Subject: ncpfs: Causes kernel tracelog with kernel 2.6.38
Package: ncpfs
Version: 2.2.6-8
Severity: normal
Hello,
since using linux-image-2.6.38-2-amd64 from testing I observed kernel
tracelogs when trying to access a Novell drive mounted via ncpfs. The
following text was found in
On Sat, 14 Jan 2006, Marco d'Itri wrote:
reassign 347958 pppoeconf
Well, do you think this is caused by a broken config file?
Looks like you did not already configure your ethernet connection and
pppoeconf is not correctly configuring /etc/network/interfaces to raise
eth1 before starting
On Sat, 14 Jan 2006, Marco d'Itri wrote:
Well, do you think this is caused by a broken config file?
Yes.
I tried to investigate into it and have to admit that it was *not only*
a broken config file.
Well, my question is quite simple: How can I get a solid working
configuration?
auto isp
On Sat, 14 Jan 2006, Marco d'Itri wrote:
What further information would you need?
A detailed log showing what does not work (tcpdump and ppp.log are a
good start).
Well, you got the ppp.log in one of my previous mails (from a working
and a non-working version). I'll prepare tcpdump if this
On Sat, 14 Jan 2006, Marco d'Itri wrote:
A detailed log showing what does not work (tcpdump and ppp.log are a
good start).
Attached is the promissed tcpdump output. Just ask me for further
infromation.
Kind regards
Andreas.
--
http://fam-tille.de
tcpdump.tgz
Description: GNU
On Thu, 19 Jan 2006, Marco d'Itri wrote:
On Jan 16, Andreas Tille [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
ping 193.175.81.44
--- failed
I do not know what your problem is, but the PPP session is successfully
negotiated and even DNS queries are exachanged. Your pings to
193.175.81.44 are rejected
Package: ovito
Severity: minor
Hi,
the ovito package seems to be unmaintained despite the fact that it
looks quite interesting for chemistry or science in general. So
I keep DebiChem and Debian Science teams in CC whether they might be
interested in packaging the latest version of Ovito[1]
.
# The reson for the following overrides is just to make sure that the pure
# number of these man page problems might hide any other more relevant
# problem in the package and thus they are overriden for the moment.
# Andreas Tille [EMAIL PROTECTED]
motif-clients: manpage-has-errors-from-man usr
Hello,
according to a relatively high popcon stat and the fact that my
package arb just depends from libmotif3 I tried to care a little
bit for openmotif. So I added XS-Autobuild: yes to the
debian/control header because I was not able to detect any
reason inside the license that might forbid
On Mon, 21 Jul 2008, Debian Installer wrote:
There are disparities between your recently accepted upload and the
override file for the following file(s):
libmotif-dev_2.2.3-3_i386.deb: package says section is non-free/libdevel,
override says non-free/devel.
Either the package or the override
On Tue, 22 Jul 2008, Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt wrote:
Done.
Great!
Many thanks for the quick response
Andreas.
--
http://fam-tille.de
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Fri, 24 Apr 2009, Ben Finney wrote:
Andreas, there is already a package (with a later version) which does
all of this except the list bullet characters, *and* adopts the
package, closing Bug#451712. It is awaiting a sponsor.
$ dget
On Fri, 30 May 2003, Colin Watson wrote:
Package: fastlink
Version: 4.1P-fix88-2
Severity: normal
I was about to do a QA upload of fastlink to fix RC bug #194913, but
then I noticed that it already has a maintainer despite having
Maintainer: Debian QA Group [EMAIL PROTECTED] in its control
Hi,
I just detected apt-listbugs which at first view sounds a very reasonable
tool which should be made more public. At second view which included a
view to
http://bugs.debian.org/apt-listbugs
with a lot of long standing bugs, some of them tagged patch and some of
them seem easy to fix I
On Tue, 14 Jun 2005, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
findimagedupes -- Finds visually similar or duplicate images [#218699]
* Orphaned 590 days ago
* Package orphaned 360 days ago.
