On Thu, Nov 08, 2018 at 10:14:16PM +0100, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
> What about linking to the patches like packages.qa.debian.org is doing
> it, ie via https://sources.debian.org/patches/ ? See for example
> https://packages.qa.debian.org/c/conv-tools.html > for a package
> with the patches
On Fri, Nov 9, 2018 at 5:09 PM Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> On Thu, 08 Nov 2018, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
> > What about linking to the patches like packages.qa.debian.org is doing
> > it, ie via https://sources.debian.org/patches/ ? See for example
> >
Hi,
On Thu, 08 Nov 2018, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
> What about linking to the patches like packages.qa.debian.org is doing
> it, ie via https://sources.debian.org/patches/ ? See for example
> https://packages.qa.debian.org/c/conv-tools.html > for a package
> with the patches linked to from the
What about linking to the patches like packages.qa.debian.org is doing
it, ie via https://sources.debian.org/patches/ ? See for example
https://packages.qa.debian.org/c/conv-tools.html > for a package
with the patches linked to from the info page.
--
Happy hacking
Petter Reinholdtsen
Hi,
On Tue, 02 Sep 2014, Colin Watson wrote:
On Tue, Sep 02, 2014 at 10:57:19AM +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
I saw on #debian-admin that both of you are interested in resurrecting
patch-tracker.debian.org. I don't know what are your plans but I would
like to suggest you to try to
Hi Colin Henri,
I saw on #debian-admin that both of you are interested in resurrecting
patch-tracker.debian.org. I don't know what are your plans but I would
like to suggest you to try to resurrect it within the context of
Distro-Tracker aka the software behind http://tracker.debian.org
Distro
On Tue, Sep 02, 2014 at 10:57:19AM +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
I saw on #debian-admin that both of you are interested in resurrecting
patch-tracker.debian.org. I don't know what are your plans but I would
like to suggest you to try to resurrect it within the context of
Distro-Tracker aka the
On Tue, Sep 02, 2014 at 09:03:59PM +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
Wouldn't a better approach be to resurrect the existing service as-is
for the sake of the people who want to use it today, and *then* worry
about getting somebody to reimplement it on top of a different
framework?
Yes, definitely.
8 matches
Mail list logo