Re: Mass svn-to-git migration - Progress report

2023-05-02 Thread Diederik de Haas
On Tuesday, 2 May 2023 19:52:03 CEST Jelmer Vernooij wrote: > On Tue, May 02, 2023 at 07:37:00PM +0200, Diederik de Haas wrote: > > Hi Jelmer, > > > > My email program ate the contents of the email including the attachment. > > This is the private email Mattia send us. Could you forward it to me? >

Re: Mass svn-to-git migration - Progress report

2023-04-12 Thread Jelmer Vernooij
On Wed, Apr 12, 2023 at 07:35:30PM +0200, Diederik de Haas wrote: > On Wednesday, 12 April 2023 18:45:31 CEST Jelmer Vernooij wrote: > > I think the git repositories should just be created directly under > > debian/. There's no reason not to, it makes it easier to find them > > (not everybody will k

Re: Mass svn-to-git migration - Progress report

2023-04-12 Thread Diederik de Haas
On Wednesday, 12 April 2023 18:45:31 CEST Jelmer Vernooij wrote: > I think the git repositories should just be created directly under > debian/. There's no reason not to, it makes it easier to find them > (not everybody will know about the alioth-to-salsa-migration-team), > and removes the need to c

Re: Mass svn-to-git migration - Progress report

2023-04-12 Thread Jelmer Vernooij
On Thu, Apr 06, 2023 at 11:02:26PM +0200, Diederik de Haas wrote: > Hi, > > On Friday, 27 January 2023 20:14:43 CEST Jelmer Vernooij wrote: > > I've been looking at how to do a mass conversion. There's about 375 packages > > still listed as being on alioth (~100 in SVN, ~267 in Git, the rest in > >

Re: Mass svn-to-git migration - Progress report

2023-04-12 Thread Mattia Rizzolo
On Wed, Apr 12, 2023 at 05:49:46PM +0200, Diederik de Haas wrote: > > - If it needs to be done, isn't it way better to do a mass-migration of all > > the repos which haven't been converted yet? There may be a high similarity > > between the various SVN repos, but all the projects within one SVN rep

Re: Mass svn-to-git migration - Progress report

2023-04-12 Thread Diederik de Haas
On Wednesday, 12 April 2023 17:12:14 CEST Mattia Rizzolo wrote: > This is all fine and dandy, but one matter that doesn't seem to be > mentioned in anything I've read is how/if you are going to match the SVN > usernames with proper git-ready authorship information (i.e. email > addresses). In my O

Re: Mass svn-to-git migration - Progress report

2023-04-12 Thread Mattia Rizzolo
On Thu, Apr 06, 2023 at 11:02:26PM +0200, Diederik de Haas wrote: > The idea I had/have is to do the conversion and place them in a separate > namespace/group, ready to be picked up by a prospective maintainer. > > I've now created a group for that on Salsa under which the converted repos > can

Re: Mass svn-to-git migration - Progress report

2023-04-06 Thread Diederik de Haas
Hi, On Friday, 27 January 2023 20:14:43 CEST Jelmer Vernooij wrote: > I've been looking at how to do a mass conversion. There's about 375 packages > still listed as being on alioth (~100 in SVN, ~267 in Git, the rest in > something else). > https://janitor.debian.net/cupboard/result-codes/hosted-on