Package: reportbug
Version: 1.36
Severity: wishlist
on any multi-user system, it's possible that a single user may want to
use reportbug for a feature request, or to report a user-level bug.
however, there is no provision for using a per-user config file, so
the options are impersonation of root v
Package: kdelibs3-crypto
Version: N/A; reported 2001-12-27
Severity: serious
Justification: Policy 6.5
abridged output from dselect's installation procedure:
Unpacking kdelibs3-crypto (from ...)
Adding `diversion of /usr/lib/kde2/kio_https.la to ...
Adding `diversion of /usr/lib/kde2/kio_https.so
Package: postfix
Version: 0.0.20010502.SNAPSHOT-5
Severity: important
while installing package "smtpd" from woody:
dpkg: error processing /var/cache/apt/archives/smtpd_2.0-4_i386.deb
trying to overwrite `/usr/share/man/man8/smtpd.8.gz', which is also
in package postfix
need i say more?
i su
also sprach Colin Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002.01.07.1944 +0100]:
> Is there a real need to copy run-of-the-mill bug reports to -qa like
> this? I can see it making some amount of sense if the maintainer was
> very inactive and there was a good chance that an NMU would be required
> before some
your use of urgency=high in the future.
Also, please find yourself some co-maintainers. I would volunteer.
--
Please do not CC me when replying to lists; I read them!
.''`. martin f. krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
: :' :proud Debian developer, admin, and user
`. `'
> Hmm, when I loaded it in my browser I thought it redirected to
> people.d.o/~madduck, I guess I put in the wrong URL.
I liberated the domain and bestowed it upon Simon. If you need me to
put e.g. a redirector in place, let me know, as I have the setup for
that.
--
.''`.
APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.16-2-xen-amd64-k8
Locale: LANG=en_GB, LC_CTYPE=en_GB.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
--
Please do not send copies of list mail to me; I read the list!
.
e: to which
packages am i subscribed (using a regexp for the email match), and
which tags are set.
Thanks,
--
Please do not send copies of list mail to me; I read the list!
.''`. martin f. krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
: :' :proud Debian developer and
added.
--
Please do not send copies of list mail to me; I read the list!
.''`. martin f. krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
: :' :proud Debian developer and author: http://debiansystem.info
`. `'`
`- Debian - when you have better things to do than fixing a system
Package: qa.debian.org
Severity: wishlist
The requirement for the X-PTS-Approved header is IMHO questionably,
but I guess that's the way it is.
Could you let messages to keywords straight through, though?
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: host master.debian.org[70.103.162.30]
said: 550 messages to the
X-PTS-Approved header
# RFC 822 and 2822 say that headers must be ASCII. This kinda emulates
--
Please do not send copies of list mail to me; I read the list!
.''`. martin f. krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
: :' :proud Debian developer and author: http://debiansyste
}}
message = messages to the PTS require an X-PTS-Approved header
--
Please do not send copies of list mail to me; I read the list!
.''`. martin f. krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
: :' :proud Debian developer and author: http://debiansystem.info
`. `'`
`- Debian - w
e to do this? I'll look into writing that
script as soon as the keyword exists.
--
.''`. martin f. krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
: :' : proud Debian developer, author, administrator, and user
`. `'` http://people.debian.org/~madduck - http://debiansystem.in
robably during my vacation in August.
--
.''`. martin f. krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
: :' : proud Debian developer, author, administrator, and user
`. `'` http://people.debian.org/~madduck - http://debiansystem.info
`- Debian - when you have better thing
ires confirmation emails...
> I can give you a copy of the "live database" for more realistic
> tests if you want.
Please do. Just put it somewhere on alioth, e.g. ~madduck/pts
--
.''`. martin f. krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
: :' : proud Debian de
ot do anything.
If the tag is not present in either set, but
[EMAIL PROTECTED] exists, add it there.
If the tag is not present in either set, and
[EMAIL PROTECTED] does not yet exist, copy
[EMAIL PROTECTED] to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and add the
tag.
Does this sound like a reasonable strategy?
--
.'&
that way, so there's no point in keeping that bug
> open. Closing it now.
Isn't this exactly what wontfix is for? Not trying to play bug ping
pong, so if you disagree, just close it again and I won't spring to
action anymore.
--
.''`. martin f. krafft <[EMAIL
ts-control tags need to be removed from the
default set of tags.
--
.''`. martin f. krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
: :' : proud Debian developer, author, administrator, and user
`. `'` http://people.debian.org/~madduck - http://debiansystem.info
`- Debian - w
on the PTS was always
a hassle anyway.
--
Please do not send copies of list mail to me; I read the list!
.''`. martin f. krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
: :' : proud Debian developer, author, administrator, and user
`. `'` http://people.debian.org/~madduck - http://debi
s.
--
Please do not send copies of list mail to me; I read the list!
.''`. martin f. krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
: :' : proud Debian developer, author, administrator, and user
`. `'` http://people.debian.org/~madduck - http://debiansystem.info
`- Debian - when
t the debsums package.
--
.''`. martin f. krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
: :' : proud Debian developer, author, administrator, and user
`. `'` http://people.debian.org/~madduck - http://debiansystem.info
`- Debian - when you have better things to do than fixing s
21 matches
Mail list logo
