Bug#1058545: due to #1058653

2024-03-16 Thread Rene Engelhard
block 1058545 by 1058653 tag 1058545 + patch thanks Hi, This is due to > dh_installdocs: error: Cannot find (any matches for) "doc/Esnacc.pdf" (tried in .) which is due to (cd /home/rene/esnacc-1.8.1/doc && unzip eSNACCManuals.zip && libreoffice --headless --convert-to pdf Esnacc.doc)

Bug#1066970: FTBFS: error: implicit declaration of function 'InitNibbleMem' [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]

2024-03-16 Thread Rene Engelhard
Source: esnacc Version: 1.8.1-3 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Tags: sid ftbfs User: lu...@debian.org Usertags: ftbfs-impfuncdef Hi, esnacc FTBFS: gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -Wdate-time -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -I./asn1specs -I./asn1specs -I./c-lib/inc -g -O2

Re: Question regarding time_t transition

2024-03-12 Thread Rene Engelhard
Hi, Am 12.03.24 um 15:17 schrieb Raphaël Halimi: Are we supposed to report bugs against packages ending up with "t64" and missing the "Provides: " for affected architectures like armhf ? That Provides: is there for archs where the transition *doesn't* make a difference. In Debian:

Bug#964262: FTBFS: needs updated build-depends; needs to build-depend on libreoffice-dev-gui

2020-07-04 Thread Rene Engelhard
Source: openclipart Version: 1:0.18+dfsg-17 Severity: serious Dear Maintainer, Hi, as discussed back then in https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=952347 gengal was moved to libreoffice-dev-gui for the 7.x LO packages. These got uploaded to sid now [1]. Please build-depend on

Re: Bug#952347: Processed: reassign 952347 to libreoffice-dev, affects 952347

2020-03-14 Thread Rene Engelhard
Hi, On Sat, Mar 14, 2020 at 12:36:34PM +0100, Rene Engelhard wrote: > On Sat, Mar 14, 2020 at 12:20:00PM +0100, Andreas Beckmann wrote: > > Since you already have a gengal wrapper script, you could check for > > libreoffice-core being installed and error out with "please ins

Re: Processed: reassign 952347 to libreoffice-dev, affects 952347

2020-03-14 Thread Rene Engelhard
Hi, On Sat, Mar 14, 2020 at 12:36:34PM +0100, Rene Engelhard wrote: > Thinking about this now actually, maybe it suffices to use a > --disable-gui version of gengal.bin for -dev here... Will try.. Hmm, no, won't work. We don't build the nogui variant everywhere (double build), so we

Re: Processed: reassign 952347 to libreoffice-dev, affects 952347

2020-03-14 Thread Rene Engelhard
On Sat, Mar 14, 2020 at 12:20:00PM +0100, Andreas Beckmann wrote: > On 14/03/2020 09.51, Rene Engelhard wrote: > > Maybe split it out to a new libreoffice-dev-gui package or somesuch? (That > > would need NEW though, > > and thus will only be done with the 7.0 packages)? Bu

Re: Processed: reassign 952347 to libreoffice-dev, affects 952347

2020-03-14 Thread Rene Engelhard
retitle 952347 /usr/lib/libreoffice/program/gengal.bin: symbol lookup error: /usr/lib/libreoffice/program/gengal.bin: undefined symbol: _Z10getGlxPipev with libreoffice-core-nogui installed clone 952347 -1 reassign -1 src:openclipart retitle -1 openclipart: please add a explicit build-dependency

Bug#915060: link-grammar: autopkgtest relies on built binaries without matching dependencies

2018-11-29 Thread Rene Engelhard
Source: link-grammar Version: 5.5.0-1 Severity: serious Hi, $ cat debian/tests/control Tests: unit-tests Depends: @, python3-distutils, build-essential, hunspell-en-us, locales-all, default-jdk [!hppa !hurd-i386 !m68k !sh4], Restrictions: build-needed So far so good. But that means that in

Bug#862126: 1.14, obviously...

