Your message dated 05 Dec 2002 03:51:13 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#93202: fixed in linuxconf 1.18r1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your re
Your message dated 05 Dec 2002 03:51:19 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#161903: fixed in linuxconf 1.26r4-2.1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now yo
On Sat, 18 May 2002 05:17:17 +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 29, 2002 at 02:58:56PM +, Colin Watson wrote:
> > I can't reproduce this bug with the current version of linuxconf in
> > testing and unstable, 1.26r4-2. I tried 'linuxconf --setmod treemenu'
> > from a fresh install, and lin
Your message dated Wed, 04 Dec 2002 18:17:54 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#171283: fixed in tux-aqfh 1.0.14-3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Accepted:
vreng_4.2.0-1.diff.gz
to pool/main/v/vreng/vreng_4.2.0-1.diff.gz
vreng_4.2.0-1.dsc
to pool/main/v/vreng/vreng_4.2.0-1.dsc
vreng_4.2.0-1_i386.deb
to pool/main/v/vreng/vreng_4.2.0-1_i386.deb
vreng_4.2.0.orig.tar.gz
to pool/main/v/vreng/vreng_4.2.0.orig.tar.gz
Announcing to debian-d
Accepted:
tux-aqfh-data_1.0.14-3_all.deb
to pool/main/t/tux-aqfh/tux-aqfh-data_1.0.14-3_all.deb
tux-aqfh_1.0.14-3.diff.gz
to pool/main/t/tux-aqfh/tux-aqfh_1.0.14-3.diff.gz
tux-aqfh_1.0.14-3.dsc
to pool/main/t/tux-aqfh/tux-aqfh_1.0.14-3.dsc
tux-aqfh_1.0.14-3_i386.deb
to pool/main/t/tux-aqfh
6 matches
Mail list logo