I'll have a look at it especially because there is a C++ version available
at the web page. So even if it is orphaned
On Thu, 5 Jul 2001, Jordi Mallach wrote:
pccts: completely unmaintained. Should be orphaned/removed right away.
Seems so. I checked if NMU would makes sense but decided to don´t touch it.
picasm: besides it looks it should be in main, it's pretty abandoned.
Same as above.
vtprint: Rich, can
On Thu, 4 Nov 2004, Riku Voipio wrote:
True. That list looks to me like the list of the most used packages
(dpkg, mount and glibc at the top...) By taking popcon.debian.org
statistics into account, the list will probably look quite a bit
different. It still won't take in account the work done
On Thu, 4 Nov 2004, Thomas Viehmann wrote:
help. Perhaps we might focus on the ranking numbers 100 to 500 and
forget the top most because it is hard to automatically handle these.
What's next? Having an IRC bot that will randomly insult developers with open
bugs in their packages, with the
On Thu, 4 Nov 2004, Michael Stone wrote:
On Thu, Nov 04, 2004 at 09:46:38PM +0100, Andreas Tille wrote:
Please explain your understanding of the relation of the words
a) help - as I wroteand
b) insult - as you interpreted my mail
Have you checked the thread title lately?
Thanks, you
On Wed, 20 Jul 2005, Santiago Vila wrote:
It should not be a bug to do things differently than Ubuntu.
For this purpose there is the wontfix tag.
Kind regards
Andreas.
--
http://fam-tille.de
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble?
On Thu, 21 Jul 2005, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
I expect Demudi to be able to provide patches in the BTS, no ? Or do
they have the same resource problem than Ubuntu where a few maintainers
are doing so many modifications ?
If my information about DeMuDi is correct they try to port back all their
Hi,
I attach a mail of Nelson A. de Oliveira in the end of this mail and ask
for your advise. Nelson is in the NM queue and I'm sponsoring his packages.
He did a great job in the past and I want to hear your opinion about my
suggestion:
IMHO it would be best to start with group maintainance.
On Sat, 30 Jul 2005, Steve Langasek wrote:
I think that if such a change is made to the Uploaders: field of a package
without the maintainer's approval, this means that instead of just hijacking
the package, you've hijacked the package and then *lied* about it. It isn't
comaintenance unless
On Thu, 29 Sep 2005, Nathanael Nerode wrote:
These packages are candidates for removal by virtue of having
been sitting in unstable without being in 'testing' for very long periods.
It has a few false positives for packages which were kicked out of testing
recently, but they are pretty good
On Sun, 15 Jan 2006, Justin Pryzby wrote:
Can we remove xpcd?
Hmmm, I would prefer if the long standing bugs with patches would be
fixed.
Package reported obsolete upstream
Even if reported obsolete this package is know to be robust in showing
Kodak PCDs while other programs sometimes
Hi,
I just want to hear Debian-QA opinion whether serpento is worth
keeping or whether its sense (i18n problems of dictd which are known
to be solved) is not valid any more and we should drop the package.
Thanks for your opinions
Andreas.
On Wed, 15 Mar 2006, Mark van Eijk wrote:
On Thu, 23 Mar 2006, Alexander Schmehl wrote:
I have no strong feelings about pngcrush. Just used it a couple of
times in the past and might need such a tool in the future, while not
knowing of similar tools. It seemed to me, that no one else wanted it,
so I steped in.
I'm sponsoring pngnq
Hi,
at
http://lists.debian.org/debian-qa/2006/03/msg00089.html
I asked whether we might want to remove serpento. I'd vote for
it but my question was ignored.
Any opinions?
Andreas.
--
http://fam-tille.de
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of
On Wed, 19 Jul 2006, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
* Andreas Tille [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006-07-18 15:06]:
http://lists.debian.org/debian-qa/2006/03/msg00089.html
I asked whether we might want to remove serpento. I'd vote for
it but my question was ignored.
