Bug#134069: marked as done (general: /usr/lib/bookmarker/lib/bklocal.inc is word readable)

Your message dated Tue, 26 Feb 2002 19:47:08 -0500 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#134069: fixed in bookmarker 2.7.0-2.1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is n

Bug#133858: marked as done (bookmarker: Typo on the package description)

Your message dated Tue, 26 Feb 2002 19:47:08 -0500 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#133858: fixed in bookmarker 2.7.0-2.1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is n

bookmarker_2.7.0-2.1_i386.changes ACCEPTED

Accepted: bookmarker_2.7.0-2.1.diff.gz to pool/main/b/bookmarker/bookmarker_2.7.0-2.1.diff.gz bookmarker_2.7.0-2.1.dsc to pool/main/b/bookmarker/bookmarker_2.7.0-2.1.dsc bookmarker_2.7.0-2.1_all.deb to pool/main/b/bookmarker/bookmarker_2.7.0-2.1_all.deb Announcing to debian-devel-changes@lis

Bug#135968: bookmarker is not lintian clean

Package: bookmarker Version: 2.7.0-2.1 the bookmarker package is not lintian clean: E: bookmarker source: build-depends-without-arch-dep N: N: The control file specifies source relations for architecture-dependent N: packages, but no architecture-dependent packages are built. Most N: likely

Bug#135869: russian template file [zope-emarket]

PACKAGE: zope-emarket Template: zope-emarket/postinst Type: boolean Default: true Description: Do you want me to restart Zope? To let this product/feature work properly, you need to restart Zope. If you want, I may restart Zope automatically, else you should do it your self. Description-ru: Вы х

Bug#135854: mgdiff: not able to diff utf-8 files

Package: mgdiff Version: 1.0-17 Severity: normal Once more, mgdiff's stupid binary-file detection strikes. Files in UTF-8 containing non-ASCII characters are considered to be binary and are not diffed. Even if they were, mgdiff wouldn't be able to display them properly, I guess. -- System Inform

Re: meta-kde package and Testing

--- Colin Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Mon, Feb 25, 2002 at 09:51:44PM +0200, Hugo van der Merwe wrote: > > Is there any chance that the meta-kde package can make it into testing > > before release? > > > > Sorry, this has probably been asked many many times... (where's the > > answer,