Raphael Hertzog wrote:
On Tue, 17 Jul 2007, martin f krafft wrote:
also sprach Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007.07.17.1642
+0200]:
The configuration has been lifted for the bounce handler. The
special header is still required for any non d.o machine. But it's
going to stay
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
reopen 380631
Bug#380631: do not require approved header for emails to tags
Bug reopened, originator not changed.
tags 380631 wontfix
Bug#380631: do not require approved header for emails to tags
There were no tags set.
Tags added: wontfix
thanks
reopen 380631
tags 380631 wontfix
thanks
also sprach Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007.07.17.1642
+0200]:
The configuration has been lifted for the bounce handler. The
special header is still required for any non d.o machine. But it's
going to stay that way, so there's no
On Tue, 17 Jul 2007, martin f krafft wrote:
also sprach Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007.07.17.1642
+0200]:
The configuration has been lifted for the bounce handler. The
special header is still required for any non d.o machine. But it's
going to stay that way, so there's
On Mon, Jul 31, 2006 at 02:25:35PM +0100, martin f krafft wrote:
Package: qa.debian.org
Severity: wishlist
The requirement for the X-PTS-Approved header is IMHO questionably,
but I guess that's the way it is.
Could you let messages to keywords straight through, though?
[EMAIL
Package: qa.debian.org
Severity: wishlist
The requirement for the X-PTS-Approved header is IMHO questionably,
but I guess that's the way it is.
Could you let messages to keywords straight through, though?
[EMAIL PROTECTED]: host master.debian.org[70.103.162.30]
said: 550 messages to the
6 matches
Mail list logo