On Mon, 03 Nov 2008, Raphael Geissert wrote:
Do you know a perl implementation that works fine ?
Debbugs' (which is almost exactly the same as dpkg-dev's, differring by some
bug
fixes) passes the test suite.
If you know about the bug fixes, why didn't you tell us (dpkg team) about them
On 04/11/08 at 11:01 +0100, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
I thought we were
using dpkg-dev's perl implementation, but apparently we don't, since it
doesn't work.
Yes, you are: #504135
So there's no reason to ask them to switch to something else, they just need
to wait until dpkg is
2008/11/4 Raphael Hertzog [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Mon, 03 Nov 2008, Raphael Geissert wrote:
Do you know a perl implementation that works fine ?
Debbugs' (which is almost exactly the same as dpkg-dev's, differring by some
bug
fixes) passes the test suite.
If you know about the bug fixes,
On 02/11/08 at 19:27 -0600, Raphael Geissert wrote:
Package: qa.debian.org
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: udd
Hi,
This is mostly for those working directly on udd (lucas, HE, zack, christian,
kurt, etc). The implementation of deb/vercmp is incorrectly comparing a
couple of
Hi Lucas,
Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
Hi Raphael,
Do you know a perl implementation that works fine ?
Debbugs' (which is almost exactly the same as dpkg-dev's, differring by some bug
fixes) passes the test suite.
I thought we were
using dpkg-dev's perl implementation, but apparently we
Package: qa.debian.org
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: udd
Hi,
This is mostly for those working directly on udd (lucas, HE, zack, christian,
kurt, etc). The implementation of deb/vercmp is incorrectly comparing a
couple of versions, and for others it is returning a value other than -1, 0,
6 matches
Mail list logo
