On Mon, Sep 28, 2020 at 10:12 AM Paul Wise wrote:
>
> Updating the bug metadata to reflect that suggestion.
Thanks, pabs!
Hope this fix can be deployed soon.
Cheers,
--
Roger Shimizu, GMT +9 Tokyo
PGP/GPG: 4096R/6C6ACD6417B3ACB1
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 - wontfix
Bug #932431 [qa.debian.org] DDPO: package removed from experimental but still
shown in DDPO column
Ignoring request to alter tags of bug #932431 to the same tags previously set
> retitle -1 DDPO: hide Extra-Source-Only packages by default,
Bug #932
Control: tags -1 - wontfix
Control: retitle -1 DDPO: hide Extra-Source-Only packages by default,
add option to show them
On Sun, Sep 27, 2020 at 6:00 AM Paul Wise wrote:
> The version in experimental is ESO, so I think it is fine to hide it by
> default, perhaps with a parameter to show ESO packa
On Sun, 2020-09-27 at 14:54 +0900, Roger Shimizu wrote:
> I think above perfectly explains why the original issue of the ticket
> occurs, and it's by design.
> So I add the "wontfix" tag to this ticket.
The version in experimental is ESO, so I think it is fine to hide it by
default, perhaps with
control: tags -1 +wontfix
On Sun, Sep 27, 2020 at 2:38 PM Paul Wise wrote:
>
> It seems if a package from experimental has Built-Using on a package in
> unstable, then dak pulls the unstable source package into experimental
> and adds ESO: yes.
I think above perfectly explains why the original i
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 +wontfix
Bug #932431 [qa.debian.org] DDPO: package removed from experimental but still
shown in DDPO column
Added tag(s) wontfix.
--
932431: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=932431
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org w
On Sun, 2020-09-27 at 14:27 +0900, Roger Shimizu wrote:
> I think this can explain why an old version of package is still in
> archive, but still cannot explain why it appears in *experimental*
> column in DDPO page.
This simply because DDPO just reflects what is in the archive, if you
grep the P
On Sun, Sep 27, 2020 at 9:08 AM Paul Wise wrote:
>
> On Sat, Sep 26, 2020 at 1:57 PM Roger Shimizu wrote:
>
> > So what's ESO?
>
> A package which has this in the Packages file:
>
> Extra-Source-Only: yes
>
> dak uses this to indicate that the source package is only kept around
> for license compl
On Sat, Sep 26, 2020 at 1:57 PM Roger Shimizu wrote:
> So what's ESO?
A package which has this in the Packages file:
Extra-Source-Only: yes
dak uses this to indicate that the source package is only kept around
for license compliance purposes because another package still has a
Built-Using heade
Dear Mattia,
I also met this issue on a few packages I uploaded [2]:
- golang-golang-x-xerrors
- golang-github-google-go-github
- golang-go.crypto
[2] https://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=rosh
>> I have noticed that the package 'golang-github-jinzhu-inflection' is
>> still listed in the exp
On Fri, Jul 19, 2019 at 10:58:15AM +0200, Sascha Steinbiss wrote:
> I have noticed that the package 'golang-github-jinzhu-inflection' is
> still listed in the experimental column of my DDPO page [1] but it has
> in the meantime been superseded by a newer version in testing. rmadison
> also shows th
Package: qa.debian.org
Severity: normal
Dear DDPO team,
I have noticed that the package 'golang-github-jinzhu-inflection' is
still listed in the experimental column of my DDPO page [1] but it has
in the meantime been superseded by a newer version in testing. rmadison
also shows this package to no
12 matches
Mail list logo