2017-05-08 Thread Rene Engelhard
retitle 862135 src:zookeeper: FTBFS with cppunit 1.14 AM_PATH_CPPUNIT/cppunit-config removed) retitle 862134 src:drumgizmo: FTBFS with cppunit 1.14 (AM_PATH_CPPUNIT/cppunit-config removed) retitle 862133 src:gnuradio: FTBFS with cppunit 1.14 (no C++11 support, required by cppunit) retitle

Bug#862126: src:zipios++: FTBFS with cppunit 0.14 (cppunit-config removed, errors ignored)

2017-05-08 Thread Rene Engelhard
Package: src:zipios++ Version: 0.1.5.9+cvs.2007.04.28-6 Severity: normal Dear Maintainer, [ cppunit 0.14 is not in Debian yet, see #861718. Thus normal for now ] On a rebuild test using ratt I noticed your package doesn't build with cppunit 0.14: [...] dh build --with autotools-dev

Bug#818907: live-build: Fails to integrate a binary package whose name contains an uppercase character

2016-03-21 Thread Rene Engelhard
Hi, I am not involved in live-build, but: On Mon, Mar 21, 2016 at 04:41:18PM +0100, Raphaël Hertzog wrote: > If you download a Nessus deb from here: > https://www.tenable.com/products/nessus/select-your-operating-system > > You get a Nessus-6.5.6-debian6_amd64.deb file for a "Nessus" package. >

Bug#788970: abiword: please adapt for libwps 0.4

2015-06-16 Thread Rene Engelhard
Source: abiword Version: 1:3.0.0-8 Severity: wishlist Tags: patch See https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=786713. libwps 0.4 was released in May and we should transition to that, especially because LibreOffice 5.0 strictly needs = 0.4 and won't work/build with earlier ones. As I

Bug#751577: docvert-libreoffice: outdated; new upstream release available

2014-06-14 Thread Rene Engelhard
Package: docvert-libreoffice Version: 4.0+dfsg-1 Severity: wishtlist Hi, docvert is outdated in Debian. Debian contains a 4.0+dfsg-1 while looking on http://static.holloway.co.nz/docvert/news.html the have been releases: Docvert 6 2nd April 2014 Ported Docvert to Python 3! Docvert 5.2

Bug#707340: fixed in docvert 6 upstream

2014-06-14 Thread Rene Engelhard
block 707340 by 751577 thanks This bug (707340) was already (silently) tagged upstream by taffit some weeks ago (https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?msg=14;bug=707340) but to make it clear: docvert 6.0 was released in April, which says: ### snip ### Docvert 6 2nd April 2014

Bug#751577: docvert-libreoffice: outdated; new upstream release available

2014-06-14 Thread Rene Engelhard
Hi, On Sat, Jun 14, 2014 at 03:33:05PM +0200, Rene Engelhard wrote: docvert is outdated in Debian. Debian contains a 4.0+dfsg-1 while looking on http://static.holloway.co.nz/docvert/news.html the have been releases: Docvert 6 2nd April 2014 Ported Docvert to Python 3! [...] Ported

Bug#707340: retitle; package is back to python3-uno

2013-07-15 Thread Rene Engelhard
retitle 707337 please support python3 (and python3-uno) retitle 707338 please support python3 (and python3-uno) retitle 707339 please support python3 (and python3-uno) retitle 707340 please support python3 (and python3-uno) retitle 707341 please support python3 (and python3-uno) retitle 707342

Re: Accepted sane-backends 1.0.23-1 (source amd64)

2013-07-06 Thread Rene Engelhard
Hi, On Thu, Jul 04, 2013 at 05:34:08PM +, Markus Koschany wrote: * Build-Depend on libtiff5-dev. Thanks to Michael Terry for the patch. (Closes: #681079) You shouldn't apply something like that without verifying stuff.. People file such stuff even when the stuff isn't yet ready..

Re: Accepted sane-backends 1.0.23-1 (source amd64)

2013-07-06 Thread Rene Engelhard
Hi, On Sat, Jul 06, 2013 at 02:36:22PM +0200, Rene Engelhard wrote: Please revert and wait for a *coodinated* transition here. Ah, well, it's maintained by QA anyway... Done myself. Regards, Rene -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-packages-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject

Bug#715163: sane-backends: unsatisfiable build-depends on libusb-1.0.0-dev on kfreebsd-*

2013-07-06 Thread Rene Engelhard
Package: sane-backends Version: 1.0.23-1 Severity: serious [ X-Debbugs-Cc to Markus, who introduced this. ] Hi, sane-backends (1.0.23-1) unstable; urgency=low [...] * Build-Depend on libusb-1.0-0-dev and enable libusb1.0 support in debian/rules. Thanks to Martin Pitt for the report and

Bug#681079: [r...@debian.org: Accepted sane-backends 1.0.23-3 (source amd64)]

2013-07-06 Thread Rene Engelhard
Hi, The fix in 1.0.23-1 need to be reverted, which I just did. Reasoning: http://lists.debian.org/debian-release/2013/07/msg00126.html - Forwarded message from Rene Engelhard r...@debian.org - Date: Sat, 06 Jul 2013 13:33:53 + From: Rene Engelhard r...@debian.org To: debian-devel