Any opinions?
I suggest you ask
On Wed, 2 Aug 2006, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
* Martin Michlmayr [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006-08-01 17:13]:
What would you think about stop building the dict-wn package?
Well, I'd really like for Bob Hilliard to comment given that he
maintains dict.
Bob pointed out to me in private that I had the
On Fri, 6 Oct 2006, Thijs Kinkhorst wrote:
Combined, I don't think fixing the RC bug(s) is worth the effort for the
package in its current state.
Even as Debian-Med adictive person I would say:
When you discover you are riding a dead horse,
the best strategy is to dismount.
So lets
wrote:
On Wed, Jul 19, 2006 at 01:23:34AM +0200, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
* Andreas Tille [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006-07-18 15:06]:
http://lists.debian.org/debian-qa/2006/03/msg00089.html
I asked whether we might want to remove serpento. I'd vote for
it but my question was ignored.
I am working
On Thu, 13 Dec 2007, Kumar Appaiah wrote:
I am trying to help out by finding rdepends of packages in the oldlibs
section, and am hoping that cleaning up the oldlibs section could be
made a Lenny release goal (distant dream).
You should probably define cleaning up oldlibs more precisely.
I
On Wed, 9 Jan 2008, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
Given Matthew's reasons for resigning, I think it would be
respectful to spare him the emails
Well, if there is no better communication channel than e-mail
I would go for it starting: I would like to consider your wish
to not to get any Debian
Hi,
I'm maintaining the package fastdnaml and wanted to move the Homepage
information I putted into the long description formerly to the Homepage
tag of the control file. When doing so I verified that the home page is
correct but failed. The project seems to have vanished from the web.
I have
On Sun, 17 Feb 2008, Jack T Mudge III wrote:
AFAICT, it would seem that didiwiki is in this group as well. I found plenty
of links to it's nonexistant homepage. It's a frusterating situation, since
most users (myself included) expect to be able to go to the homepage and
find out more about the
On Sun, 17 Feb 2008, Alexander Schmehl wrote:
Well, I would say, that if only usefull purpouse of the homepage was to
download the tarball, than you can just drop the homepage header;
appearently the user has no nead for the tarball ;)
Well, you are right that there is no need to point to a
On Mon, 18 Feb 2008, Alexander Schmehl wrote:
No, I meant archive.org (not .com as I wrote previously, sorry). They
archive web pages like a library (see for example
http://web.archive.org/web/19970502070835/http://www.debian.org/), and
maybe the have the documentation pages of your software
On Mon, 18 Feb 2008, Kapil Hari Paranjape wrote:
On Mon, 18 Feb 2008, Alexander Schmehl wrote:
Well, a third and fourth alternative would be to download the
documentation from archive.org, and (assuming you have the right for
distribution) but them in a -doc package or put it on
On Mon, 18 Feb 2008, Russ Allbery wrote:
One low-tech thing that one could do is just put, in the package long
description, a note that the software is dead upstream. Personally, I
think that's often information worthy of being in the long description;
one purpose of the long description,
On Wed, 12 Mar 2008, Barry deFreese wrote:
I tried this a while back also. Kevin is upstream bye the way. Last time I
spoke with him via e-mail, he was more interested in wx2.8 or 3.0 but now
that he is the proverbial last man standing he might be persuaded, I don't
know.
Well, I don't
On Fri, 13 Jun 2008, Ana Guerrero wrote:
reopen 483179
retitle 483179 PTS: please *do not* link to Ubuntu Launchpad bugs page
thanks
...
09:41 buxy ana: and accept my decision as PTS maintainer
...
About buxy's second sentence, it is not at all a way to finish a discussion.
Accept my
On Wed, 16 Jul 2008, Frank Lichtenheld wrote:
science-physics on http://qa.debian.org/developer.php should do this,
but it returns the page
http://qa.debian.org/developer.php?task=science-physics which says No
information available for Task: science-physics.
