Re: Re: Removed packages handling

2021-02-01 Thread Andrey Rahmatullin
On Mon, Feb 01, 2021 at 01:49:56PM +0100, benatt...@gezapig.nl benatt...@gezapig.nl wrote: > These are abandoned packages no one cares for. > Also all orphaned packages should go to Debian QA Group. > Seems logic to me. > > What is harder to find are the realy orphaned packages that also exist,

Re: Re: Removed packages handling

2021-02-01 Thread benatt...@gezapig.nl benatt...@gezapig.nl
These are abandoned packages no one cares for. Also all orphaned packages should go to Debian QA Group. Seems logic to me. What is harder to find are the realy orphaned packages that also exist, thes are not realy bound to a maintainer but are still healthy.

Re: Removed packages handling

2021-02-01 Thread Andrey Rahmatullin
On Mon, Feb 01, 2021 at 11:57:49AM +0100, benatt...@gezapig.nl benatt...@gezapig.nl wrote: > I wonder if removed packages should go to Debian QA Group. What do you mean? -- WBR, wRAR signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Removed packages handling

2021-02-01 Thread benatt...@gezapig.nl benatt...@gezapig.nl
I wonder if removed packages should go to Debian QA Group. Made some maybe handy lists. (not yet all packages) gone packages https://www.gezapig.nl/Software/Special/Gone2021.html Debian QA Group https://www.gezapig.nl/Software/Special/Debian_QA_Group2021.html Nice Day, Ben