Am Wed, Oct 13, 2021 at 02:42:01PM +0200 schrieb Mattia Rizzolo:
> Indeed udd-mirror had stopped taking in updates due to a leaked
> lockfile.
>
> It should be up2date now.
Thanks a lot
Andreas.
--
http://fam-tille.de
Hi,
On Wed, Oct 13, 2021 at 06:44:46AM +0200, Andreas Tille wrote:
> I just checked and the public UDD mirror keeps on presenting outdated
> results as I wrote below. Can some of the admins have a look?
Indeed udd-mirror had stopped taking in updates due to a leaked
lockfile.
It should be up2da
Hi again,
I just checked and the public UDD mirror keeps on presenting outdated
results as I wrote below. Can some of the admins have a look?
Thanks a lot
Andreas.
Am Tue, Oct 12, 2021 at 04:42:21PM +0200 schrieb Andreas Tille:
> Hi,
>
> Am Tue, Oct 12, 2021 at 02:43:56PM +0200 schrieb
Hi,
Am Tue, Oct 12, 2021 at 02:43:56PM +0200 schrieb Lucas Nussbaum:
> > udd=> select source , version, debian_mangled_uversion, upstream_version,
> > status from upstream where source in ('r-cran-s2','r-cran-rwave') ;
> > source| version | debian_mangled_uversion | upstream_version |
Hi,
On 11/10/21 at 08:39 +0200, Andreas Tille wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I think the issue described below by Nilesh Patra might be caused by the
> fact that the UDD dump[3] is not updated properly. I just downloaded
> the dump and get a modification time of
>
>Modify: 2021-10-11 02:55:01.0 +
Hi,
I think the issue described below by Nilesh Patra might be caused by the
fact that the UDD dump[3] is not updated properly. I just downloaded
the dump and get a modification time of
Modify: 2021-10-11 02:55:01.0 +0200
and md5sum
fb9c6cb3ddb3d819983f7c0d82a50669 udd.dump
Whi
6 matches
Mail list logo