I wonder why you think this should
On Fri, 18 Jul 2008, Chris Walker wrote:
What I want is a way of keeping an eye on packages in one of these
metapackages to see that they are at least vaguely up to date and not
full of RC bugs. I was then going to add it to
http://wiki.debian.org/DebianScience in the hope that scientists will
On Fri, 18 Jul 2008, Chris Walker wrote:
Yes exactly what I was after - except that it doesn't track the
upstream versions.
Well, this is a subject for my (your ;-)) todo list. BTW, would you
regard it reasonable to split the bug pages according to single tasks
or not. Currently the page
On Mon, 28 Jul 2008, Chris Walker wrote:
I guess you want this
http://debian-med.alioth.debian.org/bugs.php
for Debian Science, right?
Yes exactly what I was after - except that it doesn't track the
upstream versions.
BTW, we also track upstream versions via
On Sat, 16 Aug 2008, Sandro Tosi wrote:
On Sat, Aug 16, 2008 at 11:22, Vincent Bernat [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I would have prefered that you converted the package to some patch
management system but since this is a QA upload, I have uploaded it
anyway.
Yeah, it's a good idea, and
On Tue, 26 Aug 2008, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
Your message dated Tue, 26 Aug 2008 06:47:03 +
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#492503: fixed in feh 1.3.4.dfsg.1-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #492503,
regarding ITA: feh -- imlib2 based image viewer
to be
On Tue, 26 Aug 2008, Russ Allbery wrote:
Why not just use collab-maint for this?
Good question - I was just as unaware about this project as I was
about wnpp-alert script. :-(
Is it just me that I'm ignorant about important pieces of information
or is it just not well enough advertised?
On Tue, 26 Aug 2008, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
This idea cames up on a regular basis. I think that the consensus is
that it's better to simply use the Debian archive as VCS. When you
change/fix something in an orphaned package, just upload ;)
Well, OK, this might make some sense if you just not
On Tue, 26 Aug 2008, Y Giridhar Appaji Nag wrote:
You probably do not follow the low volume debian-news mailing list
See http://lists.debian.org/debian-news/2006/msg00016.html
Well, yes, I do not follow this list. I've thought d-d-a is enough.
It is a little bit hard to decide which channel
Hi,
I would like to ask for comments on my plan to find a reasonable way to
produce QA pages for a certain set of packages. The idea behind this
is that David Paleino has created nice pages for Debian Med at
http://debian-med.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/qareport.cgi
which is an adaptation of
On Wed, 24 Sep 2008, Paul Wise wrote:
DDPO supports subscribing to more packages, see the info here:
http://qa.debian.org/developer.php
So your suggestion would be to write a CGI script that obtains
the packages in question and feed this as argument to
On Wed, 24 Sep 2008, Paul Wise wrote:
Er, you didn't read down the page far enough (see the Subscribing to
Packages heading).
Whenever you want a new package to be monitored by DDPO for your team,
send a mail:
I do not really want to subscribe and I also think that the general
mail address
On Thu, 25 Sep 2008, Paul Wise wrote:
IIRC it isn't possible to use addresses that are not in Maintainers or
Uploaders with DDPO. I guess DDPO isn't for you then.
OK.
This directs the mail to the DDPO mail bot:
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
This sets the user to the Debian Med packaging team:
On Thu, 25 Sep 2008, Paul Wise wrote:
(hope that these anchors links will be set - if not its probably easy
to create a patch.)
Seems they are set, no patch needed.
Yes, you are right.
But it seems that this method does not in all cases work reliable:
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Sep 25
On Tue, 28 Oct 2008, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
Enrico Zini have ad for a while some code which find package
similarities, in fact I believe it is the one used on
packages.debian.org to show similar packages.
H, what means similar packages? I really can not imagine
some code that detects
On Tue, 28 Oct 2008, Holger Levsen wrote:
If this has left the state of discussion and has become a fact, can we have a
mail on d-d-a about this please?!
