Hi Raphaël,
On Thu, Aug 17, 2023 at 02:07:22PM +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> Hello Ralf,
>
> Le samedi 15 juillet 2023, Ralf Treinen a écrit :
> > In fact it is not related to dose-distcheck being outdated on quantz, I
> > get the same error with dose-distcheck on sid.
&g
Hello,
On Mon, Jul 17, 2023 at 10:35:24AM +0200, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
> On 17/07/2023 07.16, Helmut Grohne wrote:
> > Then I found trei...@debian.org using edos-file-overwrite. That latter
> > one seems like what I need here. Should we move it to the qa space and
> > drop the edos part? I sugge
In fact it is not related to dose-distcheck being outdated on quantz, I
get the same error with dose-distcheck on sid.
Since I do not have time to dig further into this atm (leaving for vacation)
I have now desactivated the unstable_main scenario, which is the only
one where the error is occurring
Hello,
On Mon, Jul 10, 2023 at 01:35:44PM +0800, Paul Wise wrote:
> Package: qa.debian.org
> Severity: important
> User: qa.debian@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: dose
> X-Debbugs-CC: Ralf Treinen
>
> The dose cron job has been producing these errors since 2023-07-02:
On Thu, Nov 08, 2018 at 10:06:02PM +0530, Lakshmipathi.G wrote:
> or `autopkgtest -d -B /path/to/helloworld.deb -- null` it says
> "autopkgtest: error: You must specify source
you have to run it on a source package, after having installed the binary
packages. Something like :
autopkgtest -d
On Sat, Apr 01, 2017 at 11:03:42PM +0200, Mattia Rizzolo wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 01, 2017 at 07:26:20PM -, trei...@users.alioth.debian.org
> wrote:
> > Author: treinen
> > Date: Sat Apr 1 19:26:19 2017
> > New Revision: 3601
> >
> > URL: http://svn.debian.org/wsvn/qa/?sc=1&rev=3601
> > Log:
> >
Hi,
On Thu, Sep 22, 2016 at 07:07:00PM +, Niels Thykier wrote:
> On Tue, 19 Apr 2016 09:41:42 +0200 Johannes Schauer
> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Fri, 18 Mar 2016 09:11:29 +0100 Ralf Treinen wrote:
> > > the dose services on qa.debian.org currently do
Package: qa.debian.org
User: qa.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: dose
Blocks: 818463
the dose services on qa.debian.org currently do not support xz
input files.
-Ralf.
Hi,
On Fri, Jul 17, 2015 at 02:36:43PM +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> On Fri, 17 Jul 2015, Johannes Schauer wrote:
> > > I think for the tracker we would want a custom format, in case the
> > > dose3 raw data format/schema changes.
> >
> > right. I think that makes sense.
>
> I don't see how it
Hi,
On Fri, Jul 17, 2015 at 12:06:23PM +0800, Paul Wise wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 16, 2015 at 6:38 PM, Johannes Schauer wrote:
>
> > it would be useful to show information about unsatisfiability of binary
> > and source packages in DMD and the tracker. For that, qa.d.o/dose should
> > export machine r
On Fri, Jul 17, 2015 at 03:36:17PM +0800, Paul Wise wrote:
> Package: qa.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> User: qa.debian@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: dose
> X-Debbugs-CC: Ralf Treinen
>
> The 'ctrl' links for the binary packages mentioned on dose pages link
ted to receive a message when someone does changes to
the dose scipts.
-Ralf.
--
Ralf Treinen
Laboratoire Preuves, Programmes et Systèmes
Université Paris Diderot, Paris, France.
http://www.pps.univ-paris-diderot.fr/~treinen/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a
On Wed, Jun 03, 2015 at 11:23:47PM +0200, Francesco Poli (wintermute) wrote:
> Package: tracker.debian.org
> Severity: wishlist
> Please enable the bug statistics box even for packages with zero bugs.
seconded. One also might want to consult archived bugs of the package.
-Ralf.
--
To UNSUBSCR
On Tue, Jun 02, 2015 at 02:58:53PM +0800, Paul Wise wrote:
> On Mon, 2015-06-01 at 21:50 +0200, Ralf Treinen wrote:
>
> > should be done now.
>
> Thanks for that, with today's dose-job we are down to this:
>
> (W)Sources: modifier any for indep dependency python u
On Mon, Jun 01, 2015 at 12:16:43PM +0800, Paul Wise wrote:
> On Mon, 2015-06-01 at 05:47 +0200, Johannes Schauer wrote:
> > Quoting Ralf Treinen (2015-05-31 22:16:54)
> > > Josch : isn't that something that can be fixxed by passing the right
> > > --deb-native-arc
On Mon, Jun 01, 2015 at 12:16:43PM +0800, Paul Wise wrote:
> On Mon, 2015-06-01 at 05:47 +0200, Johannes Schauer wrote:
> > Quoting Ralf Treinen (2015-05-31 22:16:54)
> > > Josch : isn't that something that can be fixxed by passing the right
> > > --deb-native-arc
On Sun, May 31, 2015 at 03:35:16PM +0200, Johannes Schauer wrote:
> The bad news is, that this error also affects dose-distcheck 3.3-3 in
> unstable.
