upstream unstable shows an
error. A click on Details leads to
http://dehs.alioth.debian.org/maintainer.php?name=pinentry
which shows nothing about
Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
Your message dated Sun, 25 Jul 2004 15:53:49 +0200
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Upstream version is now available in developer.php
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This is all very nice, but now I need three
Igor Genibel wrote:
I thought about that but I'have the same impression than Andreas on
developer.php: it is very useful to have a good overview.
To save some space, it should be enough to have one column related to
the watch information: use the watch file in the package if
available, else
17 matches
Mail list logo
