Bug#777434: RFS: slides/1.0.1-14 [ITA] -- Python-based Slide Maker

Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "slides" * Package name: slides Version : 1.0.1-14 Upstream Author : Itamar Shtull-Trauring * URL : http://itamarst.org/software/slides/ * License : LG

Re: Wrong handling of pure ITP and pure ITA bug reports by your automatic WNPP script

On 25/08/13 at 11:05 +0200, Axel Beckert wrote: > Control: retitle -1 ITA: libtie-cache-perl -- perl Tie::Cache - LRU Cache in > Memory > Control: owner -1 Bart Martens > > Hi Lucas, > > Your script which automatically changes ITPs into RFPs and ITAs into > O bugs has

Wrong handling of pure ITP and pure ITA bug reports by your automatic WNPP script

Control: retitle -1 ITA: libtie-cache-perl -- perl Tie::Cache - LRU Cache in Memory Control: owner -1 Bart Martens Hi Lucas, Your script which automatically changes ITPs into RFPs and ITAs into O bugs has an annoying bug: It even changes bugs which where an ITP initially into RFP, which IMHO

Processed: htdig: Resign from ITA

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > package wnpp Limiting to bugs with field 'package' containing at least one of 'wnpp' Limit currently set to 'package':'wnpp' > owner 374643 Debian QA Bug #374643 [wnpp] ITA: htdig -- web search and

Processed (with 1 errors): Resign from ITA

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > package wnpp Limiting to bugs with field 'package' containing at least one of 'wnpp' Limit currently set to 'package':'wnpp' > owner 374643 Debian QA Bug #374643 [wnpp] ITA: htdig -- web search and

Bug#582293: marked as done (qa.debian.org: not all ITA bugs are listed on my qa page)

Your message dated Tue, 14 Sep 2010 15:27:51 +0200 with message-id <20100914132751.ga5...@jwilk.net> and subject line Re: Bug#582293: qa.debian.org: not all ITA bugs are listed on my qa page has caused the Debian Bug report #582293, regarding qa.debian.org: not all ITA bugs are listed on

Re: retitling old ITA/ITP bugs to O/RFP

> That would indeed be the solution that makes the most sense. The problem > > is that "prior state" might be quite hard to determine. > > Don't you need that anyway for determining if an ITA was an O or RFA? > > Re RFPs, inactive RFPs could just be handled

Re: retitling old ITA/ITP bugs to O/RFP

m > is that "prior state" might be quite hard to determine. Don't you need that anyway for determining if an ITA was an O or RFA? Re RFPs, inactive RFPs could just be handled the same. (After retitling from ITP to RFP, close it after N months of inactivity further.) Christo

Re: Race condition ? (Re: retitling old ITA/ITP bugs to O/RFP)

On 26/05/10 at 10:01 +0900, Charles Plessy wrote: > Hi Lucas, > > I think that there is a race condition in the system: I started to do some ITP > tidying after receiving the first round of retitlings, and the next day the > script was changing the title of closed bugs, which is not such a big pro

Re: retitling old ITA/ITP bugs to O/RFP

On 25/05/10 at 21:46 +0200, Olivier Berger wrote: > Le lundi 24 mai 2010 à 21:27 +0200, Lucas Nussbaum a écrit : > > Hi, > > > > David Moreno Garza used to run a script that retitled old ITA/ITP bugs > > to O/RFP. Since this was a useful service, I reimplemented it, a

Race condition ? (Re: retitling old ITA/ITP bugs to O/RFP)

retitle 466682 ITP: emboss-kaptain -- graphical interface to EMBOSS using Kaptain owner 466682 ! thanks Hi Lucas, I think that there is a race condition in the system: I started to do some ITP tidying after receiving the first round of retitlings, and the next day the script was changing the tit

Re: retitling old ITA/ITP bugs to O/RFP

Le lundi 24 mai 2010 à 21:27 +0200, Lucas Nussbaum a écrit : > Hi, > > David Moreno Garza used to run a script that retitled old ITA/ITP bugs > to O/RFP. Since this was a useful service, I reimplemented it, and have > been running it today with fairly conservative setting

