On Sat, 2008-11-29 at 13:50 -0800, Russ Allbery wrote:
Holger Levsen [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
currently, mails send to [EMAIL PROTECTED] are only send to the address
listed
in maintainers and to those subscribed to the PTS. IMO they also should
be send to the addresses in Uploaders:.
Ben Hutchings [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Sat, 2008-11-29 at 13:50 -0800, Russ Allbery wrote:
Holger Levsen [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
currently, mails send to [EMAIL PROTECTED] are only send to the address
listed
in maintainers and to those subscribed to the PTS. IMO they also should
be
package: package.qa.debian.org
severity: wishlist
Hi,
currently, mails send to [EMAIL PROTECTED] are only send to the address listed
in
maintainers and to those subscribed to the PTS. IMO they also should be send
to the addresses in Uploaders:. Please do so.
regards,
Holger
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
reassign 507288 qa.debian.org
Bug#507288: mails to [EMAIL PROTECTED] should also be send to Uploaders:
Warning: Unknown package 'package.qa.debian.org'
Bug reassigned from package `package.qa.debian.org' to `qa.debian.org'.
--
Stopping processing
Hi,
On Saturday 29 November 2008 22:50, Russ Allbery wrote:
This does the wrong thing if the maintainer is a mailing list and
Uploaders are the people who do the uploads, doesn't it?
No, it doesn't.
I generally want
to get such mail only once, via the mailing list.
I prefer duplicate
* Holger Levsen [Sat, 29 Nov 2008 20:27:19 +0100]:
package: package.qa.debian.org
severity: wishlist
Hi,
currently, mails send to [EMAIL PROTECTED] are only send to the address
listed in
maintainers and to those subscribed to the PTS. IMO they also should be send
to the addresses in
Hi,
On Sunday 30 November 2008 01:20, Adeodato Simó wrote:
Why? Uploaders are probably subscribed to the PTS, *or* the maintainer
is a mailing list.
not always.
regards,
Holger
pgpznir7eLIuN.pgp
Description: PGP signature
* Holger Levsen [Sun, 30 Nov 2008 01:34:03 +0100]:
Hi,
On Sunday 30 November 2008 01:20, Adeodato Simó wrote:
Why? Uploaders are probably subscribed to the PTS, *or* the maintainer
is a mailing list.
not always.
Then that uploader does not want to receive mail, period. Unless you go
and
gregor herrmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
My personal approach for getting rid of the already existing multiple
instances of the same mail is a simple procmail recipe [0]; and since
the problem of duplicate mails already exists anyway (and needs to be
handled anyway) I second Holger's
On Sat, 29 Nov 2008 17:32:57 -0800, Russ Allbery wrote:
My personal approach for getting rid of the already existing multiple
instances of the same mail is a simple procmail recipe [0]; and since
the problem of duplicate mails already exists anyway (and needs to be
handled anyway) I
10 matches
Mail list logo