Bug#707340: please support python3 (and python3.3-uno)

2013-05-09 Thread Rene Engelhard
Package: docvert-libreoffice Version: 4.0-7 Severity: wishlist Tags: upstream Hi, LibreOffice 4.0 switched to python 3.3 as its (internal) python[1] and the LibreOffice 4.x packages in Debian thus build a pyUNO variant for that per default (python3.3-uno until python 3.3 - yes, really, = 3.3 is

Re: LibreOffice 4.0 and your package using pyUNO and python(3)-uno

2013-02-04 Thread Rene Engelhard
Hi again, On Sun, Feb 03, 2013 at 09:31:39PM +0100, Rene Engelhard wrote: A import uno in a python2 shell with python-uno still works; but I'd prefer - if you tested your package against the new python-uno to check whether more complex stuff works ;) - if you tested your package

Re: LibreOffice 4.0 and your package using pyUNO and python(3)-uno

2013-02-04 Thread Rene Engelhard
Hi, On Sun, Feb 03, 2013 at 09:31:39PM +0100, Rene Engelhard wrote: [...] Now - with LibreOffice 4.0 - python3 is the *default* python for LibreOffice so python3-uno is the preferred package in LibreOffices dependencies. That said, because of API stuff and string changes etc[1] it needs

LibreOffice 4.0 and your package using pyUNO and python(3)-uno

2013-02-03 Thread Rene Engelhard
Hi, since some months I am also building a python3-uno for pyUNO python3-uno | 1:3.5.4+dfsg-4 | wheezy| amd64, armel, armhf, i386, ia64, kfreebsd-amd64, kfreebsd-i386, mips, mipsel, powerpc, s390, s390x, sparc python3-uno | 1:3.5.4+dfsg-4 | sid |

Bug#663747: FTBFS with LibreOffice 3.5: basis-link gone/uninstallable with LibreOffice 3.5

2012-03-13 Thread Rene Engelhard
removal in LibreOffice 3.5 + * rebuild for LibreOffice = 3.5 + + -- Rene Engelhard r...@debian.org Mon, 13 Feb 2012 23:11:07 + + openclipart (0.18+dfsg-12) unstable; urgency=low * QA upload diff -u openclipart-0.18+dfsg/debian/control openclipart-0.18+dfsg/debian/control --- openclipart-0.18

Bug#589570: error: Unable to migrate to dependency based boot sequencing.

2010-07-20 Thread Rene Engelhard
Hi, On Sun, Jul 18, 2010 at 08:44:44PM +0200, Helmut Grohne wrote: # dpkg-reconfigure sysv-rc ... error: Unable to migrate to dependency based boot sequencing. error: Problems detected: package timidity left obsolete init.d script behind ... # I bet you removed timidity and didn't purge

Bug#580883: Allow 14e4:4320, it works

2010-05-10 Thread Rene Engelhard
severity 580883 wishlist thanks Hi, On Sat, May 08, 2010 at 03:41:00PM +0200, Jörg Sommer wrote: I've a Broadcom Corporation BCM4306 802.11b/g Wireless LAN Controller (rev 03) and it works fine with the fireware used by this package. I've downloaded and extracted it by hand. Ah, the old fun

Bug#570089: Processed: Re: Bug#377270: agg doesn't provide a shared library

2010-02-16 Thread Rene Engelhard
Hi, On Tue, Feb 16, 2010 at 12:39:08PM +, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote: Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: block 570089 with 377270 Bug #570089 [src:exactimage] exactimage: embedded copy of AGG Was not blocked by any bugs. Added blocking bug(s) of 570089: 377270

Re: Processed: Please fix your packages ;)

2010-01-25 Thread Rene Engelhard
Hi, On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 08:58:27AM +, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote: Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: # For the last 4 packages, please check bug #557604. # For the other packages, only a binNMU is necessary. # (except that real binNMUs are not supported on

Re: Processed: Please fix your packages ;)

2010-01-25 Thread Rene Engelhard
Hi, On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 10:23:14AM +0100, Rene Engelhard wrote: On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 08:58:27AM +, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote: Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: # For the last 4 packages, please check bug #557604. # For the other packages, only a binNMU

Re: Processed: Please fix your packages ;)

2010-01-25 Thread Rene Engelhard
Hi, On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 12:22:24PM +0100, Mike Hommey wrote: As said on IRC, they won't break, they will possibly shown as xx_XX instead of a nice label, if the remaining file is in the xx_XX (instead of xx-XX) I define that as break, admittedly only minor, though. There was a reason why

