On Fri, Apr 12, 2013 at 10:20:43AM +0200, Simon Chopin wrote:
> While I like the idea of semantics in the data, if I receive a message
> from dak saying that apache2 has been uploaded, I don't expect it to
> contain anything else than the name of the package for the simple reason
> that it's pretty
(we should maybe continue this thread on soc-coordination only? Keeping
Olivier in Cc anyway)
Hi Olivier,
Quoting Olivier Berger (2013-04-10 13:35:13)
> I think that it would be great, for maximum interoperability (derivative
> distros, upstreams, others), if the data about Debian artifacts could
Hi.
(As I'm not following discussion outside of debian-qa, CC-ing all
parties... sorry for duplicates)
Nicolas Dandrimont writes:
>
> One of the key outcomes of getting such a system in place, is that everyone,
> everywhere, can start listening to the messages and using them, opening up
> lots
]] Ioan Eugen Stan
> Maybe we can discuss about this during DebConf, I'll be more available
> then. Are you/anyone interested?
It looks like I won't be making it to Debconf this year, I'm afraid.
--
Tollef Fog Heen
UNIX is user friendly, it's just picky about who its friends are
--
To UNSUB
Hello Tollef,
Yes, I am a bit familiar with Debian policy to re-use as much of the
ecosystem. I would like to see more Apache Software in Debian and a
stronger collaboration between the two communities. My packaging
skills are very low but I'm willing to put some effort into
maintaining some Apach
]] Ioan Eugen Stan
> I'm Ioan-Eugen. Sorry to barge in out of the blue. I'm a Debian user
> and contributor (l10n Romanian, inactive lately) and an Apache
> committer (James). The idea sounds great an I would love to see it
> happening. From what I guess by looking at the requirements you need
>
Hello,
I'm Ioan-Eugen. Sorry to barge in out of the blue. I'm a Debian user
and contributor (l10n Romanian, inactive lately) and an Apache
committer (James). The idea sounds great an I would love to see it
happening. From what I guess by looking at the requirements you need
some sort of ESB. From
On Tue, Apr 09, 2013 at 10:47:40PM +0200, Nicolas Dandrimont wrote:
> > I'm a prospective GSoC student as well as a Debian user and contributor,
> > and was looking for project ideas to submit for this year's GSoC when
> > Nicolas Dandrimont (olasd) mentionned to me fedmsg[1] and the current
> > st
Hi Raphael,
Quoting Raphael Hertzog (2013-04-09 15:58:48)
> Hello,
>
> On Tue, 09 Apr 2013, Simon Chopin wrote:
> > Fedora is in the process of implementing a message bus architecture,
> > fedmsg, that addresses the exact same issues. I was wondering if there
> > was people interested in using the
This would be an awesome feature! I cannot mentor it (I lack the
deeper knowledge in dak, wanna-build buildd and all the parts which
will be affected as well as the time) but I would help with this the
best I can (in providing docs and help, as well as code testing if
required).
Regards,
Matthi
Hi!
Adding soc-coordination@l.a.d.o in the loop and keeping context for them.
* Simon Chopin [2013-04-09 15:12:56 +0200]:
> Hi!
>
> I'm a prospective GSoC student as well as a Debian user and contributor,
> and was looking for project ideas to submit for this year's GSoC when
> Nicolas Dandrim
Hello,
On Tue, 09 Apr 2013, Simon Chopin wrote:
> Fedora is in the process of implementing a message bus architecture,
> fedmsg, that addresses the exact same issues. I was wondering if there
> was people interested in using the same technology for our
> infrastructure. I've sent this mail to the
Hi!
I'm a prospective GSoC student as well as a Debian user and contributor,
and was looking for project ideas to submit for this year's GSoC when
Nicolas Dandrimont (olasd) mentionned to me fedmsg[1] and the current
state of interfaces throughout the Debian infrastructure.
As far as I understand
13 matches
Mail list logo