Re: retitling old ITA/ITP bugs to O/RFP

On Tue, May 25, 2010 at 11:32:39AM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote: > I think RFPs are all but useless, and that an ITP does not automatically > translate into an RFP anyway - a stale ITP may mean that the proposer is no > longer interested in the package at all, not that they want someone else to > pa

Re: retitling old ITA/ITP bugs to O/RFP

On Tue, May 25, 2010 at 07:01:14PM +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: > > I do not have a strong opinion on the subject (since I never browse the RFP > > bugs), but I suggest to take the following threads and messages into account > > before making a final decision: > > http://lists.debian.org/debian-pr

Re: retitling old ITA/ITP bugs to O/RFP

On 25/05/10 at 18:08 +0900, Charles Plessy wrote: > Le Tue, May 25, 2010 at 09:58:37AM +0200, Xavier Oswald a écrit : > > On 08:44 Tue 25 May , Jan Hauke Rahm wrote: > > > On Tue, May 25, 2010 at 01:37:45PM +0900, Charles Plessy wrote: > > > > > > > > - I think that it is better to close ITPs

Re: retitling old ITA/ITP bugs to O/RFP

On Tue, May 25, 2010 at 4:49 AM, Holger Levsen wrote: > More frequent pings, like every 3 months or maybe 2 even, OTOH, I'd say would > be useful to stimulate the wanna-be maintainers to get the work done. >From where I sit, the workload on -mentors and delay in RFS is a pretty big bottleneck. P

Re: retitling old ITA/ITP bugs to O/RFP

Le Tue, May 25, 2010 at 09:58:37AM +0200, Xavier Oswald a écrit : > On 08:44 Tue 25 May , Jan Hauke Rahm wrote: > > On Tue, May 25, 2010 at 01:37:45PM +0900, Charles Plessy wrote: > > > > > > - I think that it is better to close ITPs instead or retitling them RFPs, > > >otherwise we will

Re: retitling old ITA/ITP bugs to O/RFP

Hi, On Dienstag, 25. Mai 2010, Charles Plessy wrote: > - 18 months delay may be shortenend to six monthes or 1 year, but I think > that 3 months is too short, unless the goal is really to make people close > their ITPs. I do not think that ITPs are discouraging people to contribute. > In contrary

Re: retitling old ITA/ITP bugs to O/RFP

On 08:44 Tue 25 May , Jan Hauke Rahm wrote: > On Tue, May 25, 2010 at 01:37:45PM +0900, Charles Plessy wrote: > > Le Mon, May 24, 2010 at 09:27:37PM +0200, Lucas Nussbaum a écrit : > > > > > > David Moreno Garza used to run a script that retitled old ITA/ITP bugs

Re: retitling old ITA/ITP bugs to O/RFP

On Tue, May 25, 2010 at 01:37:45PM +0900, Charles Plessy wrote: > Le Mon, May 24, 2010 at 09:27:37PM +0200, Lucas Nussbaum a écrit : > > > > David Moreno Garza used to run a script that retitled old ITA/ITP bugs > > to O/RFP. Since this was a useful service, I reimplemented

Re: retitling old ITA/ITP bugs to O/RFP

Le Mon, May 24, 2010 at 09:27:37PM +0200, Lucas Nussbaum a écrit : > > David Moreno Garza used to run a script that retitled old ITA/ITP bugs > to O/RFP. Since this was a useful service, I reimplemented it, and have > been running it today with fairly conservative settings (

retitling old ITA/ITP bugs to O/RFP

Hi, David Moreno Garza used to run a script that retitled old ITA/ITP bugs to O/RFP. Since this was a useful service, I reimplemented it, and have been running it today with fairly conservative settings (18 months of inactivity for both ITP and ITA). (the script is available in collab-qa/retitle

