Re: Problems with excuses page

2012-07-31 Thread Adam D. Barratt
On 31.07.2012 08:29, Andreas Tille wrote: On Tue, Jul 31, 2012 at 08:18:13AM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: On 31.07.2012 07:35, Andreas Tille wrote: >The problem I'm now wondering is the excuses page for beast-mcmc: > > http://qa.debian.org/excuses.php?package=beast-mcmc > >I have no idea why i

Re: Problems with excuses page

2012-07-31 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi Adam. On Tue, Jul 31, 2012 at 08:18:13AM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > On 31.07.2012 07:35, Andreas Tille wrote: > >The problem I'm now wondering is the excuses page for beast-mcmc: > > > > http://qa.debian.org/excuses.php?package=beast-mcmc > > > >I have no idea why it is mentioning > > > >

Re: Problems with excuses page

2012-07-31 Thread Adam D. Barratt
On 31.07.2012 07:35, Andreas Tille wrote: The problem I'm now wondering is the excuses page for beast-mcmc: http://qa.debian.org/excuses.php?package=beast-mcmc I have no idea why it is mentioning beast-doc, beast-examples for certain architectures even if these packages are arch=all and

Problems with excuses page

2012-07-30 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi, according to debian-release[1] some binary packages (beast-mcmc-lib) where created when the package was in the new queue even if this should not have happened due to the fact that it needs a package from unstable to build. In bug #681957 I have asked ftpmaster to delete beast-mcmc-lib on thes