On Tue, Jul 22, 2003 at 01:22:34PM +0200, Andreas Barth wrote:
> What seems important to me: To tag any of the bugs of the removed
> packages as "woody" or close them, whatever is appropriate.
Personally, I think it's generally better to just close them.
Cheers,
--
Colin Watson
* Frank Lichtenheld ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [030722 11:05]:
> On Mon, Jul 21, 2003 at 11:51:07PM +0100, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> > Unfortunately the qa.d.o web site isn't maintained that well, but
> > there are some things listed there. There isn't currently much
> > coordination, so just just workin
* Frank Lichtenheld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003-07-22 10:57]:
> While browsing through the qa pages I saw that quite a few orphaned
> packages are been removed last week from unstable. Can the WNPP bugs
> be closed or is there a reason they're still open?
No reason other than I haven't gotten around
On Mon, Jul 21, 2003 at 11:51:07PM +0100, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> Unfortunately the qa.d.o web site isn't maintained that well, but
> there are some things listed there. There isn't currently much
> coordination, so just just working on something you think is
> important, such as checking RC bug
* Frank Lichtenheld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003-07-22 00:36]:
> I'm currently looking for something I can do in Debian apart from
> my work for the web pages.
> I'm very interested in doing QA work but I have some questions about
Excellent.
> How are QA Uploads handled and coordinated? If I'm inter
Hi.
I'm currently looking for something I can do in Debian apart from
my work for the web pages.
I'm very interested in doing QA work but I have some questions about
procedures and policies:
How are QA Uploads handled and coordinated? If I'm interested in
fixing some of the bugs in the packages
6 matches
Mail list logo
