Re: Results of a trawl for old, ignored RC bugs

2003-10-18 Thread Martin Michlmayr
* Matt Zimmerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003-10-12 22:55]: > > postnuke: #197636 -- cross site scripting vulnerability! > > Maintainer: Hugo Espuny <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Also lots of outstanding NMUs. His other package has *also* been NMUed > > because he's been absent. > > I believe he's probably

Re: Results of a trawl for old, ignored RC bugs

2003-10-16 Thread Matt Zimmerman
On Sun, Oct 12, 2003 at 06:59:35PM -0400, Nathanael Nerode wrote: > modutils: #171949 > Maitnainer wants help. I think you mean #171947. This bug should really be trivial to fix by enforcing a sane umask. I think it deserves an NMU by now, but I can't do it at the moment. > postnuke: #197636 -

Re: Results of a trawl for old, ignored RC bugs

2003-10-13 Thread Martin Michlmayr
* Nathanael Nerode <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003-10-12 18:59]: > request-tracker: #191165 -- command line utilities don't work > Already orphaned and maintained by QA. Not in 'stable'. I suggest > total removal unless some other package depends on it. (I can't > seem to figure out whether any do

Results of a trawl for old, ignored RC bugs

2003-10-12 Thread Nathanael Nerode
I went through the RC bug list, and stripped out all bugs which satisfied any of these conditions: 1. On a package not in 'testing'. 2. Applies only to 'potato' and/or 'woody'. 3. 'sarge-ignore'. 4. 'unreproducible' 5. Scheduled for removal from 'testing' and/or 'unstable'. 6. Bug has number >2