Re: Raphael Hertzog 2008-06-07 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> On Sat, 07 Jun 2008, Christian Perrier wrote:
> > As of now, oldstable is no longer supported (security-wise).
> >
> > I wonder whether it should still be listed on p.q.d.o pages in such
> > situations, which might be misleading to out users.
>
On Sat, 07 Jun 2008, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 07, 2008 at 12:20:04PM +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
>
> > On Sat, 07 Jun 2008, Christian Perrier wrote:
> > > As of now, oldstable is no longer supported (security-wise).
>
> > > I wonder whether it should still be listed on p.q.d.o pages
On Sat, Jun 07, 2008 at 12:20:04PM +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> On Sat, 07 Jun 2008, Christian Perrier wrote:
> > As of now, oldstable is no longer supported (security-wise).
> > I wonder whether it should still be listed on p.q.d.o pages in such
> > situations, which might be misleading to ou
Hi,
On Sat, 07 Jun 2008, Christian Perrier wrote:
> As of now, oldstable is no longer supported (security-wise).
>
> I wonder whether it should still be listed on p.q.d.o pages in such
> situations, which might be misleading to out users.
The PTS is mostly static and it's painful to make stuff a
Package: qa.debian.org
Severity: normal
As of now, oldstable is no longer supported (security-wise).
I wonder whether it should still be listed on p.q.d.o pages in such
situations, which might be misleading to out users.
(side comment: I think that the drop of support for oldstable has not been
5 matches
Mail list logo
