On Fri, 18 Feb 2011 19:37:13 +0100 Mike Hommey wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 18, 2011 at 07:14:01PM +0100, Mike Hommey wrote:
> > On Fri, Feb 18, 2011 at 06:53:50PM +0100, Francesco Poli wrote:
> > > On Fri, 18 Feb 2011 17:19:35 +0100 Mike Hommey wrote:
[...]
> > > > I also modified the rrdtool graph comma
On Fri, Feb 18, 2011 at 07:14:01PM +0100, Mike Hommey wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 18, 2011 at 06:53:50PM +0100, Francesco Poli wrote:
> > On Fri, 18 Feb 2011 17:19:35 +0100 Mike Hommey wrote:
> >
> > > On Sat, Oct 30, 2010 at 06:57:17PM +0200, Francesco Poli wrote:
> > > > In summary, I think that test-1
On Fri, Feb 18, 2011 at 06:53:50PM +0100, Francesco Poli wrote:
> On Fri, 18 Feb 2011 17:19:35 +0100 Mike Hommey wrote:
>
> > On Sat, Oct 30, 2010 at 06:57:17PM +0200, Francesco Poli wrote:
> > > In summary, I think that test-1 could be considered OK, unless we
> > > manage to find a way to furthe
On Fri, 18 Feb 2011 17:19:35 +0100 Mike Hommey wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 30, 2010 at 06:57:17PM +0200, Francesco Poli wrote:
> > In summary, I think that test-1 could be considered OK, unless we
> > manage to find a way to further enhance the result...
>
> This was long overdue, but the graphs are now
On Sat, 30 Oct 2010 09:21:45 +0200 Mike Hommey wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 30, 2010 at 12:10:43AM +0200, Francesco Poli wrote:
> > On Thu, 28 Oct 2010 16:49:00 +0200 Mike Hommey wrote:
[...]
> > > Tried to set all of the above on the new graphs on
> > > http://qa.debian.org/data/bts/graphs
> >
> > They
On Sat, Oct 30, 2010 at 12:10:43AM +0200, Francesco Poli wrote:
> On Thu, 28 Oct 2010 16:49:00 +0200 Mike Hommey wrote:
>
> > On Sun, Jul 18, 2010 at 03:44:33PM +0200, Francesco Poli wrote:
> > > Anyway: the documentation seems to state that the option
> > >
> > > --grid-dash 1:0
> > >
> > > w
On Thu, 28 Oct 2010 16:49:00 +0200 Mike Hommey wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 18, 2010 at 03:44:33PM +0200, Francesco Poli wrote:
> > Anyway: the documentation seems to state that the option
> >
> > --grid-dash 1:0
> >
> > will give solid grid lines.
> >
> > As far as the other issue is concerned (numb
On Sun, Jul 18, 2010 at 03:44:33PM +0200, Francesco Poli wrote:
> Anyway: the documentation seems to state that the option
>
> --grid-dash 1:0
>
> will give solid grid lines.
>
> As far as the other issue is concerned (number of horizontal grid
> lines) are you currently using the following op
Re: Mike Hommey 2010-10-10 <20101010070516.ga4...@glandium.org>
> I'd need rrdtool installed on quantz to go further and integrate the
> whole thing properly in qa.d.o. (I have a local install in my $HOME).
> Does such request need to go through DSA ?
Yes, but an informal prod on IRC is usually en
On Wed, Oct 06, 2010 at 11:38:47PM +0200, Christoph Berg wrote:
> Re: Mike Hommey 2010-10-04 <20101004083753.ga6...@glandium.org>
> > PS: quantz does't have UserDir enabled, so for the moment the graphs are
> > just sitting in my home. They will obviously move, eventually.
>
> For an ugly workarou
Re: Mike Hommey 2010-10-04 <20101004083753.ga6...@glandium.org>
> PS: quantz does't have UserDir enabled, so for the moment the graphs are
> just sitting in my home. They will obviously move, eventually.
For an ugly workaround, you can create a
/srv/qa.debian.org/web/~glandium/ symlink pointing to
On Mon, 04 Oct 2010, Mike Hommey wrote:
> For the record, I rsync'ed the data from merkel to my home on quantz,
> from where I started to run the cronjobs. This means merkel can go off
> and we shouldn't lose anything. I'll check that the cronjobs are running
> fine in the next few days. I'll also
On Sun, Oct 03, 2010 at 09:04:48AM +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> On Sun, 03 Oct 2010, Mike Hommey wrote:
> > I guess we should move to this machine soon... What would you need from
> > me?