Yes, we can and we will have. I just need some time for recovering
from offline backlog - I hope to get something out at the weekend.
On Tue, 28 Oct 2008, Enrico Zini wrote:
You bet. You can do it by looking for packages with similar tags, or
clustering them according to similarity in the description. Or both.
Ahh, detecting similarities based on tags - sure, what else should I
have expected if it was code from Enrico.
On Tue, 28 Oct 2008, Enrico Zini wrote:
No, not just tags: Xapian has features to compute similarity based on whatever
you index: you can put popcon into the mix, or dependencies, or keywords from
/usr/share/{doc,man}, or whatever really.
Shame on you that you did not reported about this in
On Wed, 29 Oct 2008, Paul Wise wrote:
Yes, I have seen these nice tools and I'm thinking about this. But I really
hope that the ideas to maintain screenshots more generally inside Debian
(there were several suggestions on the lists - but no implementation as far
as I know :-(). Once this is
Hi Raphaël,
I like your proposal in principle, but I see some problem with
group maintenance. While I'm in principle a supporter of group
maintenance I do not see how it should work with your proposal.
Who in the group will be addressed by your proposal? You are
talking about a passive
On Thu, 15 Jan 2009, James Westby wrote:
Some fixes had built up in Ubuntu's ncpfs package, and as the package
is QA maintained I rolled a proposed update for Debian. Would someone
kindly review and sponsor my package at
http://people.ubuntu.com/~jamesw/packages/ncpfs_2.2.6-6/ncpfs_2.2.6-6.dsc
On Thu, 15 Jan 2009, James Westby wrote:
E: ncpfs source: outdated-autotools-helper-file contrib/php/config.sub
2003-10-07
E: ncpfs source: outdated-autotools-helper-file contrib/php/config.guess
2003-10-07
These I should have fixed I realise.
Yes.
W: ncpfs: binary-without-manpage
Hi,
as you can read in my lightning talk at DebConf
http://people.debian.org/~tille/talks/200808_lightning/
I did some investigation on who is frequently posting
on our mailing lists. I now created graphs until
end of last year and write a short summary for
those lists I regard worth a
On Tue, 27 Jan 2009, James Westby wrote:
I have just put an updated package at
http://people.ubuntu.com/~jamesw/packages/ncpfs_2.2.6-6/ncpfs_2.2.6-6.dsc
Thanks. Just uploading the sponsored package.
The remaining lintian issues are:
W: ncpfs source: ancient-libtool contrib/php/ltmain.sh
On Fri, 13 Feb 2009, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
Well, January is over. ;-)
Any news regarding watch file information.
erm, no, unfortunately. Want to work on it? :-)
I prefer to work on things I have enough knowledge first - perhaps
some people who harvested watch file information at other
On Fri, 13 Feb 2009, Adeodato Simó wrote:
http://ftp-master.debian.org/new.822
Looks good. Any hint how to reasonably obtain
description of binaries
long_description of binaries
homepage
license(perhaps)
The html page has links to
On Fri, 13 Feb 2009, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
Are you interested in DEHS (whether a given package is up-to-date or
not), or in the raw debian/watch content?
I think two fields of information are needed:
boolean is_up_to_date
text upstream_version
from packages table if you have
Hi,
I would like to include information about packages residing
in the new queue into Blends tasks pages. Because I decided
to use UDD as main source of information for these pages I
would like to inject information about new queue into UDD
first. I've got a hint to
On Sun, 15 Feb 2009, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
Or should we rather start to just move the information of
http://ftp-master.debian.org/new.822
into UDD for the moment and wait.
Yeah, it would make sense to:
- add all the info from new.822 to UDD
- file a bug about exporting the other missing
Hi,
I realised that UDD contains several entries in the packages
table with only different architecture. Did I missed something
or would it make sense to create a lookup table
CREATE table package_architecture_lookup (
package text,
architecture text,
);
and remove the
On Thu, 19 Feb 2009, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
and remove the architecture column from the packages table?
