Re: DPT and UDD regarding d/watch file failure

2024-07-23 Thread Gürkan Myczko
Hi Patrice, xorgxrdp at Salsa is still on the previous version and using a clone here is what I am getting: $ git clone https://salsa.debian.org/debian-remote-team/xorgxrdp.git $ cd xorgxrdp $ uscan uscan warn: In debian/watch no matching files for watch line https://github.com/neutrinolabs/x

Re: DPT and UDD regarding d/watch file failure

2024-07-23 Thread Patrice Duroux
Hi, xorgxrdp at Salsa is still on the previous version and using a clone here is what I am getting: $ git clone https://salsa.debian.org/debian-remote-team/xorgxrdp.git $ cd xorgxrdp $ uscan uscan warn: In debian/watch no matching files for watch line https://github.com/neutrinolabs/xorgxrdp/re

Re: DPT and UDD regarding d/watch file failure

2024-07-23 Thread Raphael Hertzog
On Tue, 23 Jul 2024, Mattia Rizzolo wrote: > On Mon, Jul 22, 2024 at 11:35:13PM +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: > > I don't know where tracker.debian.org gets its data about upstream > > status (and errors). I thought it was using UDD, but apparently it > > isn't. > > It is: > https://salsa.debian.or

Re: DPT and UDD regarding d/watch file failure

2024-07-23 Thread Mattia Rizzolo
On Mon, Jul 22, 2024 at 11:35:13PM +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: > I don't know where tracker.debian.org gets its data about upstream > status (and errors). I thought it was using UDD, but apparently it > isn't. It is: https://salsa.debian.org/qa/distro-tracker/-/blob/master/distro_tracker/vendor/d

Re: DPT and UDD regarding d/watch file failure

2024-07-22 Thread Lucas Nussbaum
Ah, I see what you mean. I don't know where tracker.debian.org gets its data about upstream status (and errors). I thought it was using UDD, but apparently it isn't. Lucas On 22/07/24 at 23:12 +0200, Patrice Duroux wrote: > Sorry if I was not clear enough. > > By DPT, I mean Debian Package Tra

Re: DPT and UDD regarding d/watch file failure

2024-07-22 Thread Patrice Duroux
Sorry if I was not clear enough. By DPT, I mean Debian Package Tracker. The error shown there for this package correspond to a version < 1:0.10.0-2 and so to me UDD should be consistant no? (ie. having an error valoue and not null) As d/watch is only fixed in -2. Le lundi 22 juillet 2024, Lucas

Re: DPT and UDD regarding d/watch file failure

2024-07-22 Thread Lucas Nussbaum
Hi, What is DPT? You are a bit too fast. The archive doesn't know about version 1:0.10.0-2 yet. What needs to happen on the UDD side is: - UDD gets a mirror push notification from an archive mirror - UDD updates its knowledge of the archive - UDD runs the 'upstream' (= uscan data) importer (this

Re: DPT and UDD regarding d/watch file failure

2024-07-22 Thread Patrice Duroux
sure, with the version column in UDD query output: udd=> select source,version,watch_file,errors from upstream where source='xorgxrdp'; source | version | watch_file | errors --++-

DPT and UDD regarding d/watch file failure

2024-07-22 Thread Patrice Duroux
HI, After the (very) recent upload of xorgxrdp (version1:0.10.0-2), I was curious to check both DPT and UDD about it. But currently DPT shows me: Problems while searching for a new upstream version high uscan had problems while searching for a new upstream version: In debian/watch no matching fi