On 3/17/21 5:07 PM, Mattia Rizzolo wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 17, 2021 at 05:05:15PM +0100, Andreas Ronnquist wrote:
>> Ah, thanks. I was looking at python-cartopy but didn't notice that
>> there gbp.conf is also updated with proper branch info for each branch.
>> I guess that is why that package don't r
On Wed, Mar 17, 2021 at 05:05:15PM +0100, Andreas Ronnquist wrote:
> >> or even those where
> >> the experimental branch is called simply experimental (and not
> >> debian/experimental) also not showing the version as problematic.
> >
> >This sounds weird, do you have an example?
>
> Ah, thanks.
On Wed, 17 Mar 2021 16:47:02 +0100
Mattia Rizzolo wrote:
>On Wed, Mar 17, 2021 at 03:59:43PM +0100, Andreas Rönnquist wrote:
>> The VCS field on developer Packages overview doesn't seem to
>> consider a debian/experimental branch.
>
>How would DDPO (actually, vcswatch is the component you are i
Package: qa.debian.org
Severity: wishlist
The VCS field on developer Packages overview doesn't seem to consider a
debian/experimental branch.
In my example, the package scite, where unstable has version 4.4.5-2,
and salsa has the tag debian/4.4.5-2 on the debian/master branch, and
it has 5.0.0-1~
4 matches
Mail list logo