Re: License bugs for sarge

2004-01-28 Thread Nathanael Nerode
Andreas Barth wrote: >I want to support this. For example, the discussion about the total >removal of rocks-n-diamonds is not even one week old. So, I'd like to >wait just a bit. Following a very long background, including long-standing consensus that the current version of the package should not

Re: License bugs for sarge

2004-01-28 Thread Andreas Barth
* Nathanael Nerode ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [040128 19:10]: > Andreas Barth wrote: > >I want to support this. For example, the discussion about the total > >removal of rocks-n-diamonds is not even one week old. So, I'd like to > >wait just a bit. > Following a very long background, including long-stand

Re: License bugs for sarge

2004-01-27 Thread Andreas Barth
* Martin Michlmayr ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [040127 19:10]: > * Nathanael Nerode <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-01-26 22:49]: > > debian-qa: In most cases this is going to require removal of > > packages from sid. It may be appropriate to remove undistributable packages > > from sid even if they will be fix

Re: License bugs for sarge

2004-01-27 Thread Henning Makholm
Scripsit [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Nathanael Nerode) I ran over Nathanael's list of bugs to provide an independent assessment from a d-l point of view; here are my findings. Note that some of the activity seems to be in response to pings from NN earlier today. > 224913: gpsdrive Closed by upload earlie

Re: License bugs for sarge

2004-01-27 Thread Martin Michlmayr
* Nathanael Nerode <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-01-26 22:49]: > debian-qa: In most cases this is going to require removal of > packages from sid. It may be appropriate to remove undistributable packages > from sid even if they will be fixed "later". Appropriate nagging of the > ftpmasters will be ne

Removal of pgeasy [was: Re: License bugs for sarge]

2004-01-27 Thread Martin Pitt
Hi again! On 2004-01-27 14:39 +0100, Martin Pitt wrote: > Hi! > > On 2004-01-26 22:49 -0500, Nathanael Nerode wrote: > > 227793: libpgeasy > > [...] > > -- unhelpful upstream, QA has requested removal from sid > > Could you please wait a bit more before removing this? I > contacted upstream jus

Re: License bugs for sarge

2004-01-27 Thread Raphael Goulais
Le mar 27/01/2004 à 04:49, Nathanael Nerode a écrit : > 228085: airstrike > -- unhelpful upstream, will probably need to be removed from sid I don't know about unhelpful upstream, but I'm the one who filled the five bug reports on airstrike, this one included. Five newer upstream releases are ava

Re: License bugs for sarge

2004-01-27 Thread Martin Pitt
Hi! On 2004-01-26 22:49 -0500, Nathanael Nerode wrote: > 227793: libpgeasy > [...] > -- unhelpful upstream, QA has requested removal from sid Could you please wait a bit more before removing this? I contacted upstream just 12 days ago about this matter and just now using a different email addres

License bugs for sarge

2004-01-27 Thread Nathanael Nerode
I was browsing through http://bts.turmzimmer.net/list.html, and I note the following bugs due to non-DFSG-free or undistributable packages: 228085: airstrike -- unhelpful upstream, will probably need to be removed from sid 224913: gpsdrive 225537: hdate -- unhelpful upstream, maintainer has alre