Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
On 20/12/07 at 14:09 +0100, Joerg Jaspert wrote:
Hi
I think the fonts are nice as they are now. Too small makes it
unreadable and one needs to Ctrl+ everytime, which is bad.
But if zack follows zobels request to do JS stuff with the stylesheets
there could be an
Hi
I think the fonts are nice as they are now. Too small makes it
unreadable and one needs to Ctrl+ everytime, which is bad.
But if zack follows zobels request to do JS stuff with the stylesheets
there could be an alternate stylesheet that has tiny fonts.
--
bye Joerg
With a name like
On 20/12/07 at 14:09 +0100, Joerg Jaspert wrote:
Hi
I think the fonts are nice as they are now. Too small makes it
unreadable and one needs to Ctrl+ everytime, which is bad.
But if zack follows zobels request to do JS stuff with the stylesheets
there could be an alternate stylesheet that
Lars Wirzenius [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On to, 2007-12-20 at 14:09 +0100, Joerg Jaspert wrote:
I think the fonts are nice as they are now. Too small makes it
unreadable and one needs to Ctrl+ everytime, which is bad.
Personally, I would prefer it the style sheet didn't touch the font size
I think the fonts are nice as they are now. Too small makes it
unreadable and one needs to Ctrl+ everytime, which is bad.
Personally, I would prefer it the style sheet didn't touch the font size
at all. That way everyone can choose the base font size that suites
their situation best, once,
5 matches
Mail list logo