>
> The qa machine is now quantz. I suggest you integrate your scripts and
> files in the qa svn repository
On Mon, Oct 04, 2010 at 11:13:31AM +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> On Mon, 04 Oct 2010, Mike Hommey wrote:
> > For the record, I rsync'ed the data from merkel to my home on quantz,
> > from where I started to run the cronjobs. This means merkel can go off
> > and we shouldn't lose anything. I'll ch
On Sun, 03 Oct 2010, Mike Hommey wrote:
> I guess we should move to this machine soon... What would you need from
> me?
The qa machine is now quantz. I suggest you integrate your scripts and
files in the qa svn repository, document the packages that you need
and make it go live on the new machine.
On Tue, Sep 07, 2010 at 09:28:39AM +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> On Mon, 06 Sep 2010, Mike Hommey wrote:
> > On Mon, Sep 06, 2010 at 09:15:58PM +0200, Mike Hommey wrote:
> > > On Mon, Sep 06, 2010 at 09:03:25PM +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> > > > On Mon, 06 Sep 2010, Mike Hommey wrote:
> > > >
On Tue, 07 Sep 2010, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> (Added debian-admin@ in Cc)
>
> On 07/09/10 at 09:28 +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> > On Mon, 06 Sep 2010, Mike Hommey wrote:
> > > On Mon, Sep 06, 2010 at 09:15:58PM +0200, Mike Hommey wrote:
> > > > On Mon, Sep 06, 2010 at 09:03:25PM +0200, Raphael
(Added debian-admin@ in Cc)
On 07/09/10 at 09:28 +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> On Mon, 06 Sep 2010, Mike Hommey wrote:
> > On Mon, Sep 06, 2010 at 09:15:58PM +0200, Mike Hommey wrote:
> > > On Mon, Sep 06, 2010 at 09:03:25PM +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> > > > On Mon, 06 Sep 2010, Mike Hommey
On Mon, 06 Sep 2010, Mike Hommey wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 06, 2010 at 09:15:58PM +0200, Mike Hommey wrote:
> > On Mon, Sep 06, 2010 at 09:03:25PM +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> > > On Mon, 06 Sep 2010, Mike Hommey wrote:
> > > > That being said, now that merkel is going to be shut down, maybe it's
> >
On Mon, Sep 06, 2010 at 09:15:58PM +0200, Mike Hommey wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 06, 2010 at 09:03:25PM +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> > On Mon, 06 Sep 2010, Mike Hommey wrote:
> > > That being said, now that merkel is going to be shut down, maybe it's
> > > time to do things right and properly migrate
On Mon, Sep 06, 2010 at 09:03:25PM +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> On Mon, 06 Sep 2010, Mike Hommey wrote:
> > That being said, now that merkel is going to be shut down, maybe it's
> > time to do things right and properly migrate and integrate with qa.d.o.
> >
> > QA people, what do you think?
>
On Mon, 06 Sep 2010, Mike Hommey wrote:
> That being said, now that merkel is going to be shut down, maybe it's
> time to do things right and properly migrate and integrate with qa.d.o.
>
> QA people, what do you think?
I'm all for it. What do you need to to this? :-)
Cheers,
--
Raphaël Hertzog
On Mon, 6 Sep 2010 16:54:51 +0200 Mike Hommey wrote:
> Hi,
Hello! :-)
>
> Sorry for the delay.
That's OK...
>
> On Sun, Jul 18, 2010 at 04:15:19PM +0200, Francesco Poli wrote:
> > On Sun, 18 Jul 2010 15:44:33 +0200 Francesco Poli wrote:
> >
> > [...]
> > > I hope what I said does not soun
Hi,
Sorry for the delay.
On Sun, Jul 18, 2010 at 04:15:19PM +0200, Francesco Poli wrote:
> On Sun, 18 Jul 2010 15:44:33 +0200 Francesco Poli wrote:
>
> [...]
