Hi Andrei
[1] packages.debian.org only shows a hit in debports
packages.qa.debian.org/timeout helps :-)
Oh, I thought 'oldstable' was reactivated on p.d.o. Ok, I'll just use
the PTS next time.
BTW, would you know why 'rmadison' also comes up empty?
On the mirrors, we seem to have
Dear QA people,
While triaging bugs that don't belong to any package I have found these:
$ querybts --buglist timeout
Querying Debian BTS for reports on timeout...
#531025 change in usage should be doc in NEWS. timeout command always take
'time' seconds to finish
#585745 Please drop timeout
Hi Andrei,
On Donnerstag, 16. Mai 2013, Andrei POPESCU wrote:
As far as I can tell the package is not in Debian anymore[1] so I
propose closing these bugs. If there is no disagreement I will do so in
a few days.
[1] packages.debian.org only shows a hit in debports
On 2013-05-16 14:42 +0200, Andrei POPESCU wrote:
While triaging bugs that don't belong to any package I have found these:
$ querybts --buglist timeout
Querying Debian BTS for reports on timeout...
#585745 Please drop timeout binary package
#531787 timeout move to coreutils?
These can
On Jo, 16 mai 13, 16:34:35, Holger Levsen wrote:
[1] packages.debian.org only shows a hit in debports
packages.qa.debian.org/timeout helps :-)
Oh, I thought 'oldstable' was reactivated on p.d.o. Ok, I'll just use
the PTS next time.
The package is still in oldstable, bugs will be
On Thu, 2013-05-16 at 16:34 +0200, Holger Levsen wrote:
packages.qa.debian.org/timeout helps :-)
The package is still in oldstable
Nope.
adsb@franck:~$ dak ls timeout
adsb@franck:~$
Regards,
Adam
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of
On Jo, 16 mai 13, 19:33:29, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
On Thu, 2013-05-16 at 16:34 +0200, Holger Levsen wrote:
packages.qa.debian.org/timeout helps :-)
The package is still in oldstable
Nope.
That would explain why rmadison also came up empty, but why does the PTS
claim the package is
7 matches
Mail list logo
