submit that as patches to the bugs you noted.
More information can be found here: http://wiki.debian.org/qa.debian.org
Regards,
-Roberto
--
Roberto C. Sánchez
http://people.connexer.com/~roberto
http://www.connexer.com
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
ussion in #509935 (and the bugs that it is blocking) may be of
interest to you as well.
Regards,
-Roberto
--
Roberto C. Sánchez
http://people.connexer.com/~roberto
http://www.connexer.com
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Fri, Nov 14, 2008 at 09:23:54AM +0100, Stéphane Glondu wrote:
> Roberto C. Sánchez wrote:
> >> Actually, the maintainer is not really MIA. He has just orphaned grisbi,
> >> at my demand. See #505570.
> >>
> > I saw that. Did you want to retitle it to IT
On Thu, Nov 13, 2008 at 07:03:13PM +0100, Stéphane Glondu wrote:
> Roberto C. Sánchez a écrit :
> > Personally, I like the idea of a mailing list being listed in the
> > package's maintainer field for collaboratively maintained packages.
>
> I am not strongly against
On Thu, Nov 13, 2008 at 07:11:02PM +0100, Stéphane Glondu wrote:
> Roberto C. Sánchez a écrit :
> > Ordinarily, I think that the process starts by verifying whether the
> > maintainer is MIA. [...]
>
> Actually, the maintainer is not really MIA. He has just orphaned grisbi
On Tue, Nov 04, 2008 at 10:51:14PM +0100, Stéphane Glondu wrote:
> Roberto C. Sánchez wrote:
> > Personally, I like the idea of a mailing list being listed in the
> > package's maintainer field for collaboratively maintained packages.
>
> Fine for me.
>
> > Al
On Tue, Nov 04, 2008 at 10:06:33PM +0100, Stéphane Glondu wrote:
> Roberto C. Sánchez wrote:
> > That would be excellent. I see that you are currently in the NM queue.
> > If you like, I can let you take the lead and I can serve primarily to
> > review/sponsor your package u
On Tue, Nov 04, 2008 at 01:47:05PM +0100, Joyce Markoll wrote:
> On Tue, 04 Nov 2008 08:18:20 +0100
> Stéphane Glondu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Roberto C. Sánchez wrote:
> > > I personally use it every day (or nearly so), and so I would be willing
> &g
On Tue, Nov 04, 2008 at 08:18:20AM +0100, Stéphane Glondu wrote:
> Roberto C. Sánchez wrote:
> > I personally use it every day (or nearly so), and so I would be willing
> > to adopt it.
>
> Me too. I could help if needed.
>
That would be excellent. I see that you are c
ess!
> OK, few news here, but we are working very hard on Grisbi 0.6. "
>
> Thanks to consider my proposal : looking for a new maintainer for Grisbi.
>
I personally use it every day (or nearly so), and so I would be willing
to adopt it.
Regards,
-Roberto
--
Roberto C. S
The qa.debian.org/developer.php page is
already quite wide for "busy" packages or developers. If an additional
column were added, it should default to off and only be switched on for
those specifically opting in.
Regards,
-Roberto
--
Roberto C. Sánchez
http://people.connexer.com/~roberto
http://www.connexer.com
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Thu, May 01, 2008 at 11:39:32PM +0100, Enrico Zini wrote:
> On Thu, May 01, 2008 at 04:46:00PM -0400, Roberto C. Sánchez wrote:
>
> > I am curious how you could craft an upload that would use a key
> > (ostensibly not your own, since you would know what you are uploading
>
at would use a key
(ostensibly not your own, since you would know what you are uploading
anyway) where you could use some random DD's key to do the upload
without an email going to that DD. It seems like you would need to
forge the GPG signature.
Regards,
-Roberto
--
Roberto C. Sánchez
http
with the style changes to the BTS and
the PTS. Perhaps because they were complete style changes and not minor
tweaks. It was something completely different and not something that
just didn't look quite right compared to the old version.
Regards,
-Roberto
--
Roberto C. Sánchez
h
On Sat, Apr 26, 2008 at 08:33:55PM +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> On 26/04/08 at 11:43 -0400, Roberto C. Sánchez wrote:
> > On Sat, Apr 26, 2008 at 07:23:38PM +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> > > On 26/04/08 at 10:23 +0800, Paul Wise wrote:
> > > > On Wed, Apr 16, 2
On Sat, Apr 26, 2008 at 11:53:22PM +0800, Paul Wise wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 26, 2008 at 11:43 PM, Roberto C. Sánchez
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > The gain is not worth the poorer appearance to me.
>
> Perhaps a different colour would be better? Something
ot;, it now cuts off just after "Un" under "Debcheck."
The gain is not worth the poorer appearance to me.
Regards,
-Roberto
--
Roberto C. Sánchez
http://people.connexer.com/~roberto
http://www.connexer.com
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Thu, Apr 03, 2008 at 10:58:07PM +0200, Ondrej Certik wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 3, 2008 at 10:05 PM, Roberto C. Sánchez
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Thu, Apr 03, 2008 at 09:53:11PM +0200, Ondrej Certik wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > I started a wi
On Thu, Apr 03, 2008 at 09:53:11PM +0200, Ondrej Certik wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I started a wiki page:
>
> http://wiki.debian.org/EtchTransitionalPackages
>
Is there any way you could provide a by-DD list?
Regards,
-Roberto
--
Roberto C. Sánchez
http://people.connexer
mes.
>
> [1]http://packages.qa.debian.org/g/gambas.html
>
I had the same problem with an older version of ddccontrol. This was
actually a bug in dpkg-dev that was fixed months ago.
Regards,
-Roberto
--
Roberto C. Sánchez
http://people.connexer.com/~roberto
http://www.connexer.com
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
>
> What do you think?
>
I agree that the data should not be reaching the PTS in that form to
begin with.
Regards,
-Roberto
--
Roberto C. Sánchez
http://people.connexer.com/~roberto
http://www.connexer.com
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
impse.org should be replaced with webglimpse.net)
>
> I didn't see an automated way to do this?
>
Where are these references?
Regards,
-Roberto
--
Roberto C. Sánchez
http://people.connexer.com/~roberto
http://www.connexer.com
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
eople use it in Debian. However, it may be worth considering that
if too many sever bugs crop up it may be better to request removal.
Regards,
-Roberto
--
Roberto C. Sánchez
http://people.connexer.com/~roberto
http://www.connexer.com
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
ection if I file for removal on behalf of QA?
>
Go ahead. I am all about removing cruft.
Regards,
-Roberto
--
Roberto C. Sánchez
http://people.connexer.com/~roberto
http://www.connexer.com
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
I saw that, I immediately fixed it and
uploaded a new version.
Incidentally, would it be possible to have those same URLs linked from
the version strings listed on the NEW page [0]? Should I file a seperate
bug report for that?
Regards,
-Roberto
[0] http://ftp-master.debian.org/new.html
-
file to find the security team's
position on supporting that package.
Regards,
-Roberto
--
Roberto C. Sánchez
http://people.connexer.com/~roberto
http://www.connexer.com
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
pensate for every upstream who leaves their users in the lurch like this,
> sorry.
>
The situation with upstream changes to GNOME is a good example of this:
http://www.debian.org/releases/stable/amd64/release-notes/ch-information.en.html#s-gnome-desktop-changes
Regards,
-Roberto
--
Robe
27 matches
Mail list logo
