Re: Bug#668051: RM: aafigure -- RoQA; orphaned, unused

2012-04-14 Thread Ricardo Mones
On Sat, Apr 14, 2012 at 05:16:28PM +0800, Paul Wise wrote: > On Sat, Apr 14, 2012 at 2:16 AM, Clint Adams wrote: > > On Fri, Apr 13, 2012 at 08:08:13PM +0200, Jakub Wilk wrote: > >> Thanks. This will teach me to never orphan packages, but pretend > >> that I'm maintaining them instead. > > > > I ha

Re: Bug#668051: RM: aafigure -- RoQA; orphaned, unused

2012-04-14 Thread Paul Wise
On Sat, Apr 14, 2012 at 2:16 AM, Clint Adams wrote: > On Fri, Apr 13, 2012 at 08:08:13PM +0200, Jakub Wilk wrote: >> Thanks. This will teach me to never orphan packages, but pretend >> that I'm maintaining them instead. > > I hate learning that lesson. Likewise. Such removals make me want to quit

Re: Bug#668051: RM: aafigure -- RoQA; orphaned, unused

2012-04-13 Thread David Prévot
Le 13/04/2012 14:16, Clint Adams a écrit : > On Fri, Apr 13, 2012 at 08:08:13PM +0200, Jakub Wilk wrote: >> Thanks. This will teach me to never orphan packages, but pretend >> that I'm maintaining them instead. > > I hate learning that lesson. Maybe requesting for adoption could fit better than o

Re: Bug#668051: RM: aafigure -- RoQA; orphaned, unused

2012-04-13 Thread Clint Adams
On Fri, Apr 13, 2012 at 08:08:13PM +0200, Jakub Wilk wrote: > Thanks. This will teach me to never orphan packages, but pretend > that I'm maintaining them instead. I hate learning that lesson. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Troubl

Re: Bug#668051: RM: aafigure -- RoQA; orphaned, unused

2012-04-13 Thread Jakub Wilk
* Moritz Muehlenhoff , 2012-04-08, 17:51: Please remove aafigure. It's orphaned since nearly two years and has very low popcon. Aha, yes, removing a perfectly good, bug-free package is indeed an excellent way to improve "quality". Thanks. This will teach me to never orphan packages, but pret