Hello,
I have just setup tracker.debian.org. It aims to replace
packages.qa.debian.org but I need your help to achieve this goal and
maintain it in the long term.
I would like to see a few people get familiar with this new code base
so that we have a real maintenance team (i.e. not only me). In t
On 4 July 2014 12:27, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I have just setup tracker.debian.org. It aims to replace
> packages.qa.debian.org but I need your help to achieve this goal and
> maintain it in the long term.
>
> I would like to see a few people get familiar with this new code base
> so t
Hi,
On Fri, 04 Jul 2014, Arturo Borrero Gonzalez wrote:
> I would suggest to add a link in each developer QAs page, and in
> packages.d.o as well.
> This may sound a bit redundant with the PTS, but you (the tracker)
> will get more visibility and others may want to collaborate.
What about just up
On 4 July 2014 14:34, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Fri, 04 Jul 2014, Arturo Borrero Gonzalez wrote:
>> I would suggest to add a link in each developer QAs page, and in
>> packages.d.o as well.
>> This may sound a bit redundant with the PTS, but you (the tracker)
>> will get more visibility
On Fri, Jul 04, 2014 at 02:34:58PM +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> What about just updating those links everywhere to point to the new
> package tracker?
>
> Do people feel that it's too early for this?
IMHO, the right way to go about this is having a grace period during
which both services are a
On Fri, Jul 4, 2014 at 8:34 PM, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> Do people feel that it's too early for this?
I think it is too early for this, at minimum we need to audit the
templates for the old and new codebases to make sure there are at
least bugs filed for each missing/unsynchronised feature.
--
On Fri, Jul 04, 2014 at 12:27:00PM +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> I have just setup tracker.debian.org. It aims to replace
> packages.qa.debian.org but I need your help to achieve this goal and
> maintain it in the long term.
> I would like to see a few people get familiar with this new code base
Hi,
On Fri, 04 Jul 2014, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> For now we should:
>
> - patch the "old" PTS to prominently show a link like "hey, you know
> that there is tracker.d.o now? take a look!". The link should exist on
> every package page and should point to the corresponding package page
>
On Fri, Jul 4, 2014 at 9:56 PM, Paul Wise wrote:
> I think it is too early for this, at minimum we need to audit the
> templates for the old and new codebases to make sure there are at
> least bugs filed for each missing/unsynchronised feature.
I've prepared some things to be added to the TODO fi
On Sun, Jul 13, 2014 at 11:10:59PM +0800, Paul Wise wrote:
> I've prepared some things to be added to the TODO file, based on the
> capabilities of PTS and various things I noticed while auditing the
> PTS and tracker code and templates. I'm happy to help work on some of
> them as I find time to do
10 matches
Mail list logo
