Re: Can vaiostat be removed?

2006-11-08 Thread Henning Makholm
Scripsit Thijs Kinkhorst > Since the RFA has had no takers and the package is not in Etch, I think > it might be better to remove it rather than keep it in sid. Opinions, > especially from the maintainers? Go ahead. As the last active maintainer, I have been meaning to file for removal for some t

Re: Can vaiostat be removed?

2006-11-08 Thread Thijs Kinkhorst
reassign 321693 ftp.debian.org retitle 321693 RM: vaiostat -- RoM; RC-buggy, no maintainer, inactive upstream thanks On Thu, 2006-11-09 at 05:26 +1000, Andrew Pollock wrote: > No skin off my nose. Feel free. Ok, doing so (and labeling RoM seems appropriate). thanks, Thijs signature.asc Descrip

Re: Can vaiostat be removed?

2006-11-08 Thread Andrew Pollock
On Wed, Nov 08, 2006 at 08:06:12PM +0100, Thijs Kinkhorst wrote: > Hi all, > > The vaiostat package: > > * Is not in testing; > * Is RC-buggy; > * Has been up for adoption for well over a year; > * Is inactive upstream. > > Since the RFA has had no takers and the package is not in Etch, I think

Can vaiostat be removed?

2006-11-08 Thread Thijs Kinkhorst
Hi all, The vaiostat package: * Is not in testing; * Is RC-buggy; * Has been up for adoption for well over a year; * Is inactive upstream. Since the RFA has had no takers and the package is not in Etch, I think it might be better to remove it rather than keep it in sid. Opinions, especially from