Bug#582293: qa.debian.org: not all ITA bugs are listed on my qa page

Package: qa.debian.org Severity: normal There are 2 bugs that I can confirm right now. #568866 #445205 The bug status shows me as the owner. But the qa page does not list those ITAs. Regards, Ritesh -- System Information: Debian Release: squeeze/sid APT prefers testing APT policy: (990, 't

Bug#582293: qa.debian.org: not all ITA bugs are listed on my qa page

On Thursday 20 May 2010 01:14:28 you wrote: > There are 2 bugs that I can confirm right now. > #568866 > #445205 > > The bug status shows me as the owner. But the qa page does not list > those ITAs. Looks like I jumped too early on this one. #568866 is reflected. #445205 is almost 3 yrs old bug.

Re: Taking over a forgotten ITA, once orphaned.

On 22/04/10 at 12:40 +0200, Mats Erik Andersson wrote: > Hello, > > let me do a quick check on procedures. > > The package netpipes is orphaned, and was ITA-ed in 2008. > On April 1st this year I sent a query for activity to the > corresponding WNPP bug. There has still been

Taking over a forgotten ITA, once orphaned.

Hello, let me do a quick check on procedures. The package netpipes is orphaned, and was ITA-ed in 2008. On April 1st this year I sent a query for activity to the corresponding WNPP bug. There has still been no response, three weeks later. I have rebuilt the package to use format "3.0 (

Advice concerning inactive ITA for Netpipes

Dear QA Team, recently the package Netpipes caught my attention. I see that it was once orphaned, then got an ITA filed, but now is dormant since quite some time. I have pinged the ITA-applicant via the BTS-entry, but will have to wait some time yet for an answer. Personally I would be

Re: Better team maintenance of orphaned packages (Was: Bug#492503: marked as done (ITA: feh -- imlib2 based image viewer))

Andreas Tille wrote: On Tue, 26 Aug 2008, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote: Your message dated Tue, 26 Aug 2008 06:47:03 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#492503: fixed in feh 1.3.4.dfsg.1-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #492503, regarding ITA: feh --

Re: Better team maintenance of orphaned packages (Was: Bug#492503: marked as done (ITA: feh -- imlib2 based image viewer))

On Tue, 26 Aug 2008, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: This idea cames up on a regular basis. I think that the consensus is that it's better to simply use the Debian archive as VCS. When you change/fix something in an orphaned package, just upload ;) Well, OK, this might make some sense if you just not in

Re: Better team maintenance of orphaned packages (Was: Bug#492503: marked as done (ITA: feh -- imlib2 based image viewer))

gt; has caused the Debian Bug report #492503, >> regarding ITA: feh -- imlib2 based image viewer >> to be marked as done. > > At DebConf I learned about the existence of the nice wnpp-alert script. > It is a real shame that this script is somehow hidden below the "noise

Better team maintenance of orphaned packages (Was: Bug#492503: marked as done (ITA: feh -- imlib2 based image viewer))

On Tue, 26 Aug 2008, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote: Your message dated Tue, 26 Aug 2008 06:47:03 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#492503: fixed in feh 1.3.4.dfsg.1-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #492503, regarding ITA: feh -- imlib2 based image viewer

Re: retitling ITA to O

On Thu, Nov 29, 2007 at 07:27:15PM +0100, Bart Martens wrote: > On Thu, 2007-11-29 at 09:22 -0800, Ivan Kohler wrote: > > Also BTW, please do not retitle my old WNPP ITA:s to O: without > > contacting me (though you are more than welcome to take them over and > > upload yourself). > > > > Bug n

retitling ITA to O

On Thu, 2007-11-29 at 09:22 -0800, Ivan Kohler wrote: > Also BTW, please do not retitle my old WNPP ITA:s to O: without > contacting me (though you are more than welcome to take them over and > upload yourself). > Bug number ? Regards, Bart Martens signature.asc Description: This is a digi