Packages can have different put any other field here on different
architectures, so you would lose information by doing that.
If this is the case (I just trust you) my suggestion is not
On Thu, 19 Feb 2009, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
Well, Depends: can obviously change between architectures. And there's
no reason why other fields wouldn't be different as well, since control
files are generated on a per-arch basis during the build process.
OK, I'm definitely convinced in this
On Thu, 19 Feb 2009, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
Having a big single table might be a performance win compared to several
shorter tables that you would often need to join.
Yes - I kept this in mind but wanted t hear your opinion about this.
Also, during import, for each package, you would need to
information Andreas Tille wanted from DEHS in UDD?
Quote from http://lists.debian.org/debian-qa/2009/02/msg00027.html
I think two fields of information are needed:
boolean is_up_to_date
text upstream_version
If you think more information makes sense it is fine - but these
two fields
Hi,
DEHS is reporting new versions of GNUmed with the current watch file
which says:
http://www.gnumed.de/downloads/client/([\d\.]+)/GNUmed-client\.(.*)\.tgz
These new versions are only release candidates (0.4-rc\d) which should
not be packaged (as I agreed with upstream). So I might live
On Mon, 23 Feb 2009, Paul Wise wrote:
So I wonder whether I missed some trick in my watch file or whether this
should rather be regarded as an uscan bug which should go back to the
directory with the next lower version number and scan the files there.
Until uscan gets smarter about cases like
On Mon, 23 Feb 2009, Paul Wise wrote:
There doesn't appear to be a bug open about it and IMO such a feature
would probably be useful so I'd suggest filing one.
#516704
Thanks
Andreas.
--
http://fam-tille.de
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a
On Mon, 23 Feb 2009, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
I believe this boils down to basically the same request as #375138,
which has been marked wontfix for a couple of years.
I admit this seems to be the same problem - sorry fo not verifying
BTS properly.
I haven't merged
them yet as I'm undecided as
On Fri, 13 Feb 2009, Andreas Tille wrote:
http://ftp.debian.org/debian/dists/dist/main/i18n/
and injects the following structure in UDD:
package, language, version, distribution, release, component (='main'),
description, long_description
Sounds good. Maybe reorder them a bit
On Wed, 25 Feb 2009, Andreas Tille wrote:
Regarding the version number I found
http://svn.debian.org/viewsvn/collab-qa/udd/sql/debvercmp.sql?view=markup
which contains a function which implements `dpkg --compare-versions` in SQL
which would be really handy for my task. Unfortunately
On Mon, 2 Mar 2009, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
The plan is to switch to Roger Leigh's work in UDD as well, but someone
needs to do the work, and unfortunately, i'm very busy currently. See
http://git.debian.org/?p=users/rleigh/sbuild.git;a=tree;f=db;hb=81fd39259953853632a7d0e2198cfc745d270fe3
for
On Mon, 23 Feb 2009, Paul Wise wrote:
Until uscan gets smarter about cases like these, how about this?
version=3
http://www.gnumed.de/download/ \
http://www.gnumed.de/downloads/client/[\d\.]+/GNUmed-client\.([\d\.]+)\.tgz
Hmmm, this worked as long as 0.3.10 was the latest version but now
On Mon, 2 Mar 2009, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
Looks good. Any hint how to reasonably obtain
description of binaries
long_description of binaries
homepage
license(perhaps)
Regarding (short) description I have this file generated daily using
UDD available for
Hi,
at Linux-Tage Chemnitz I've got a request from a user who reported
a bug including patch against xfig which did not recieved any
reesponse by the maintainer. Looking at the bug page of Roland
I wonder whether he is MIA and his packages should be taken over
by Debian QA.
Kind regards
On Sat, 14 Mar 2009, Roland Rosenfeld wrote:
You're right, I don't have too much time for Debian at the moment, but
I don't think I'm MIA.