> > I hope what I said does not sound too naive... :p
>
> Another option that may be nice to use is
>
> --right-axis 1:0
>
> This sh
On Sun, 18 Jul 2010 15:44:33 +0200 Francesco Poli wrote:
[...]
> I hope what I said does not sound too naive... :p
Another option that may be nice to use is
--right-axis 1:0
This should produce a second vertical axis on the right of the graph,
with scale=1 and shift=0, that is to say an exac
On Sun, 18 Jul 2010 15:20:30 +0200 Francesco Poli wrote:
> On Sun, 18 Jul 2010 11:34:56 +0200 Mike Hommey wrote:
[...]
> > I wouldn't mind someone searching for the appropriate rrd flags to make
> > that happen ;)
>
> Wow!
> I thought *you* were the rrdtool expert! ;-)
>
> As far as I am conce
On Sun, 18 Jul 2010 11:34:56 +0200 Mike Hommey wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 17, 2010 at 08:00:42PM +0200, Francesco Poli wrote:
[...]
> > I hope that constructive criticism may be helpful... :-)
>
> I wouldn't mind someone searching for the appropriate rrd flags to make
> that happen ;)
Wow!
I thought
On Sat, Jul 17, 2010 at 08:00:42PM +0200, Francesco Poli wrote:
> On Fri, 12 Feb 2010 20:42:35 +0100 Mike Hommey wrote:
>
> > On Fri, Feb 12, 2010 at 08:27:53PM +0100, Francesco Poli wrote:
> > > On Fri, 12 Feb 2010 19:53:48 +0100 Mike Hommey wrote:
> [...]
> > > > New graphs are available on http
On Fri, 12 Feb 2010 20:42:35 +0100 Mike Hommey wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 12, 2010 at 08:27:53PM +0100, Francesco Poli wrote:
> > On Fri, 12 Feb 2010 19:53:48 +0100 Mike Hommey wrote:
[...]
> > > New graphs are available on http://merkel.debian.org/~glandium/bts/
> >
> > They look nice!
> > They even l
On Fri, Feb 12, 2010 at 08:27:53PM +0100, Francesco Poli wrote:
> On Fri, 12 Feb 2010 19:53:48 +0100 Mike Hommey wrote:
>
> > On Fri, Feb 12, 2010 at 07:47:12PM +0100, Francesco Poli wrote:
> [...]
> > > Is it feasible to fix the RRD configuration?
> >
> > Not that I know (except for dumping data
On Fri, 12 Feb 2010 19:53:48 +0100 Mike Hommey wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 12, 2010 at 07:47:12PM +0100, Francesco Poli wrote:
[...]
> > Is it feasible to fix the RRD configuration?
>
> Not that I know (except for dumping data, editing dumps, and
> reimporting).
Well, I meant "to fix the RRD configurat
On Fri, Feb 12, 2010 at 07:47:12PM +0100, Francesco Poli wrote:
> On Fri, 12 Feb 2010 19:19:27 +0100 Mike Hommey wrote:
>
> > On Fri, Feb 12, 2010 at 07:16:37PM +0100, Francesco Poli wrote:
> [...]
> > > I am reopening this bug report, since it seems to me that the bug
> > > history graphs, althou
On Fri, 12 Feb 2010 19:19:27 +0100 Mike Hommey wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 12, 2010 at 07:16:37PM +0100, Francesco Poli wrote:
[...]
> > I am reopening this bug report, since it seems to me that the bug
> > history graphs, although regenerated daily, get out-of-date data, not
> > in sync with the package
On Fri, Feb 12, 2010 at 07:16:37PM +0100, Francesco Poli wrote:
> reopen 565219 !
> retitle 565219 qa.debian.org: bug history graphs are updated with excessive
> delay
> thanks
>
>
> On Wed, 20 Jan 2010 09:23:55 +0100 Raphael Hertzog wrote:
>
> > On Wed, 20 Jan 2010, Francesco Poli wrote:
> > >
reopen 565219 !
retitle 565219 qa.debian.org: bug history graphs are updated with excessive
delay
thanks
On Wed, 20 Jan 2010 09:23:55 +0100 Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> On Wed, 20 Jan 2010, Francesco Poli wrote:
> > If I understand correctly, the problem I reported is now fixed: as a
> > consequenc
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> reopen 565219 !