Bug#350835: ITA: equivs -- Circumvent Debian package dependencies

Package: wnpp Severity: normal I intend to hijack 'equivs', as its maintainer (Fabio Rafael da Rosa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>) is believed MIA. I will wait a week or so to see he shows up. Peter signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: retitle 287985 ITA: cantus -- Gnome tool to mass-rename/tag mp3 and ogg files

retitle 287985 0: cantus -- Gnome tool to mass-rename/tag mp3 and ogg files thanks In fact, cantus3 is already packaged by Igor Stroh (http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=287986), while cantus is dead (cantus-1.07-1.tar.gz (Stable Branch, 2003-05-20 17:43) on http://debain.org/softwar

Re: ITA - GZZ-*

Hi Sam, in last november you retitled the bugs on GZZ stuff to ITA. We had some discussion on that on IRC as there seems to be a protocol missmatch in ggz-stuff. 01/27/05 [20:21:28] < Netsnipe> paste from #debian before I goto sleep 01/27/05 [20:21:32] < Netsnipe> I think you bette

ITA:

retitle 282201 ITA: simpletal -- Simple TAL, TALES and METAL implementation owner 282201 ! thanks I'm adopting this package. Cheers, Igor -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Splitting ITA into two

On Mon, Nov 08, 2004 at 06:29:18PM +, Martin Michlmayr wrote: > I don't really know whether it's worth doing. In particular, I'm not > very happy about changing practices which many people know of. It's > bad enough to teach people that it's O: and not ITO: and changing it > again now wouldn'

Re: Splitting ITA into two

I don't really know whether it's worth doing. In particular, I'm not very happy about changing practices which many people know of. It's bad enough to teach people that it's O: and not ITO: and changing it again now wouldn't help... Instead, I think energy should be put into moving WNPP away fro

Re: Splitting ITA into two

On Sun, Nov 07, 2004 at 10:17:59PM +0100, Frank Lichtenheld wrote: > On Sun, Nov 07, 2004 at 07:54:54PM +0100, Jeroen van Wolffelaar wrote: > > This has been discussed before[1], but it'd really be nice to have a > > distinction between an ITA in response to a RFA, and an ITA i

Re: Splitting ITA into two

On Sun, Nov 07, 2004 at 07:54:54PM +0100, Jeroen van Wolffelaar wrote: > This has been discussed before[1], but it'd really be nice to have a > distinction between an ITA in response to a RFA, and an ITA in response > to an O. Ok, my first guess was "nice to have", my seco

Splitting ITA into two

This has been discussed before[1], but it'd really be nice to have a distinction between an ITA in response to a RFA, and an ITA in response to an O. Since an orphaned package has by definition no real maintainer, why not use "Intent To Maintain" for the latter use? To make it

ITA: xgsmlib -- Gnome application to handle mobile phone's phone book and SMS

retitle 180060 ITA: xgsmlib -- Gnome application to handle mobile phone's phone book and SMS Hi, I intend to adopt xgsmlib.

Re: ITA/ITH for xdiskusage

begin Florian Ernst quotation: > Hello! > > I intent to adopt / hijack xdiskusage. It isn't really an adoption as > the package hasn't been orphaned, it isn't a real hijack as I believe > the maintainer Carlos Laviola is inactive for quite some time. Actually, I'd rather keep maintaining xdisku

ITA/ITH for xdiskusage

Hello! I intent to adopt / hijack xdiskusage. It isn't really an adoption as the package hasn't been orphaned, it isn't a real hijack as I believe the maintainer Carlos Laviola is inactive for quite some time. On March 5th he has announced to leave the project as expressed in

Re: wnpp: retitle 241775 244202 244203 244204 ITA: newsflash postit translate xtranslate

