Re: Bug#699936: PTS: clang archive recompilation links

2013-02-13 Thread Paul Wise
On Sat, Feb 9, 2013 at 5:35 AM, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote: Small suggestion, can you please typeset it as: buildd: logs, ports, clang instead of buildd: logs, ports cland build log After all, from the PTS point of view, clang is yet another buildd toolchain. Done in SVN, moved

Re: Bug#699936: PTS: clang archive recompilation links

2013-02-13 Thread Stefano Zacchiroli
On Wed, Feb 13, 2013 at 04:23:04PM +0800, Paul Wise wrote: Done in SVN, moved the buildd log check too. Thanks! -- Stefano Zacchiroli . . . . . . . z...@upsilon.cc . . . . o . . . o . o Maître de conférences . . . . . http://upsilon.cc/zack . . . o . . . o o Debian Project Leader . . . . . .

Re: Bug#699936: PTS: clang archive recompilation links

2013-02-09 Thread Stefano Zacchiroli
On Fri, Feb 08, 2013 at 02:14:24PM -0800, Russ Allbery wrote: Given that it's reporting failures, personally I'd kind of like to have it in todo, but maybe there aren't enough people who are interested yet? The traditional way for that kind of things in the PTS was to have both. More precisely:

Bug#699936: PTS: clang archive recompilation links

2013-02-09 Thread Bernhard R. Link
* Sylvestre Ledru sylvestre.le...@scilab-enterprises.com [130208 17:37]: Lets start with a newline separated list of source packages that the PTS should link to. It will link to the clang source package URLs with the text clang build issues. It is was you expect ?

Bug#699936: PTS: clang archive recompilation links

2013-02-08 Thread Sylvestre Ledru
On 07/02/2013 12:33, Paul Wise wrote: On Thu, Feb 7, 2013 at 7:02 PM, Sylvestre Ledru wrote: I can do that this week end. :) Great :) We had this discussion a while ago: http://lists.debian.org/debian-qa/2012/02/msg00089.html Woops! At this time, you didn't had any preference on

Bug#699936: PTS: clang archive recompilation links

2013-02-08 Thread Paul Wise
On Sat, Feb 9, 2013 at 1:37 AM, Sylvestre Ledru wrote: It is was you expect ? http://clang.debian.net/pts.php It is basically $1 = package name $2 = version $3 = url to the log $4=end = the detected error Not sure you need the last item. Thanks, I've added a link to the build logs, you

Re: Bug#699936: PTS: clang archive recompilation links

2013-02-08 Thread Stefano Zacchiroli
On Sat, Feb 09, 2013 at 05:20:56AM +0800, Paul Wise wrote: Thanks, I've added a link to the build logs, you can see examples here until the next full build: Thanks Pabs! http://packages.qa.debian.org/0/0ad.html http://packages.qa.debian.org/w/warzone2100.html For now the code only uses

Re: Bug#699936: PTS: clang archive recompilation links

2013-02-08 Thread Paul Wise
On Sat, Feb 9, 2013 at 5:35 AM, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote: Small suggestion, can you please typeset it as: buildd: logs, ports, clang instead of buildd: logs, ports cland build log After all, from the PTS point of view, clang is yet another buildd toolchain. That would imply

Re: Bug#699936: PTS: clang archive recompilation links

2013-02-08 Thread Stefano Zacchiroli
On Sat, Feb 09, 2013 at 05:53:23AM +0800, Paul Wise wrote: That would imply showing it on every page, as we do for gcc build logs? Nope, I just meant to move the link on the line where (imho) better belongs. Not to change the semantics that regulates whether the link appears or not. Cheers. --

Re: Bug#699936: PTS: clang archive recompilation links

2013-02-08 Thread Russ Allbery
Stefano Zacchiroli z...@debian.org writes: On Sat, Feb 09, 2013 at 05:20:56AM +0800, Paul Wise wrote: Thanks, I've added a link to the build logs, you can see examples here until the next full build: Thanks Pabs! http://packages.qa.debian.org/0/0ad.html

Re: Bug#699936: PTS: clang archive recompilation links

2013-02-08 Thread Paul Wise
On Sat, Feb 9, 2013 at 6:14 AM, Russ Allbery wrote: Given that it's reporting failures, personally I'd kind of like to have it in todo, but maybe there aren't enough people who are interested yet? Probably problems is the better section although problems and todo are quite poorly

Re: Bug#699936: PTS: clang archive recompilation links

2013-02-08 Thread Russ Allbery
Paul Wise p...@debian.org writes: On Sat, Feb 9, 2013 at 6:14 AM, Russ Allbery wrote: Given that it's reporting failures, personally I'd kind of like to have it in todo, but maybe there aren't enough people who are interested yet? Probably problems is the better section although problems

Bug#699936: PTS: clang archive recompilation links

2013-02-07 Thread Sylvestre Ledru
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 07/02/2013 02:09, Paul Wise wrote: Package: qa.debian.org Severity: normal User: qa.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: pts X-Debbugs-CC: Sylvestre Ledru sylves...@debian.org The PTS should link to clang.debian.net for packages that fail

Bug#699936: PTS: clang archive recompilation links

2013-02-07 Thread Paul Wise
On Thu, Feb 7, 2013 at 7:02 PM, Sylvestre Ledru wrote: I can do that this week end. :) Great :) We had this discussion a while ago: http://lists.debian.org/debian-qa/2012/02/msg00089.html Woops! At this time, you didn't had any preference on the format. Is it still the case ? I write

Bug#699936: PTS: clang archive recompilation links

2013-02-06 Thread Paul Wise
Package: qa.debian.org Severity: normal User: qa.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: pts X-Debbugs-CC: Sylvestre Ledru sylves...@debian.org The PTS should link to clang.debian.net for packages that fail to build with LLVM/Clang. More information about clang.d.n is here: