Hello,
On Mon, 04 Feb 2008, Barry deFreese wrote:
> I've uploaded a version of imlib that fixes an important and RC bug. If
> someone has time to review/sponsor.
Sune Vuorela wrote:
> On 2008-02-05, Moritz Muehlenhoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> I've uploaded a version of imlib that fixes a
On 2008-02-06, Luk Claes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> That doesn't tell anything about how hard the effort would be in this
> particular case...
I guess someone knowing both api's could probably work it out. I spent
a hour earlier today but didn't get anywhere.
It mostly looks from my view that a
Sune Vuorela wrote:
> On 2008-02-06, Luk Claes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Sune Vuorela wrote:
>>> On 2008-02-05, Moritz Muehlenhoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I've uploaded a version of imlib that fixes an important and RC bug. If
> someone has time to review/sponsor.
You should
Sune Vuorela wrote:
Unfortunately, this is kind of blocked by kde as the kuickshow package
in kde3 uses it.
Can't kuickshow be just dropped? KDE already contains an image viewer (KView),
and kuickshow isn't even registered as a default image viewer if both are
installed. Besides, upstream dro
On 2008-02-06, Luk Claes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Sune Vuorela wrote:
>> On 2008-02-05, Moritz Muehlenhoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I've uploaded a version of imlib that fixes an important and RC bug. If
someone has time to review/sponsor.
>>> You should rather spend your time to
Sune Vuorela wrote:
> On 2008-02-05, Moritz Muehlenhoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> I've uploaded a version of imlib that fixes an important and RC bug. If
>>> someone has time to review/sponsor.
>> You should rather spend your time to get this package removed in favour
>> of imlib2 than kept
On 2008-02-05, Moritz Muehlenhoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> I've uploaded a version of imlib that fixes an important and RC bug. If
>> someone has time to review/sponsor.
> You should rather spend your time to get this package removed in favour
> of imlib2 than kept alive.
Unfortunately, th
On 2008-02-04, Barry deFreese <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> I've uploaded a version of imlib that fixes an important and RC bug. If
> someone has time to review/sponsor.
>
> I'm aware of the two lintian warnings about the soname not matching the
> package name but I didn't want to i
On Mon, Feb 04, 2008 at 12:37:36PM -0500, Barry deFreese wrote:
> Hi folks,
Hi Barry, :-)
> I've uploaded a version of imlib that fixes an important and RC bug. If
> someone has time to review/sponsor.
I'll try to have a look at it tomorrow.
Thanks,
Bas
--
I encourage people to send encryp
Hi folks,
I've uploaded a version of imlib that fixes an important and RC bug. If
someone has time to review/sponsor.
I'm aware of the two lintian warnings about the soname not matching the
package name but I didn't want to introduce that large of a change as it
would end up in NEW.
http:
10 matches
Mail list logo