On Sat, Apr 17, 2004 at 08:57:24PM +1000, Anibal Monsalve Salazar wrote: > retitle 244203 ITA: translate -- translates given words from english to > german or vice Listen, I don't want to start a whole thing here, but recently with the "terminal" package many DDs expressed

wnpp: retitle 241775 244202 244203 244204 ITA: newsflash postit translate xtranslate

package wnpp retitle 244201 ITA: newsflash -- Get news with the newnews command from a server retitle 244202 ITA: postit -- A program sending news retitle 244203 ITA: translate -- translates given words from english to german or vice retitle 244204 ITA: xtranslate -- This is a x11-version

Re: Cleaning up ITA

s, I send the BTS mail to the wrong > > address, causing the [EMAIL PROTECTED] list to be flooded with copies of the > > mail and BTS ACKs). > > Coming back to an old question (as I'm now a DD): > > I looked at WBOS and will try to use/adapt it for my next ITA clean-up

Re: Cleaning up ITA

* Frank Lichtenheld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-04-02 03:24]: > I looked at WBOS and will try to use/adapt it for my next ITA > clean-up run. Do you still use/modify these scripts? Wouldn't it be > good to include them in the qa CVS? We should probably add some > copyrigh

Re: Cleaning up ITA

the [EMAIL PROTECTED] list to be flooded with copies of the > mail and BTS ACKs). Coming back to an old question (as I'm now a DD): I looked at WBOS and will try to use/adapt it for my next ITA clean-up run. Do you still use/modify these scripts? Wouldn't it be good to include t

Re: Next round of ITA checking

* Frank Lichtenheld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003-12-19 00:00]: > I checked all ITA bugs older than six months, closed around 10 > where packages were already uploaded and retitled around 10 back. > Two were reassigned to ftp.debian.org requesting removal of packages. > > After

Next round of ITA checking

Hi. Small announcement to avoid doubled work: In August and September I was going through the list of ITA bugs to identify leftover ones. I checked all ITA bugs older than six months, closed around 10 where packages were already uploaded and retitled around 10 back. Two were reassigned to

Re: ITA: timidity

On Fri, 05 Dec 2003, Andrew Suffield wrote: > I recommend that we operate on the assumption that one will not > appear, and ship timidity configured to run without patches. In this > configuration it is unable to play MIDI files, but can still play > module files (soundtracker, etc), since they emb

Re: ITA: timidity

On Fri, Dec 05, 2003 at 05:31:22PM +0100, Martin Pitt wrote: > On 2003-12-05 7:27 -0200, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote: > > On Thu, 04 Dec 2003, Nathanael Nerode wrote: > > > * timidity: Remove from testing (and orphan). (#166869) > > > > I will adopt this one. > > > > Expect an upload in 7

Re: ITA: timidity

On Fri, Dec 05, 2003 at 07:27:39AM -0200, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote: > On Thu, 04 Dec 2003, Nathanael Nerode wrote: > > * timidity: Remove from testing (and orphan). (#166869) > > I will adopt this one. > > Expect an upload in 7 days. I will probably ignore the timidity-patches > problem

Re: ITA: timidity

Hi! On 2003-12-05 7:27 -0200, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote: > On Thu, 04 Dec 2003, Nathanael Nerode wrote: > > * timidity: Remove from testing (and orphan). (#166869) > > I will adopt this one. > > Expect an upload in 7 days. I will probably ignore the timidity-patches > problems for now,

ITA: timidity

Package: wnpp Severity: normal On Thu, 04 Dec 2003, Nathanael Nerode wrote: > * timidity: Remove from testing (and orphan). (#166869) I will adopt this one. Expect an upload in 7 days. I will probably ignore the timidity-patches problems for now, but we shall see. -- "One disk to rule them

Re: Cleaning up ITA

* Frank Lichtenheld ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [030918 19:35]: > On Thu, Sep 18, 2003 at 05:12:58PM +0100, Colin Watson wrote: > > On Thu, Sep 18, 2003 at 06:08:24PM +0200, Frank Lichtenheld wrote: > > > Hmm, is the BTS database openly available? > > No, sorry. > Ok. One more reason to get through NM :)