Fine.
But xfig is a special case. I'm waiting for the upstream maintainer
who sent me a pre release of his package without public releasing it
and
On Sat, 14 Mar 2009, Luk Claes wrote:
I would rather think of forming an inter-distribution team (per package
or globaly if that would make sense) to take over upstream. For
bash-completion that worked out very well.
That's what I mean. I have no idea whether per package or globaly
is
On Fri, 13 Feb 2009, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
It depends on your data source. I'm not familiar with DDTP. If (package,
version) is enough as a primary key, let's just use that.
I commited a ddtp importer to collab-qa/udd. It is based on DDTP translation
files which are enriched by the package
On Tue, 17 Mar 2009, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
On 17/03/09 at 08:51 +0100, Andreas Tille wrote:
2. sql/ddtp.sql
Create the table in UDD. Some fields contain comments. I wonder
whether we should relay on the inline comments in this file or
whether we should implement COMMENT
On Wed, 18 Mar 2009, Martijn van Oosterhout wrote:
On Tue, Mar 17, 2009 at 8:51 AM, Andreas Tille til...@rki.de wrote:
To tackle this I tried to calculate MD5 sums of the package descriptions
which turned out quite error prone. The code became hard to read hacky
and not really reliable
On Mon, 23 Mar 2009, David Paleino wrote:
Aww... and I thought I had wrote an useful program. :(
Neverminds, going back to my NEW gui (yes, NEW, the queue :)
Might be the same here: I'm currently busy writing a NEW queue UDD
gatherer. So at some point in time it might be better to base
your
Hi,
what is the method / policy to fill the field 'task' in the table packages of
UDD? If I try for example
udd=# SELECT CASE WHEN length(task) 60 THEN task ELSE substring(task for 56)
|| '...' END AS tasks, count(*) from packages group by task limit 30;
tasks
Hi,
the UDD wiki page [1] gives the following advise:
o From merkel.debian.org: /usr/lib/postgresql/8.3/bin/psql 'service=udd'
This gives a psql session - but it seems not to be the up to date UDD:
ti...@merkel:~$ /usr/lib/postgresql/8.3/bin/psql -q 'service=udd'
udd= \d packages
ERROR:
On Fri, May 15, 2009 at 10:10:22AM +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
ti...@merkel:~$ /usr/lib/postgresql/8.3/bin/psql -q 'service=udd'
udd= \d packages
ERROR: column reltriggers does not exist
LINE 1: SELECT relhasindex, relkind, relchecks, reltriggers, relhasr...
On Fri, May 15, 2009 at 10:26:34AM +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
could you add that to the wiki?
Done.
DSA and alioth admins are aware of it.
Fine.
Kind regards
Andreas.
--
http://fam-tille.de
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of
Hi,
if I try for instance
SELECT MAX(version) FROM packages WHERE package = 'gcc' GROUP BY version
order by version desc;
max
4:4.3.3-5
4:4.3.3-3
4:4.3.2-2
4:4.2.4-5
4:4.1.1-15
(5 rows)
I get several maximum versions of the package gcc. Am I missing something
or
On Sat, May 16, 2009 at 08:42:25PM +0100, Roger Leigh wrote:
Is it possible that the GROUP BY is making the max() function
operate on the versions within each group (which will be
identical due to being grouped), therefore returning
multiple group results?
Yes, I think I was somehow tricked
Hi,
I observed encoding problems when reading descriptions from
UDD if they do contain non-ASCII characters and I wonder
what I might do wrong. Here is a little test program which
queries for some descriptions I found to be problematic:
On Fri, May 22, 2009 at 06:36:39PM +0200, Adeodato Simó wrote:
UDD just has the descriptions from Packages.gz, which supposedly are in
UTF-8. If your destination (a file, terminal, whatever) should be
receiving UTF-8, you can just pass them unmodified, eg.:
for row in curs.fetchall():
1 - 100 of 529 matches
Mail list logo