>
> The good news is, that I fixed the problem shortly after the 3.3 release.
>
> The bad news is, that there is no release of dose3 with the fix
On Thu, May 21, 2015 at 08:50:18PM +0800, Paul Wise wrote:
> On Thu, May 21, 2015 at 8:36 PM, Johannes Schauer wrote:
> > Quoting Ralf Treinen (2015-05-21 14:31:09)
> >> do you remember from which version on dose supports parsing of Sources
> >> files
> >> with
Hi Josch,
On Thu, May 21, 2015 at 06:50:12PM +0800, Paul Wise wrote:
> Package: qa.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> User: qa.debian@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: does
> X-Debbugs-CC: Ralf Treinen
>
> The dose cron job on qa.debian.org returns fatal parsing errors (see
On Wed, Mar 18, 2015 at 10:28:46PM +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> On 18/03/15 at 13:21 -0700, j...@joshtriplett.org wrote:
> > On Wed, Mar 18, 2015 at 08:14:20PM +0100, Ralf Treinen wrote:
> > > On Wed, Mar 18, 2015 at 10:59:35AM -0700, j...@joshtriplett.org wrote:
> > &g
On Wed, Mar 18, 2015 at 10:59:35AM -0700, j...@joshtriplett.org wrote:
> And I'd like to search for things like filename conflicts and compare
> them to package metadata; for instance, do packages that ship the same
> filename conflict or not, and do the versions of the conflict match the
> versio
Hi,
On Sat, Oct 25, 2014 at 02:01:47AM +0100, peter green wrote:
> The dose uninstability pages were last updated 2014-10-19 05:00:05
Indeed.
> I was advised on irc by pabs that you were responsible for the pages, can
> you take a look and try and get them updating again so that we can use them
Package: qa.debian.org
Severity: wishlist
User: debian-qa@lists.debian.org
Usertags: debsources
Hi,
I would like to have the possibility to search in a known file (I know the
source package name, the source version, and the path) for a multi-line
pattern. This would be useful for the reports gene
On Sat, May 24, 2014 at 04:53:20PM +0800, Paul Wise wrote:
> Poll:
>
> 1. Are you planning on attending DebConf14
> 2. Would you be interested in such a sprint?
> 3. What areas of QA would you work on or chat about?
1 yes
2 yes, but I have already my flight booked (arrival on 22/8
On Sat, Feb 22, 2014 at 07:52:38AM +0800, Paul Wise wrote:
> I'm not part of DSA but it looks like quantz is suitable...
thanks Paul, I think I will go for quantz then.
Cheers -Ralf.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contac
Hello,
On Thu, Feb 20, 2014 at 10:01:59PM +, Stephen Gran wrote:
> This one time, at band camp, Lucas Nussbaum said:
> > Now, that's my perception. If DSA is fine with adding another service
> > under qa.d.o, I personally don't have anything against it.
>
> I guess there are two parts to this
Hello,
On Tue, Feb 18, 2014 at 09:39:05PM +0100, Julien Cristau wrote:
> Hi,
>
> for a while Ralf has taken care of the edos.debian.net service which
> runs an installability checker over the unstable/testing/stable Packages
> files. In recent months that service has suffered from availability
>
Hi Simon,
On Tue, Aug 02, 2011 at 08:14:49AM +0200, Simon Kainz wrote:
> this is my first posting to QA, so here I go:
welcome to QA ;-)
> Trying to work on WNPP packages and looking through several package
> descriptions, i noticed that several feature intermixed upper- and
> lowercase version
Hi,
On Wed, Feb 09, 2011 at 10:14:37AM +0100, Ralf Treinen wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 30, 2011 at 07:34:59PM +0100, Ralf Treinen wrote:
>
> > the debian QA meeting will take place March 18 to 20 at Irill in Paris.
> During FOSDEM we had discussed the planned QA meeting, and in fact
Hello,
On Sun, Jan 30, 2011 at 07:34:59PM +0100, Ralf Treinen wrote:
> the debian QA meeting will take place March 18 to 20 at Irill in Paris.
> Please see the wiki page [1] for details.
>
> Non-local participants asking for sponsoring: please fill in on the
> wiki page
> - th
Hello,
the debian QA meeting will take place March 18 to 20 at Irill in Paris.
Please see the wiki page [1] for details.
Non-local participants asking for sponsoring: please fill in on the
wiki page
- the estimated travel cost for which you need sponsoring,
- the number of nights you will spend i
Hi,
On Thu, Nov 04, 2010 at 09:01:35AM +0100, Ralf Treinen wrote:
> I agree, weekends will be easier for most people. I was thinking of
> a meeting Friday afternoon to Sunday noon so that people can travel
> to Paris on Friday morning and return on Sunday afternoon.