Re: Cleaning up ITA

On Thu, Sep 18, 2003 at 05:12:58PM +0100, Colin Watson wrote: > On Thu, Sep 18, 2003 at 06:08:24PM +0200, Frank Lichtenheld wrote: > > On Thu, Sep 18, 2003 at 05:49:48PM +0200, Bas Zoetekouw wrote: > > > It needs the Packages files from unstable and the BTS database. > > > > Hmm, is the BTS databa

Re: Cleaning up ITA

On Thu, Sep 18, 2003 at 06:08:24PM +0200, Frank Lichtenheld wrote: > On Thu, Sep 18, 2003 at 05:49:48PM +0200, Bas Zoetekouw wrote: > > It needs the Packages files from unstable and the BTS database. > > Hmm, is the BTS database openly available? No, sorry. -- Colin Watson

Re: Cleaning up ITA

On Thu, Sep 18, 2003 at 05:49:48PM +0200, Bas Zoetekouw wrote: > You wrote: > > > Which package are we talking about? > > > All. I offered to go through all ITAs, remove done ones, ask for status... > > Since this will take me some hours, I asked on debian-qa first > > if someone is doing this alr

Re: Cleaning up ITA

Hi Frank! You wrote: > > > You'd have to ask bas. CCed. > > Which package are we talking about? > All. I offered to go through all ITAs, remove done ones, ask for status... > Since this will take me some hours, I asked on debian-qa first > if someone is doing this already. And tbm forwarded th

Re: Cleaning up ITA

On Thu, Sep 18, 2003 at 04:10:32PM +0200, Bas Zoetekouw wrote: > You wrote: > > > * Frank Lichtenheld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003-09-18 15:55]: > > > I intend to clean up the ITA list a bit since the last attemp to do this > > > seems to have been in December 20

Re: Cleaning up ITA

Hi Martin! You wrote: > * Frank Lichtenheld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003-09-18 15:55]: > > I intend to clean up the ITA list a bit since the last attemp to do this > > seems to have been in December 2002 (as far as I can see from reading > > That long ago? Hmm. > &g

Re: Cleaning up ITA

* Frank Lichtenheld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003-09-18 15:55]: > I intend to clean up the ITA list a bit since the last attemp to do this > seems to have been in December 2002 (as far as I can see from reading That long ago? Hmm. > If anyone is working on this already or has other

Cleaning up ITA

Hi. I intend to clean up the ITA list a bit since the last attemp to do this seems to have been in December 2002 (as far as I can see from reading the bug reports). If anyone is working on this already or has other reasons to warn me about doubled work, please stand up :) Gruesse, -- Frank

ITA: pingus -- Free Lemmings(tm) clone

retitle 158510 ITA: pingus -- Free Lemmings(tm) clone thanks Hi, I intend to adopt pingus. Simon pgpX9Hk8Y5Bxw.pgp Description: PGP signature

ITA: dhcp-dns -- Dynamic DNS updates for DHCP

retitle 158332 ITA: dhcp-dns -- Dynamic DNS updates for DHCP thanks Hi, I intend to adopt dhcp-dns, as I need it here. :-) Simon pgpL7WQJCG1Ds.pgp Description: PGP signature

Bug#121763: ITA: linbot

retitle 106562 ITA: linbot -- WWW site link checker thanks I intend to adopt linbot. I've already fixed bug #121763 (grave) locally. -- Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#116587: marked as done (ITA: noatun)

Your message dated Wed, 24 Oct 2001 19:07:44 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#116587: ITA: noatun has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is no

Bug#116587: ITA: noatun

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Package: noatun Severity: normal I actively hack on noatun. I want to take over this package to make sure it's up to date. I will also work on the kde3 version of noatun code. Thanks, - -- Eray Ozkural (exa) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Comp. Sci. Dept., B

Bug#110777: ITA: saytime -- Speaks the current time trough your sound card

Package: saytime Severity: normal I would like to adopt the package, I think that is an interesting package.