Re: Please fix your packages ;)

2010-01-25 Thread Rene Engelhard
Hi, On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 06:45:11PM +0100, Kurt Roeckx wrote: On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 09:56:00AM +0100, Mike Hommey wrote: # For the last 4 packages, please check bug #557604. # For the other packages, only a binNMU is necessary. # (except that real binNMUs are not supported on arch:all

Bug#559419: DDPO: Invalid link to changes file for packages in NEW

2009-12-04 Thread Rene Engelhard
reassign 559419 ftp.debian.org retitle 559419 http://ftp-master.debian.org/new.html: links to individual packages broken severity 559419 normal affects 559419 qa.debian.org thanks Hi, On Fri, Dec 04, 2009 at 09:41:00AM +0100, Micha Lenk wrote: if an upload sits in NEW for approval by the ftp

Bug#552124: qa.debian.org: bogusly warns about security issues when fixed

2009-10-23 Thread Rene Engelhard
On Fri, Oct 23, 2009 at 04:35:39PM +0200, Rene Engelhard wrote: CVE-2009-2139 Heap-based buffer overflow in svtools/source/filter.vcl/wmf/enhwmf.cxx ... CVE-2009-2140 Multiple heap-based buffer overflows in ... CVE-2009-3239 Buffer overflow in the EMF parser implementation in OpenOffice.org

Bug#552124: qa.debian.org: bogusly warns about security issues when fixed

2009-10-23 Thread Rene Engelhard
Package: qa.debian.org Severity: important Hi, let's look at http://packages.qa.debian.org/o/openoffice.org.html. We see at the top: There are 5 open security issues, please fix them. Let's look what they are: CVE-2009-0200 Integer underflow in OpenOffice.org (OOo) before 3.1.1 and ...

Bug#551521: [UDD] please expose a list of RC-buggy and/or ANY-buggy packages

2009-10-21 Thread Rene Engelhard
Hi, On Sun, Oct 18, 2009 at 10:57:26PM +0200, George Danchev wrote: packages with more than 10/100 open bugs (any kind of) That is a nonsensical measure. Big packages have many bugs. Many of them are upstream bugs. It doesn't make sense to use a hardcoded value like this. and eventually

Re: {My,Hun}spell dicts and OOo hyphenations/thesauri transition

2009-08-12 Thread Rene Engelhard
Hi, On Mon, Aug 03, 2009 at 12:35:47AM +0200, Rene Engelhard wrote: The plan is as follows: 1) all hyphenation patterns (hyph_*.dic) will move to /usr/share/hyphen. OOo can be configured with --with-external-hyph-dir to look there, scribus can add a symlink there or add a configure

{My,Hun}spell dicts and OOo hyphenations/thesauri transition

2009-08-02 Thread Rene Engelhard
Hi, I want to get this mess fixed up as soon as possible: (sid)r...@frodo:/usr/share/myspell/dicts$ ls de-BE.aff de_DE.dic DicOOo.sxw en-US.dicth_de_DE_v2.idx de-BE.dic de-DE.dic en_US.aff hyph_de_DE.dic th_en_US_v2.dat de_DE.aff de-LU.aff en-US.aff hyph_en_US.dic

Re: ifrench_1.4-23_amd64.changes ACCEPTED

2009-03-27 Thread Rene Engelhard
Hi, Debian Installer wrote: Accepted: ifrench_1.4-23.diff.gz to pool/main/i/ifrench/ifrench_1.4-23.diff.gz ifrench_1.4-23.dsc to pool/main/i/ifrench/ifrench_1.4-23.dsc ifrench_1.4-23_amd64.deb to pool/main/i/ifrench/ifrench_1.4-23_amd64.deb myspell-fr_1.4-23_all.deb to

Re: Remove ipw2200 and ieee80211?