I have set up a wik
Hi,
On Tue, Nov 02, 2010 at 11:04:22PM +0100, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> Well, it can't be both very close to FOSDEM and during a week-end, as
> FOSDEM *is* during a week-end. Personally, I've the impression that
> people will be more likely to attend if it's during a week-end and, at
> the same
Hi,
what about having again a debian QA meeting? If I am not mistaken the
last ones were in november/december 2006, 2007, and 2008.
Concretely: we could have a meeting here in Paris at the brand new
Center for Research and Innovation on Free Software (IRILL [1]). The
location is close to Place d'
On Sun, May 30, 2010 at 02:10:35PM +0200, Christoph Berg wrote:
> Re: Ralf Treinen 2010-05-26 <20100526194043.gc2...@free.fr>
> > I am afraid there is currently no way. This would require architecture
> > constraints for relations between binary packages like
> &
Hello,
On Wed, May 26, 2010 at 07:51:26PM +0900, Hideki Yamane wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Debcheck reports "cannot be satisfied on kfreebsd" to package which I
> maintain.
> http://qa.debian.org/debcheck.php?dist=unstable&package=ccspatch
>
> However, package pulled by Recommends is not built on kfree
f these bugs. In most cases
these are conflicts with very old versions of packages, sometimes
from the pre-policy era.
-Ralf
--
Ralf Treinen
Laboratoire Preuves, Programmes et Systèmes
Université Paris Diderot, Paris, France.
http://www.pps.jussieu.fr/~treinen/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
On Fri, Sep 19, 2008 at 10:03:02AM +, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
> Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
>
> > reassign 60810 qa.debian.org
> Bug#60810: check for packages with the same files
> Bug reassigned from package `general' to `qa.debian.org'.
These tests are curently run
Hi,
On Mon, Mar 24, 2008 at 12:06:16PM +0100, Marc Dequènes wrote:
>
> Package: qa.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> Looking at my DDPO page here :
> http://qa.debian.org/[EMAIL PROTECTED]&comaint=yes
> It seems, for example, 'activeldap' is uninstallable in unstable for :
> alpha arm hurd-i38
On Thu, Dec 06, 2007 at 08:48:29PM +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> On 06/12/07 at 20:39 +0100, Luk Claes wrote:
> > What do other members of the QA Team think?
>
> Adding mario,ana: seconded, of course.
>
> Giving sudo access to everybody: not sure if it's needed. Those who need
> it should have i
Hello,
On Sat, Dec 01, 2007 at 12:44:05PM +0100, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> I'd like to know whether it would be feasible to have a symlink from
> e.g. [1] pointing to the latest run, so that we can fetch the diffs
> directly without having to parse the summary page [2] to get the
> timestamp or th
Hi,
On Sat, Dec 01, 2007 at 12:44:05PM +0100, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> I'd like to know whether it would be feasible to have a symlink from
> e.g. [1] pointing to the latest run, so that we can fetch the diffs
> directly without having to parse the summary page [2] to get the
> timestamp or the l
Hello,
On Sat, Jul 21, 2007 at 05:23:10PM +0200, Filippo Giunchedi wrote:
> is there a list of packages uninstallable (in sid for example) since a long
> time
> (e.g >= 15-20 days)?
>
> I first thought at edos.debian.net but it shows only differences with the run
> before, which is nice but the
Hello,
On Sat, Jul 21, 2007 at 05:23:10PM +0200, Filippo Giunchedi wrote:
> is there a list of packages uninstallable (in sid for example) since a long
> time
> (e.g >= 15-20 days)?
http://brion.inria.fr
You can access the so-called liftable of a package like this
http://brion.inria.fr/anla/l
On Tue, Mar 06, 2007 at 03:04:46PM -, Regis Boudin wrote:
> On Tue, March 6, 2007 11:46, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > On 06/03/07 at 07:34 +0100, Bart Martens wrote:
> >> I think that it's difficult to find an approach for an efficient
> >> all-packages review about old/obsolete confli
Hello,
On Tue, Mar 06, 2007 at 12:46:23PM +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 06/03/07 at 07:34 +0100, Bart Martens wrote:
> > I think that it's difficult to find an approach for an efficient
> > all-packages review about old/obsolete conflicts.
>
> it might be interesting to talk to the E
Hi,
On Wed, Dec 27, 2006 at 01:14:39PM +0100, Frederic Lehobey wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Sun, Dec 24, 2006 at 11:40:58AM +0100, Holger Levsen wrote:
> > On Friday 22 December 2006 15:25, Bill Allombert wrote:
> > > > m68k can be removed from testing and amd64 should be removed from
> > > > stable...
>
On Mon, Dec 18, 2006 at 04:59:13PM +0100, Holger Levsen wrote:
> On Monday 18 December 2006 16:45, Holger Levsen wrote:
> > Can you please update it twice a day (after britney/dinstall runs) via
> > cron?! Would be very cool!
>
> And while you're at it ;) (or add it to your todo-list...):
>
> m6
48 matches
Mail list logo