ITA: libsigc++

libsigc++'s maintainer orphaned it, according to the ChangeLog, but it doesn't seem to be listed in wnpp, so I'm sending the ITA message here. (the other option is to open an ITA bug, I'm not sure which one is correct) I am working on a program that uses sigc++ heavily, and

Bug#82247: marked as done (ITA: pentium-builder -- force pentium optimized compilation)

Your message dated Wed, 07 Mar 2001 15:06:35 -0500 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#82247: fixed in pentium-builder 0.13 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is no

Bug#87152: marked as done (ITA: gsnes9x - GNOME front-end for snes9x)

Your message dated Sat, 24 Feb 2001 15:10:04 -0500 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Installed snes9x 1.29-4 (i386 source) has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now y

Bug#68091 acknowledged by developer (ITA: display-dhammapada -- displays verse from Dhammapada)

This is an automatic notification regarding your Bug report. It has been closed by one of the developers, namely Adrian Bunk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>. Their explanation is attached below. If this explanation is unsatisfactory and you have not received a better one in a separate message then please co

Processed: Right handling of the ITA of netenv

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > retitle 72217 ITA: netenv - Configure your system for different network > environments. Bug#72217: O: netenv - Configure your system for different network environments. Changed Bug title. > close 76158 Bug#76158: ITA: netenv - Configure yo

Bug#76158: ITA: netenv - Configure your system for different network environments.

Package: netenv Severity: normal

ITA: tix41

Package: wnpp Severity: normal I wish to adopt tix41 as it is required by my insight-5.0 package under development. The current version doesn't even build. I've already made changes to let it build under the new tcl/tk packages. I am not a developer yet; Oliver M. Bolzer will be sponsoring me. T

ITA: tix41

I wish to adopt tix41 as it is required by my insight-5.0 package under development. The current version doesn't even build. I've already made changes to let it build under the new tcl/tk packages. I am not a developer yet; Oliver M. Bolzer will be sponsoring me. Thanks, -- Eray (exa) Ozkural C

Bug#68098 acknowledged by developer (ITA: O: xfce -- The Cholesterol Free Desktop Environment)

This is an automatic notification regarding your Bug report. It has been closed by one of the developers, namely Adrian Bunk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>. Their explanation is attached below. If this explanation is unsatisfactory and you have not received a better one in a separate message then please co

Re: Pre-ITA: ntop

>> "Oliver M . Bolzer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > # BTW, is there any docu on how to properly operete the new WNPP ? See http://www.debian.org/devel/wnpp/ Marcelo

Pre-ITA: ntop

e new upstream version and if the task seems managable for a recent NM survivor :-) , I'll post my official ITA to wnpp on BTS. # BTW, is there any docu on how to properly operete the new WNPP ? -- Oliver M. Bolzer [EMAIL PROTECTED] GPG (PGP) Fingerprint = 621B 52F6 2AC1

Re: ITA: python-xml

Hi Jerome, since noone said something against it, I think you can take the package. cu, Adrian -- A "No" uttered from deepest conviction is better and greater than a "Yes" merely uttered to please, or what is worse, to avoid trouble. -- Mahatma Ghandi

ITA: python-xml

Python-xml is currently maintained by the QA Group. Package: python-xml Status: install ok installed Priority: optional Section: interpreters Installed-Size: 1272 Maintainer: Debian QA Group Version: 0.5.1-5 Depends: libc6 (>= 2.1.2), libxmltok1 (>= 1.1-1), python-base (>= 1.5) Suggests: doc-bas

Informal ITA : sysutils

Hello, I have already contacted the previous maintener --- Michael Alan Dorman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>. And I like to know if someone in the Debian-qa list has some extra-informations to give me (have you contacted the upstream authors | mainteners, have you pointers, etc...). The ITA will

calling Jon Rabone / ITA: acs

Is Jon Rabone ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) still developing for Debian? The last upload of the acs package was January 1997 and there are some other very old bug reports, so I assume not. The upstream author of acs has asked me to adopt acs since the Debian package is so old, so I will (if there are no ob