Scripsit Thijs Kinkhorst
> Since the RFA has had no takers and the package is not in Etch, I think
> it might be better to remove it rather than keep it in sid. Opinions,
> especially from the maintainers?
Go ahead. As the last active maintainer, I have been meaning to file
for removal for some t
reassign 321693 ftp.debian.org
retitle 321693 RM: vaiostat -- RoM; RC-buggy, no maintainer, inactive upstream
thanks
On Thu, 2006-11-09 at 05:26 +1000, Andrew Pollock wrote:
> No skin off my nose. Feel free.
Ok, doing so (and labeling RoM seems appropriate).
thanks,
Thijs
signature.asc
Descrip
On Wed, Nov 08, 2006 at 08:06:12PM +0100, Thijs Kinkhorst wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> The vaiostat package:
>
> * Is not in testing;
> * Is RC-buggy;
> * Has been up for adoption for well over a year;
> * Is inactive upstream.
>
> Since the RFA has had no takers and the package is not in Etch, I think
Hi all,
The vaiostat package:
* Is not in testing;
* Is RC-buggy;
* Has been up for adoption for well over a year;
* Is inactive upstream.
Since the RFA has had no takers and the package is not in Etch, I think
it might be better to remove it rather than keep it in sid. Opinions,
especially from
4 matches
Mail list logo