meaning of O and RFA (was: Re: Hijacking^W^W^W^W^W^WSalvaging packages for fun and profit: A proposal)

2012-09-28 Thread Bart Martens
On Fri, Sep 28, 2012 at 07:47:54PM +0200, Jakub Wilk wrote: > * Arno Töll , 2012-09-28, 18:48: > >Packages being marked as orphaned, or those being up for adoption > >can be immediately taken over. > > If a package is RFA-ed (as opposed to O-ed), the maintainer retains > all the usual privileges,

Re: meaning of O and RFA (was: Re: Hijacking^W^W^W^W^W^WSalvaging packages for fun and profit: A proposal)

2012-09-28 Thread Steve Langasek
On Fri, Sep 28, 2012 at 06:00:03PM +, Bart Martens wrote: > On Fri, Sep 28, 2012 at 07:47:54PM +0200, Jakub Wilk wrote: > > * Arno Töll , 2012-09-28, 18:48: > > >Packages being marked as orphaned, or those being up for adoption > > >can be immediately taken over. > > If a package is RFA-ed (as

Re: meaning of O and RFA (was: Re: Hijacking^W^W^W^W^W^WSalvaging packages for fun and profit: A proposal)

2012-09-28 Thread Ricardo Mones
On Fri, 28 Sep 2012 18:00:03 + Bart Martens wrote: > On Fri, Sep 28, 2012 at 07:47:54PM +0200, Jakub Wilk wrote: > > * Arno Töll , 2012-09-28, 18:48: > > >Packages being marked as orphaned, or those being up for adoption > > >can be immediately taken over. > > > > If a package is RFA-ed