2006-01-23 Thread Rene Engelhard
Hi, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote: ipw2200 and ieee80211 have been orphaned a few days ago. Since both are present in current 2.6 kernels (2.6.14 onwards) I'd recommend to remove them right away. See the buglogs. Already proposed this... Regards, Rene -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL

Bug#277687: developer.php: pending links not working

2004-10-21 Thread Rene Engelhard
Package: qa.debian.org Severity: normal Hi, see http://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=renecomaint=yes - openoffice.org has 15 (16) bugs tagged as pending but on neither link it actually shows them. you just get a empty buglist... Those bugs are shown normally on

Re: QA Upload best practices, 2nd draft

2004-07-18 Thread Rene Engelhard
Hi, Matthew Palmer wrote: * It's also important to ensure that the maintainer address is set correctly. The address has changed in the past, and some packages haven't had their maintainer address changed since it's orphaning (even after several QA uploads!), so ensure that the maintainer of

Re: Packages with no users and not in testing yet

2004-06-17 Thread Rene Engelhard
Andreas Tille wrote: On Tue, 1 Jun 2004, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote: mozilla-locale-ko mozilla-locale-zh-hk mozilla-thunderbird-locale-es I guess we should not dump these localisation packages ... At least the first two are horribly out of date... Grüße/Regards, René -- .''`. René

Re: Your Debian packages

2004-02-14 Thread Rene Engelhard
Hi, Pierre Machard wrote: Bugs w.r.t. CVS snapshot of a2ps will be fixed when I upload new package based on the old 4.13b. AbiWord bugs - Bug#231649 is not really abiword's bug (I've already uploaded new libwpd7 package a week ago and it doesn't enter the archive yet) and I have no idea

Bug#211228: developer.php: please supply repeatmerged=no

2003-09-16 Thread Rene Engelhard
Package: qa.debian.org Version: unavailable; reported 2003-09-16 Severity: wishlist Hi, me again :) http://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=rene; openoffice.org has dozens of merged bugs. I occassionally go over all bugs and do a mass severity-changing, reassigning, tagging etc. So what the

Bug#208212: developer.php: please show binary package links sorted?

2003-09-02 Thread Rene Engelhard
Hi, Igor Genibel wrote: * Raphael Goulais [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2003-09-02 10:39:51 +0200]: On Monday 01 September 2003 19:41, Rene Engelhard wrote: I know that display in the statusbar. The problem is not solved there because you still have to go through all of them and look

Bug#208212: developer.php: please show binary package links sorted?

2003-09-01 Thread Rene Engelhard
Hi, Igor Genibel wrote: Please make them somehow sorted (alphabetically probably, as the PTS seems doing). I did something in order to show these links less obfuscated. I have provided an title property to these links in order to be shown when you pass the mouse over them.

Bug#182031: Complement

2003-08-21 Thread Rene Engelhard
reopen 182031 thanks Hi Igor, Igor Genibel wrote: Also I have fixed the bug complement you provides me (Architecture specific packages don't have to provide buildd link). I think what you have done was a little bit to enthusiastic :-) See http://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=rene again,

Re: Moving packages from Requested to Can't be packaged

2003-04-25 Thread Rene Engelhard
be packaged and if the bug is archived - someone comes again with an ITP for that and someone has to explain him (or he does find out himself) that it cannot be packaged. Waste of time, no? Regards, Rene -- .''`. Rene Engelhard -- Debian GNU/Linux Developer : :' : http://www.debian.org | http

Bug#182031: developer.php: link to buildd reports sometime wrong/not senseful in contrib/non-free

2003-03-25 Thread Rene Engelhard
.. Oh, and BTW: when we're at it. Could you remove the buildd link for package who have only one arch package (Architecture: foo) too because there is nothing auobuilt too (see toshset on the above link as an example) Regards, Rene -- .''`. Rene Engelhard -- Debian GNU/Linux Developer : :' : http

Bug#182031: developer.php: link to buildd reports sometime wrong/not senseful in contrib/non-free

2003-02-22 Thread Rene Engelhard
/unstable Architecture: i386 Kernel: Linux stan 2.4.18 #1 Son Nov 3 01:29:12 CET 2002 i686 Locale: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- .''`. Rene Engelhard -- Debian GNU/Linux Developer : :' : http://www.debian.org | http://people.debian.org/~rene/ `. `' [EMAIL PROTECTED] | GnuPG-Key ID

Re: retitling ITP's [round 2]

2003-02-14 Thread Rene Engelhard
: Torsten Werner [EMAIL PROTECTED] [...] [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ I think this ITP/RFP is obsolete because a) slport4.5 is in Debian b) nidd said OOo needs 4.0, if you look the actual openoffice.org-bin 1.0.2-2, you'll see runs with libstlport4.5c102... Regards, Rene -- .''`. Rene Engelhard -- Debian GNU

Re: old ITP's

2002-09-08 Thread Rene Engelhard
development is slept or it died... Regards, Rene -- .''`.Rene Engelhard : :' :** Debian GNU/Linux Developer ** `. `' http://www.debian.org | http://people.debian.org/~rene/ `- [EMAIL PROTECTED] pgpyr4TI9Fbrd.pgp Description: PGP signature