Raphael Geissert wrote:
If nobody cares enough to report anything then why should we keep them? I
think that's the main rationale here. Of course, making it a release goal (as
in terms of RC, not RG) would allow anyone to know that if nothing happens it
won't be shipped, thereby making people
Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
On 25/11/08 at 20:42 -0600, Raphael Geissert wrote:
The default policy is going to be: orphaned packages are not candidates in
Err
s/The default policy is going to be/The proposed policy is
shape for a release; but as Luk said, the severity might be lowered if needed
On 21/08/08 at 23:13 +0200, Holger Levsen wrote:
Hi,
On Friday 15 August 2008 05:16, Steve Langasek wrote:
(you might want to check the video when it will be available)
From experience, there seems to be a several-month delay before videos
become available after DebConf.
Hi,
On Friday 15 August 2008 05:16, Steve Langasek wrote:
(you might want to check the video when it will be available)
From experience, there seems to be a several-month delay before videos
become available after DebConf.
On Thu, Aug 21, 2008 at 11:13:38PM +0200, Holger Levsen wrote:
On Friday 15 August 2008 05:16, Steve Langasek wrote:
(you might want to check the video when it will be available)
From experience, there seems to be a several-month delay before videos
become available after DebConf.
On Fri, Aug 15, 2008 at 05:45:52PM +0200, Frank S. Thomas wrote:
I think it would also be nice if wnpp-alert could sort packages by popcon
score so that developers know which packages are more worth adopting.
Anyone interested in creating infrastructure to bring popcon data into
a system and
* Lucas Nussbaum [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-08-14 18:16]:
The idea of having a script inside devscripts that lists the RC-buggy
and orphaned packages that are locally installed was proposed. I filed a
bug about that. See #495152
These are included already:
wnpp-alert - check for installed
On 15/08/08 at 09:21 +0300, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
* Lucas Nussbaum [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-08-14 18:16]:
The idea of having a script inside devscripts that lists the RC-buggy
and orphaned packages that are locally installed was proposed. I filed a
bug about that. See #495152
These are
On 15/08/08 at 05:49 +0200, Luk Claes wrote:
Steve Langasek wrote:
On Fri, Aug 15, 2008 at 12:01:26AM -0300, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
- O: bugs are now RC, so packages are removed from testing using the
release team's existing policies. Which means that some O: packages
might stay in testing
On Fri, Aug 15, 2008 at 09:21:30AM +0300, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
These are included already:
wnpp-alert - check for installed packages up for adoption or orphaned
rc-alert - check for installed packages with release-critical bugs
Ah, according to #495152 you want cronjobs around those
On Friday 15 August 2008 15:52:55 Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
On Fri, Aug 15, 2008 at 09:21:30AM +0300, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
These are included already:
wnpp-alert - check for installed packages up for adoption or orphaned
rc-alert - check for installed packages with release-critical
On Fri, 2008-08-15 at 17:45 +0200, Frank S. Thomas wrote:
[...]
I think it would also be nice if wnpp-alert could sort packages by popcon
score so that developers know which packages are more worth adopting.
That would be #478835.
Adam
(who really should be packing and not reading mail :-)
Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
Sure, Luk was here, and didn't express any disagreement. Actually, I
tried hard to give several opportunities to raise concerns, but
everybody apparently really agreed with the proposal. (you might want to
check the video when it will be available)
That wasn't really my
On 15/08/08 at 12:30 -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
Sure, Luk was here, and didn't express any disagreement. Actually, I
tried hard to give several opportunities to raise concerns, but
everybody apparently really agreed with the proposal. (you might want to
check the video
Hi,
Here is a list of what was discussed/agreed upon during Debconf's QA
BOF.
Handling of orphaned packages
=
After lenny release, the handling of O, ITA and RFA bugs will be
changed.
- O:, ITA: and RFA: are reassigned to the package they are about.
- They are marked
On 14/08/08 at 19:41 -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
On Thu, Aug 14, 2008 at 06:16:43PM -0300, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
Here is a list of what was discussed/agreed upon during Debconf's QA
BOF.
Handling of orphaned packages
=
After lenny release, the handling of
On Fri, Aug 15, 2008 at 12:01:26AM -0300, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
- O: bugs are now RC, so packages are removed from testing using the
release team's existing policies. Which means that some O: packages
might stay in testing for a longer time because they are dependencies
of other
Steve Langasek wrote:
On Fri, Aug 15, 2008 at 12:01:26AM -0300, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
- O: bugs are now RC, so packages are removed from testing using the
release team's existing policies. Which means that some O: packages
might stay in testing for a longer time because they are
18 matches
Mail list logo
