Re: rebuilding packages producing no amd64, but other binary-arch packages

2019-01-12 Thread Holger Levsen
On Sat, Jan 12, 2019 at 08:32:42AM +0100, Andreas Beckmann wrote: > Source packages that build binary-arch packages, but no amd64 binary > packages are usually not tested by archive wide rebuilds and may > silently FTBFS for a long time. we build them on amd64/i386/arm64/armhf on https://tests.rep

Re: rebuilding packages producing no amd64, but other binary-arch packages

2019-01-12 Thread Andreas Beckmann
On 2019-01-12 15:26, Holger Levsen wrote: > On Sat, Jan 12, 2019 at 08:32:42AM +0100, Andreas Beckmann wrote: >> Source packages that build binary-arch packages, but no amd64 binary >> packages are usually not tested by archive wide rebuilds and may >> silently FTBFS for a long time. > > we build

Re: rebuilding packages producing no amd64, but other binary-arch packages

2019-01-12 Thread Guillem Jover
Hi! On Sat, 2019-01-12 at 08:32:42 +0100, Andreas Beckmann wrote: > I just looked at #917650, the qi FTBFS which goes back to jessie (at least). > > Source packages that build binary-arch packages, but no amd64 binary > packages are usually not tested by archive wide rebuilds and may > silently F

Re: rebuilding packages producing no amd64, but other binary-arch packages

2019-01-14 Thread Lucas Nussbaum
On 12/01/19 at 08:32 +0100, Andreas Beckmann wrote: > Hi, > > I just looked at #917650, the qi FTBFS which goes back to jessie (at least). > > Source packages that build binary-arch packages, but no amd64 binary > packages are usually not tested by archive wide rebuilds and may > silently FTBFS f

Re: rebuilding packages producing no amd64, but other binary-arch packages

2019-01-19 Thread Andreas Beckmann
On 2019-01-14 19:53, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: > On 12/01/19 at 08:32 +0100, Andreas Beckmann wrote: >> Source packages that build binary-arch packages, but no amd64 binary >> packages are usually not tested by archive wide rebuilds and may >> silently FTBFS for a long time. >> Does anyone have an ide