Bug #565219 {Done: Raphael Hertzog } [qa.debian.org]
qa.debian.org: bug history graphs are incorrect
Changed Bug submitter to 'Francesco Poli ' from
'"Francesco Poli \(t1000\)" '
> retitle 565219 qa.debian.org: bug history graphs
On Mon, 18 Jan 2010 10:19:27 +0100 Mike Hommey wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 18, 2010 at 09:54:53PM +1300, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> > On 18/01/10 at 09:40 +0100, Mike Hommey wrote:
> > > On Mon, Jan 18, 2010 at 09:33:24PM +1300, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
[...]
> > > > Fixed in http://udd.debian.org/cgi-bin/ddpo
On Mon, Jan 18, 2010 at 09:54:53PM +1300, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> On 18/01/10 at 09:40 +0100, Mike Hommey wrote:
> > On Mon, Jan 18, 2010 at 09:33:24PM +1300, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> > > On 17/01/10 at 10:26 +0100, Mike Hommey wrote:
> > > > The correct data is now gathered, but it doesn't solve *y
On 18/01/10 at 09:40 +0100, Mike Hommey wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 18, 2010 at 09:33:24PM +1300, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> > On 17/01/10 at 10:26 +0100, Mike Hommey wrote:
> > > The correct data is now gathered, but it doesn't solve *your* issue,
> > > which is due to something else, actually: the ddpo dat
On Mon, Jan 18, 2010 at 09:33:24PM +1300, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> On 17/01/10 at 10:26 +0100, Mike Hommey wrote:
> > The correct data is now gathered, but it doesn't solve *your* issue,
> > which is due to something else, actually: the ddpo data doesn't contain
> > anything for packages with no bug
On 17/01/10 at 10:26 +0100, Mike Hommey wrote:
> The correct data is now gathered, but it doesn't solve *your* issue,
> which is due to something else, actually: the ddpo data doesn't contain
> anything for packages with no bugs. So while the RRD files are updated
> when there are bugs, it stops be
On Sun, 17 Jan 2010 10:26:12 +0100 Mike Hommey wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 14, 2010 at 06:45:13PM +0100, Francesco Poli wrote:
[...]
> > I would be *more than happy* to see the graphs fixed for newer data
> > only!
>
> Which is now the case:
> http://people.debian.org/~glandium/bts/i/iceape.png
> The bi
On Thu, Jan 14, 2010 at 06:45:13PM +0100, Francesco Poli wrote:
> On Thu, 14 Jan 2010 09:06:56 +0100 Mike Hommey wrote:
>
> First of all, thanks to you all for your kind replies.
>
> [...]
> > I've been considering running a script on merkel to get the proper data
> > instead of the ddpo one, but
On Thu, 14 Jan 2010 09:06:56 +0100 Mike Hommey wrote:
First of all, thanks to you all for your kind replies.
[...]
> I've been considering running a script on merkel to get the proper data
> instead of the ddpo one, but that would only solve part of the problem,
> and only for newer data.
I thin
On Thu, Jan 14, 2010 at 09:06:56AM +0100, Mike Hommey wrote:
> I've discussed this with both zack and don @debconf and the outcome is
> that it would be better if it were integrated within the BTS.
>
> Now, as for the current graphs, I'm sorry to say that they just suck for
> several reasons:
> -
On Thu, Jan 14, 2010 at 08:37:09AM +0100, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> On Wed, 13 Jan 2010, Francesco Poli (t1000) wrote:
> > Package: qa.debian.org
> > Severity: normal
> >
> > Hi!
> >
> > The bug count (and consequently the plot shape) is often incorrect
> > in the bug history graphs.
> >
> > Cons
On Wed, 13 Jan 2010, Francesco Poli (t1000) wrote:
> Package: qa.debian.org
> Severity: normal
>
> Hi!
>
> The bug count (and consequently the plot shape) is often incorrect
> in the bug history graphs.
>
> Consider for instance:
> http://packages.qa.debian.org/d/dpkg-ruby.html
>
> The package
Package: qa.debian.org
Severity: normal
Hi!
The bug count (and consequently the plot shape) is often incorrect
in the bug history graphs.
Consider for instance:
http://packages.qa.debian.org/d/dpkg-ruby.html
The package currenty has 0 (zero) outstanding bugs and 8 unarchived
resolved bugs.
None
48 matches
Mail list logo
